disclaimer that I know the author slightly and am (favorably) cited in chapter 1, but I think I can be objective. Very good, engaging, concise analysis of distinguishable aspects of hope (dispositional optimism, situation-specific estimate of favorable probabilities, wishing for good outcomes, waiting patiently to get thru bad times, etc. etc. etc.).
Blends research review, anecdotes, literary allusions, history, and a small, welcome dose of relevant autobiography (I hadn't known he was an adoptive parent for instance). He started out wanting to be a pastor and has written quite a bit about mutual influences of psychological theorizing and religion/spirituality, incl. from time to time in this book. Whatever you think of motivational interviewing, behavioral self-control training for heavy drinkers, etc. etc., I think anybody would find Bill Miller to be a wise person and calming presence, and his persona comes thru well in this one.
Now for my minor quibbles:
1. Maybe at behest of publisher (?), he sort of grafts on a self-help angle [e.g., little shaded boxes with questions for reflection, like in a section on when persistence is futile: "Can you think of a time in your life when you kept trying too long, too often, too hard to make something happen?" [p. 112]]. I'd be shocked if this minimal guidance actually proved to be of lasting benefit to anyone with a real concern in this vein. If for some reason a rich person decides to bankroll a publishing house and let me run it, I'd encourage them to bypass that sort of approach. There's a market for lay-accessible writeups of psych research and its implications without pretending that it's a self-help book.
2. What's with the tiny print? Old people read books too! Almost needed a magnifying glass.
3. I got this as a comp copy for having done a prepublication review of something else, so I suppose it's churlish to criticize a prepub reviewer of this one, but.........the one front-cover blurb is Adam Grant's "Dr. Miller is a trailblazer in psychology", which was obvious almost 50 years before publication of, and has nothing specifically to do with, this book. I hope that was excerpted clumsily from a longer statement, or else Dr. Grant should have to send back his copy.