This is NOT the original “Vertical.” The original “Vertical,” the official “Sideways” sequel, was released almost 6 years ago. It captured the prestigious Gold Medal for Popular Fiction from the Independent Publisher Book Awards in 2012.
If you’re going to come out with a re-issue, why come out with this bowdlerized, expurgated, Reader’s Digest version, repackaged with amateurish illustrations and -- get this! -- with a new ending slapped on?! And then present it to potential readers and the media in a press release that it’s a new book from the author of “Sideways.” As the author, I had absolutely nothing to do with this edition. I did not endorse it, nor was I involved in it in any way, shape, or form. In fact, I contractually ended my ties with this publisher 4 years ago, and though the publisher might have the legal right to re-issue this piece of literary travesty, he did not have the moral or aesthetic right, let alone the talent or the craft that he claims in a press release, which is pure fiction.
A perusal of this book clearly shows that the editorial is a slipshod hatchet job. I refuse to read it, but one of my copy-editors suffered through it to ensure me that it was done in a sloppy, haphazard manner. I write in a unique R-rated, but highly literary style. It’s as if some schoolmarm took a red pencil to Henry Miller and Jack Kerouac and decided to make it palatable to book clubs who like their books F-word free. In doing so, the prose has been butchered. The dialogue has been mangled. This is literary savagery at its most maladroit. Worse are the terrible cartoons that litter the pages in and throughout. Even worse is that that illustrator gets equal billing. Unbelievable.
There has been an outcry by my fans, here, and in social media. Somehow, the publisher has managed to scrub the one-star reviews, probably because the author’s fans don’t need to buy the book to know that it’s literary savagery. I guess only Verified Purchases remain.
Since the publisher has put out an arrogant statement on social media that he re-issued this ersatz version because the book was poorly reviewed and didn’t sell well, that deserves a response. First off, the book was NOT poorly reviewed. It won the highest award an independent published book could possibly win. The truth is, the book was so ineptly marketed, it was hardly reviewed at all. It’s as if, in his statement, the publisher is blaming the book, not him and his “PR team” on the shoddy job they did of marketing the “Sideways” sequel and are now coming out with this terrible mishmash of an award-winning novel to save face. That’s all one can conclude.
Everyone who knows me and knows my work knows how deeply embarrassed and deeply hurt I am by this book being peddled as if it were the original “Vertical.” It is not. Buyer beware, and people in the PR world beware! There will never be a movie made from from this, as the publisher seems to insinuate in his press materials. The author has long since moved on. Apparently, the publisher has not. Unable to admit failure, he throws this unmitigated disaster out there to the wolves in a desperate, pathetic attempt to hawk some Christmas sales.
Fortunately for me, all my work -- including the original “Vertical” manuscripts -- is enshrined in Special Collections at my alma mater UCSD next to great poets and writers and even Dr. Seuss. This sorry excuse for a re-issue will never get within a mile of my collection. It will more likely go down in a Publishers Hall of Shame somewhere some day.