Having mixed feelings on books is the worst.
On one hand, I really enjoyed both Tony and Tammy— their complex father-daughter relationship, how the failings of Tony’s father do him in again and again, how he tries to better himself up until that urge to atone, along with Oliver and Kip’s privilege and carelessness, end up causing his death. Tammy reconciling her identities as she grows up, and how her story ends with her finally returning to Tony’s home in China. When the book is about this— about Tony, Kim, and Tammy’s experiences as an immigrant family and their complex feelings about that, and each other— it excels. The scenes between them after Tony’s heart attack genuinely almost made me cry.
But this book has a massive blemish, and blemish thy name is Oliver.
He works as an antagonist. As a personification of the privilege and recklessness that the other characters could never afford to have. I came to the shaky conclusion that we weren’t supposed to like him after what he does to Tony, and the way he completely becomes like the family he despised, directly paralleling Tony consistently fighting that failing, is powerful and thematically relevant. However, his POV is a slog and something I was consistently dreading, and, most relevantly, there was absolutely no reason to make the relationship between him and Tammy romantic.
Doing the math, there is a 17-20 year age gap between them. He is at least 26 to her *9* when they first meet. He describes being “captivated” by her since he first saw her playing the piano at Clara’s, again, when she is NINE. I don’t care that the romantic aspect of their relationship is added when she’s an adult. The power dynamic established by the way they meet is irreparable, and it’s creepy, and it’s nauseating to read about, ESPECIALLY when he willingly lets her kiss him knowing FULL DAMN WELL that she’s both vulnerable and that he’s WITNESSED AND COVERED UP THE MURDER OF HER FATHER. We are not supposed to like Oliver. But the disturbing nature of their relationship doesn’t feel like it’s acknowledged as such by the narration until Tony’s death happens, when in truth I think it should’ve been WAY before then; or at least have Tammy acknowledge that she was continuously manipulated by an older man who she trusted long before she ever realized he was bad.
And the thing is, their relationship honestly would’ve worked better if it wasn’t romantic. If it was kept as teacher and student, mentor/mentee, more explicitly paralleling the relationship between Kip and Oliver— Oliver gives in to the bad influence of his mentor and protects him, but Tammy denies him this, breaking the cycle. I understand we have a bit of this already, but drawing that line would’ve made it more clear and would’ve removed the book’s biggest problem.
I feel bad, because when this book succeeds, it’s beautiful to read. But Oliver and Tammy’s horrifying relationship— as well as Oliver as our third POV character— drag “Paper Names” down extensively.