Love the publisher's aesthetic, his political and cultural commitments, and the general vibe of the books he puts out. The notion of an anthology whose purpose is to capture the broader breakdown of so many things is brave, and more engaged than many a themed anthology. Judging by what's here, the call was quite general as well, and it attracted a number of big names.
That said, I wish this were better. The last thing we need is milquetoast both-sidesism, but I do have to note that a lot of these are built on incredibly simplistic takes where bad people (maliciously intrusive small-town gossips; stiff-necked, intolerant private-school heads; Trump-type voters) mostly get a deserved comeuppance for being bad. I'm not saying that the point should be to celebrate the kind of meanness and gloating relish in cruelty we're seeing all around these days, or even to say, "well, hey, but why do these people behave this way? I better hit up that diner in Pennsylvania where I found those same four Trump voters who've been interviewed ad nauseam since 2016 and air, yet again, the ignorant bile and resentment that these 'forgotten Americans' spew." But take the private-school story: the entire point is that a couple of malicious teenagers cook up a plot to get rid of their new head, who has the temerity to enforce the rules, by sending anonymous lies to the longtime head of the associated boys' school accusing their new head of smoking, having boys over, etc. This man, who has allegedly worked with teenagers for decades, immediately becomes hysterical over the contents of these letters, does not do even the most basic checking-up (apparently, no students have ever lied to him or attempted to pit adults against one another in his career), and concocts a series of plots to discredit her that, of course, end up rebounding horribly.
You know what would be better? If that character had the remotest shred of plausibility and complexity rather than being a one-dimensional voice of horrified, old-line conformism. Not because "the other side" needs to be celebrated or even plumbed all that deeply (you want to do one of those Eudora Welty pieces where you get inside Musk's head or something--was thinking of the one where she predicted James Earl Ray's mindset before anyone knew who had shot MLK--go for it), but just because I think good fiction for the current predicament embraces some sense of complexity and accuracy. (I liked John F.D. Taff's entry in some ways, since it explodes the [il]logic of partisanship to its [ir]ational extreme, but again the central character is just a cartoon.)
There are a few good entries, my favorites being Andy Davidson's, one of the best at executing the brief with subtlety, and Laird Barron's, which feels at best tangentially linked to the theme, but it's another one of his delightful, jauntily sardonic cosmic-horror yarns featuring a clan of, well, monstrous entities (one seems to be a vampire, one some sort of extra-dimensional entity, and so on) masquerading as a family in upstate New York and doing their best to bring on evil, but also dealing with even more evil entities and worse, bureaucratic BS in the realm of evil. It's at once a joke and a fun monster story.
All in all, a project I admired but that I wish had been executed with a greater degree of subtlety.