Lebanon may be the most complicated place in the world to be a "mixed" couple. It has no civil marriage law, fifteen personal status laws, and a political system built on sectarianism. Still, Lebanon has the most interreligious marriages per capita in the Middle East. What constitutes a mixed marriage is in flux as social norms shift, and reactions to mixed marriage reveal underlying social categories of discrimination. Through stories of Lebanese couples, Love Across Difference challenges readers to rethink categories of difference and imagine possibilities for social change.
Drawing on two decades of interviews and research, Lara Deeb shows how mixed couples in Lebanon confront patriarchy, social difference, and sectarianism. In the drama that ensues as women and young men make their own marital choices, they push gender boundaries and reveal the ultimately empty nature of sect as a category of social difference. Love won't end sectarianism, but it can contribute to reducing sect's social power. Through the example of Lebanon, we can learn about our own social worlds, about the assumptions we make around social difference, and about how people react when forced to change their ideas of who can be made kin through marriage.
Very interesting and well-written book about a phenomenon that doesn’t get much attention outside of the West. However the author did not engage at all with concerns Lebanese may feel about the effects of intermarriage & losing the next generation on the future of their community/minority sect, which are anything but irrelevant in the current Middle East and abroad. Such concerns were presented as backward and stemming from prejudice rather than having any rational basis at all.
Furthermore she felt the need to mention the current Gaza conflict and present it as a ‘genocidal campaign by Israel to push the Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip,’ of course without mentioning Hamas or 7/10, which as an Israeli I can’t look past. Overall recommend to those interested in the subject, but keeping in mind the author’s ideological inclinations is important. Also interesting that the Islamic prohibition against leaving the faith wasn’t mentioned.