What do you think?
Rate this book
The Greatest Traitor: The Life of Sir Roger Mortimer, 1st Earl of March
A vivid and dramatic popular history of this feudal lord, rebel leader and dictator of England.
King Edward II was murdered by the lover of his estranged Queen Isabella, Sir Roger Mortimer. This biography of 14th century England's evil genius offers a new and controversial theory regarding the fate of Edward II.
King Edward II was murdered by the lover of his estranged Queen Isabella, Sir Roger Mortimer. This biography of 14th century England's evil genius offers a new and controversial theory regarding the fate of Edward II.
246 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2003
184 people are currently reading
2994 people want to read
About the author
Ian Mortimer
40 books1,453 followersAKA James Forrester.
Dr Ian Mortimer is a historian and novelist, best known for his Time Traveller's Guides series. He has BA, MA, PhD and DLitt degrees from the University of Exeter and UCL. He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, and was awarded the Alexander Prize by the Royal Historical Society in 2004. Home is the small Dartmoor town of Moretonhampstead, which he occasioanlly introduces in his books. His most recet book, 'Medieval Horizons' looks at how life changed between the eleventh and sixteenth centuries.
He also writes in other genres: his fourth novel 'The Outcasts of Time' won the 2018 Winston Graham Prize for historical fiction. His earlier trilogy of novels set in the 1560s were published under his middle names, James Forrester. In 2017 he wrote 'Why Running Matters' - a memoir of running in the year he turned fifty.
At present he is concentrating on writing history books that have experimental perspectives on the past. One example is a study of England as it would have appeared to the people living in his house over the last thousand years. This is provisionally entitled 'The History of England through the Windows of an Ordinary House'. It is due for completion in December 2024 and publication in 2026.
Dr Ian Mortimer is a historian and novelist, best known for his Time Traveller's Guides series. He has BA, MA, PhD and DLitt degrees from the University of Exeter and UCL. He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, and was awarded the Alexander Prize by the Royal Historical Society in 2004. Home is the small Dartmoor town of Moretonhampstead, which he occasioanlly introduces in his books. His most recet book, 'Medieval Horizons' looks at how life changed between the eleventh and sixteenth centuries.
He also writes in other genres: his fourth novel 'The Outcasts of Time' won the 2018 Winston Graham Prize for historical fiction. His earlier trilogy of novels set in the 1560s were published under his middle names, James Forrester. In 2017 he wrote 'Why Running Matters' - a memoir of running in the year he turned fifty.
At present he is concentrating on writing history books that have experimental perspectives on the past. One example is a study of England as it would have appeared to the people living in his house over the last thousand years. This is provisionally entitled 'The History of England through the Windows of an Ordinary House'. It is due for completion in December 2024 and publication in 2026.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 102 reviews
January 21, 2019
When one thinks of a scandalous love affair in English monarchial history; the immediate response is Anne Boleyn and King Henry VIII. Believe it or not, a century prior, a similar indignity played out in medieval England but with a queen taking the lead. The queen – Queen Isabella, consort to King Edward II and the lover being the infamous Roger Mortimer. Although Queen Isabella has received plenty of attention (dubbed the She-Wolf , she is either loved or hated); Mortimer has failed to be the focus of a full volume. Historian Ian Mortimer (no relation) attempts to remedy this in, “The Greatest Traitor: The Life of Sir Roger Mortimer Ruler of England 1327- 1330”.
Mortimer’s “The Greatest Traitor” is an ambitious piece meshing together a biography portrait of the life of Roger Mortimer with an analysis of the events surrounding the rise and fall of Edward II, Mortimer alleged affair with Queen Isabella, and Roger’s own eventual demise. Due to the lack of conclusive source material, much of “The Greatest Traitor” especially in the early chapters, is more of a background look at Roger Mortimer’s environment and upbringing in relation to the political atmosphere. In fact, a majority of the content is too politically-charged and can be deemed as slow-moving to those readers not as interested in such material. This results in a piece that appears to leave Roger under a shroud of mystery in terms of his inner-workings and psyche and is therefore more circumstantial.
That being said, Mortimer’s research is mind-blowingly extensive and the amount of information regarding the time period presented in “The Greatest Traitor” is truly amazing; putting the reader on the front lines in an illustrative and accessible way. The events bounce off the pages evoking emotion almost as though Mortimer experienced them first-hand while he was penning the pages.
Also notable, is the absence of biases on Mortimer’s behalf. The incredible amount of sleuth work conducted by Mortimer could have led to a personal bias but Mortimer eschewed opinions and never pushed a specific angle on the pages of “The Greatest Traitor.”
One of the strongest characteristics of “The Greatest Traitor” is the inclusion of content and documents that are new even to those familiar with the subject. This is also expressed through Mortimer’s investigation of the theory exposing King Edward II’s murder as a hoax. The death of King Edward II is a generally accepted one and is thus quite lofty of Mortimer to explore such a lesser-traversed terrain. The issue with this is that Mortimer declares this theory to be fact and truth but doesn’t readily back this up with concise reasoning (Mortimer revisits this topic in an afterword and as will I).
The same can be said of the chapters discussing Queen Isabella’s rumored pregnancy with Roger: Mortimer basically states this as an undisputable truth but the explanations are flimsy and weak at best.
The pace of “The Greatest Traitor” naturally quickens when exploring the rise and fall of Roger’s power. Even though Roger’s private thoughts are not broken down; readers do understand the man on an intimate level by diving into his actions, actions, accounts, household ledgers, etc. Mortimer’s piece-by-piece assembling of the bigger puzzle picture is extraordinary and truly offers an enlightened illumination.
The concluding chapters of “The Greatest Traitor” focus on King Edward III’s growing distaste toward Roger and his consequential downfall. Although a riveting subject, Mortimer’s former extensive breakdown of historical material is absent and the ending “The Greatest Traitor” is rushed and abrupt leaving some unanswered questions. This doesn’t logically make sense with the rest of the book and makes for a weak finality.
After the Epilogue, Mortimer re-examines the theory of the ‘faux’ death of King Edward II attempting to prove its merit. Sadly, the presentation is still inconclusive with bare-bone evidence and doesn’t offer jaw-dropping reading material. However, it is remarkable of Mortimer to offer this material in the first place in the context of it not being readily discussed elsewhere.
Mortimer rounds up “The Greatest Traitor” with an Afterword, Annotated Notes, an itinerary of the whereabouts of Roger Mortimer during his lifetime, a listing of Roger’s offspring, genealogical tables, and a bibliography. Missing from the text are some photo color plates which would have added more spark to the pages.
“The Greatest Traitor” is a passionately researched piece, highly focused on detective work. Although lacking credibility at some parts; Mortimer is minimal on biases or speculation, unearths new information, and reveals a man often mentioned but never on an entire spectrum. “The Greatest Traitor” is readable, intriguing on the whole (although highly politically-focused), and recommended for all readers interested in medieval England, Queen Isabella, King Edward II, and King Edward III.
Mortimer’s “The Greatest Traitor” is an ambitious piece meshing together a biography portrait of the life of Roger Mortimer with an analysis of the events surrounding the rise and fall of Edward II, Mortimer alleged affair with Queen Isabella, and Roger’s own eventual demise. Due to the lack of conclusive source material, much of “The Greatest Traitor” especially in the early chapters, is more of a background look at Roger Mortimer’s environment and upbringing in relation to the political atmosphere. In fact, a majority of the content is too politically-charged and can be deemed as slow-moving to those readers not as interested in such material. This results in a piece that appears to leave Roger under a shroud of mystery in terms of his inner-workings and psyche and is therefore more circumstantial.
That being said, Mortimer’s research is mind-blowingly extensive and the amount of information regarding the time period presented in “The Greatest Traitor” is truly amazing; putting the reader on the front lines in an illustrative and accessible way. The events bounce off the pages evoking emotion almost as though Mortimer experienced them first-hand while he was penning the pages.
Also notable, is the absence of biases on Mortimer’s behalf. The incredible amount of sleuth work conducted by Mortimer could have led to a personal bias but Mortimer eschewed opinions and never pushed a specific angle on the pages of “The Greatest Traitor.”
One of the strongest characteristics of “The Greatest Traitor” is the inclusion of content and documents that are new even to those familiar with the subject. This is also expressed through Mortimer’s investigation of the theory exposing King Edward II’s murder as a hoax. The death of King Edward II is a generally accepted one and is thus quite lofty of Mortimer to explore such a lesser-traversed terrain. The issue with this is that Mortimer declares this theory to be fact and truth but doesn’t readily back this up with concise reasoning (Mortimer revisits this topic in an afterword and as will I).
The same can be said of the chapters discussing Queen Isabella’s rumored pregnancy with Roger: Mortimer basically states this as an undisputable truth but the explanations are flimsy and weak at best.
The pace of “The Greatest Traitor” naturally quickens when exploring the rise and fall of Roger’s power. Even though Roger’s private thoughts are not broken down; readers do understand the man on an intimate level by diving into his actions, actions, accounts, household ledgers, etc. Mortimer’s piece-by-piece assembling of the bigger puzzle picture is extraordinary and truly offers an enlightened illumination.
The concluding chapters of “The Greatest Traitor” focus on King Edward III’s growing distaste toward Roger and his consequential downfall. Although a riveting subject, Mortimer’s former extensive breakdown of historical material is absent and the ending “The Greatest Traitor” is rushed and abrupt leaving some unanswered questions. This doesn’t logically make sense with the rest of the book and makes for a weak finality.
After the Epilogue, Mortimer re-examines the theory of the ‘faux’ death of King Edward II attempting to prove its merit. Sadly, the presentation is still inconclusive with bare-bone evidence and doesn’t offer jaw-dropping reading material. However, it is remarkable of Mortimer to offer this material in the first place in the context of it not being readily discussed elsewhere.
Mortimer rounds up “The Greatest Traitor” with an Afterword, Annotated Notes, an itinerary of the whereabouts of Roger Mortimer during his lifetime, a listing of Roger’s offspring, genealogical tables, and a bibliography. Missing from the text are some photo color plates which would have added more spark to the pages.
“The Greatest Traitor” is a passionately researched piece, highly focused on detective work. Although lacking credibility at some parts; Mortimer is minimal on biases or speculation, unearths new information, and reveals a man often mentioned but never on an entire spectrum. “The Greatest Traitor” is readable, intriguing on the whole (although highly politically-focused), and recommended for all readers interested in medieval England, Queen Isabella, King Edward II, and King Edward III.
July 25, 2025
This is an epic read. I loved it.
Sir Roger Mortimer was the 1st Earl of March.
He eventually became the lover of Isabella of France.
She became Queen Consort of England when she wed Edward II of England in 1308.
She was 13 yrs old. (Not Unusual at the time) they had four children. This included her son Edward, who would become King Edward III.
Edward II had a close and controversial relationship with Piers Gaveston, who had joined his household in 1300.
Isabella developed a working relationship with Gaveston in these early years.'
Gaveston's arrogance and power as Edward's favorite provoked discontent both among the barons and the French royal family, and King Edward was forced to exile him.
When he eventually returned,
the Barons executed
Gaveston in 1312.
Edward did not waste time.
The Despenser family, in particular Hugh Despenser the Younger, became close friend and adviser to Edward in 1319.
Isabella could not tolerate the intimate sexual relationship between Edward and Hugh Despenser.
By 1325, her marriage to Edward was at a breaking point.
Earlier in November 1316, Sir Roger Mortimer was appointed Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.
He was imprisoned in the Tower of London in 1322 for having led the marcher lords in a revolt against King Edward II in what became known as the Despenser War
He later escaped to France, where he was joined by Edward's queen consort Isabella. She had been sent by Edward on a diplomatic mission. It was in France where they had started their love affair.
It was now that she may have earned her nickname "She Wolf"
After Sir Mortimer and Isabella led a successful invasion and rebellion.
in 1326, the king was imprisoned in Berkeley Castle in Glouchester.
Hugh Despenser died screaming as he was hanged, drawn, and quartered at Hereford.
After King Edward II was deposed, Mortimer allegedly arranged his murder at Berkeley Castle. There is still controversy over how this murder was done.
For three years, Mortimer was de facto ruler of England before being himself overthrown by Edward's eldest son, Edward III.
Isabella and Mortimer's regime began to crumble, partly because of her lavish spending, but also because the Queen successfully, but unpopularly, resolved long-running problems such as the war with Scotland
Accused of assuming royal power and other crimes, Sir Roger Mortimer was executed by hanging at Tyburn for organizing a revolt against King Edward II in what became known as the Despenser War.
After the execution of Sir Mortimer, Isabella was sent into retirement at a convent of the Sisters of the Poor Clares.
My review is compressed, but the book is rich in solid detail.
An in-depth look at this very complex chain of events.
My review can't do this book justice.
Sir Roger Mortimer was the 1st Earl of March.
He eventually became the lover of Isabella of France.
She became Queen Consort of England when she wed Edward II of England in 1308.
She was 13 yrs old. (Not Unusual at the time) they had four children. This included her son Edward, who would become King Edward III.
Edward II had a close and controversial relationship with Piers Gaveston, who had joined his household in 1300.
Isabella developed a working relationship with Gaveston in these early years.'
Gaveston's arrogance and power as Edward's favorite provoked discontent both among the barons and the French royal family, and King Edward was forced to exile him.
When he eventually returned,
the Barons executed
Gaveston in 1312.
Edward did not waste time.
The Despenser family, in particular Hugh Despenser the Younger, became close friend and adviser to Edward in 1319.
Isabella could not tolerate the intimate sexual relationship between Edward and Hugh Despenser.
By 1325, her marriage to Edward was at a breaking point.
Earlier in November 1316, Sir Roger Mortimer was appointed Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.
He was imprisoned in the Tower of London in 1322 for having led the marcher lords in a revolt against King Edward II in what became known as the Despenser War
He later escaped to France, where he was joined by Edward's queen consort Isabella. She had been sent by Edward on a diplomatic mission. It was in France where they had started their love affair.
It was now that she may have earned her nickname "She Wolf"
After Sir Mortimer and Isabella led a successful invasion and rebellion.
in 1326, the king was imprisoned in Berkeley Castle in Glouchester.
Hugh Despenser died screaming as he was hanged, drawn, and quartered at Hereford.
After King Edward II was deposed, Mortimer allegedly arranged his murder at Berkeley Castle. There is still controversy over how this murder was done.
For three years, Mortimer was de facto ruler of England before being himself overthrown by Edward's eldest son, Edward III.
Isabella and Mortimer's regime began to crumble, partly because of her lavish spending, but also because the Queen successfully, but unpopularly, resolved long-running problems such as the war with Scotland
Accused of assuming royal power and other crimes, Sir Roger Mortimer was executed by hanging at Tyburn for organizing a revolt against King Edward II in what became known as the Despenser War.
After the execution of Sir Mortimer, Isabella was sent into retirement at a convent of the Sisters of the Poor Clares.
My review is compressed, but the book is rich in solid detail.
An in-depth look at this very complex chain of events.
My review can't do this book justice.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 12, 2015
In this book, Professor Mortimer has done his usual excellent job of telling a medieval tale. In looking at the life of Roger Mortimer, the author tells us how Edward II turned probably his ablest military commander into his greatest enemy who ultimately became Edward’s wife's, Isabella, lover and consort.
Roger is one of the fascinating characters that inhabit medieval history. Born in the Welch Marches, he rose to be Edward’s Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and most successful commander. Unfortunately he controlled land that Edward’s favorites, the DeSpencers, wanted and when he fought back, Edward had him arrested for treason and locked up in the Tower of London. Just before the ax was to fall, Roger escapes from the Tower and flees to France. There he becomes Edward’s estranged Queen’s lover and with her plots to depose Edward.
In tracing Roger’s rise, Dr. Mortimer also looks at the reign of Edward II. He looks at the problems his favorite, Hugh DeSpencer the Younger caused. These problems led to the rebellion of his leading nobles including the King's cousin, the Earl of Lancaster and Mortimer. Upon the defeat of the rebellion, Roger was imprisoned in the Tower and the story of escape is one of the highlights of the book.
In telling the story of Mortimer and Isabella’s relationship, Mortimer also tells the story of their conquest of England and Mortimer’s subsequent assumption of power. This was all in the name of Edward and Isabella’s son the future Edward III. After deposing Edward II, Mortimer ruled England in Edward III’s name. However he made many of the same mistakes the DeSpencers made and when Edward III came of age was deposed in turn and hanged in 1330, three years after coming to power.
Dr. Mortimer also looks at the fate of Edward II. He is the first English medieval king to be deposed and is traditionally thought to have been killed on Mortimer’s orders at Berkeley Castle in 1327.
All in all this is a very readable look at Roger Mortimer and the hubris and ambition that took him to the heights of power in medieval England. It is a solid 4 star read.
Roger is one of the fascinating characters that inhabit medieval history. Born in the Welch Marches, he rose to be Edward’s Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and most successful commander. Unfortunately he controlled land that Edward’s favorites, the DeSpencers, wanted and when he fought back, Edward had him arrested for treason and locked up in the Tower of London. Just before the ax was to fall, Roger escapes from the Tower and flees to France. There he becomes Edward’s estranged Queen’s lover and with her plots to depose Edward.
In tracing Roger’s rise, Dr. Mortimer also looks at the reign of Edward II. He looks at the problems his favorite, Hugh DeSpencer the Younger caused. These problems led to the rebellion of his leading nobles including the King's cousin, the Earl of Lancaster and Mortimer. Upon the defeat of the rebellion, Roger was imprisoned in the Tower and the story of escape is one of the highlights of the book.
In telling the story of Mortimer and Isabella’s relationship, Mortimer also tells the story of their conquest of England and Mortimer’s subsequent assumption of power. This was all in the name of Edward and Isabella’s son the future Edward III. After deposing Edward II, Mortimer ruled England in Edward III’s name. However he made many of the same mistakes the DeSpencers made and when Edward III came of age was deposed in turn and hanged in 1330, three years after coming to power.
Dr. Mortimer also looks at the fate of Edward II. He is the first English medieval king to be deposed and is traditionally thought to have been killed on Mortimer’s orders at Berkeley Castle in 1327.
All in all this is a very readable look at Roger Mortimer and the hubris and ambition that took him to the heights of power in medieval England. It is a solid 4 star read.
November 14, 2021
Roger Mortimer has always been one of the more shadowy figures of medieval history, obscured by centuries of historical assumption and oversight and by his own determination to remain the power behind the throne, the figure in the shadows pulling the strings. And that's a shame, because in this excellent biography from Ian Mortimer, he comes across as a truly fascinating figure and quite a sympathetic one too - ironic for a man who quite probably earns the title of 'greatest traitor', who deposed a king, had a passionate affair with the queen, usurped the power of the Crown and ruled through the young Edward III as the true power in the land.
Roger Mortimer's greatest tragedy seems to be that he was not royal - if he'd had even the faintest shadow of a claim to the throne, one suspects he would have proved to be a very good king. He was honest and honourable, utterly loyal to the Crown until pushed too far by Edward II, a skilled tactician and warrior, a good administrator. He made an excellent servant to the Crown until he and many of the other nobles could no longer tolerate Edward II's tyranny, favouritism and mismanagement, and then he made a very very bad enemy.
And from that point on Mortimer's fate was set. The deposition of Edward II was popular, supported by nobles, commons and clergy, and Mortimer's actions to that point could be seen as entirely justified. But once Edward III was in place, Mortimer's actions increasingly became self-defensive, more about preserving his and Queen Isabella's position ruling in the young king's name, than about what was best for the country. And Edward III was only going to grow into his role and chafe against the rule of his mother and her lover.
Ian Mortimer (no relation, I'm sure!) is in my opinion one of the best writers of popular history out there. I have enjoyed every one of his books, and this is as well-written, interesting and engaging as the rest. I was particularly fascinated by his theory on the survival of Edward II, which he presents quite convincingly. Won me over, at any rate. If only all popular history was as enjoyable as this!
Roger Mortimer's greatest tragedy seems to be that he was not royal - if he'd had even the faintest shadow of a claim to the throne, one suspects he would have proved to be a very good king. He was honest and honourable, utterly loyal to the Crown until pushed too far by Edward II, a skilled tactician and warrior, a good administrator. He made an excellent servant to the Crown until he and many of the other nobles could no longer tolerate Edward II's tyranny, favouritism and mismanagement, and then he made a very very bad enemy.
And from that point on Mortimer's fate was set. The deposition of Edward II was popular, supported by nobles, commons and clergy, and Mortimer's actions to that point could be seen as entirely justified. But once Edward III was in place, Mortimer's actions increasingly became self-defensive, more about preserving his and Queen Isabella's position ruling in the young king's name, than about what was best for the country. And Edward III was only going to grow into his role and chafe against the rule of his mother and her lover.
Ian Mortimer (no relation, I'm sure!) is in my opinion one of the best writers of popular history out there. I have enjoyed every one of his books, and this is as well-written, interesting and engaging as the rest. I was particularly fascinated by his theory on the survival of Edward II, which he presents quite convincingly. Won me over, at any rate. If only all popular history was as enjoyable as this!
October 11, 2024
"The stories we read delight us,
but suppose they be nothing but fable?
Then should stories which are true
and which are masterfully told
have double the pleasure in being heard.
The first pleasure lies in the telling,
and the other side in the truth."
-John Barbour "The Bruce"
"Here lies buried, glittering with praise,
Roger the pure, Roger Mortimer the second,
called Lord of Wigmore by those who held him dear.
While he lived all Wales feared his power,
and given as a gift to him, all Wales remained his.
It knew his campaigns, he subjected it to torment."
-epitaph on the tomb of Roger Mortimer, Lord of Wigmore, Grandfather of Sir Roger Mortimer.
Roger of House Mortimer. First of His Name and King of England 1327-1330. Doesn't really ring a bell does it? That's because Mortimer was a "King of England" not actually THE King of England (which would have been either Edward II or Edward III of House Plantagenet). Most people who haven't studied English history might be wondering "Who in the Seven Hells is Roger Mortimer?"
A man who played a pivotal role in English history, he is often overshadowed by the events in which he was entangled. The primary reason is that he is far overshadowed by the other major actors in this real-life soap opera. When one is dealing with Isabella (Queen of England), Edward II (King of England), Edward III (King of England), Charles IV (King of France), etc even a pivotal figure like Roger Mortimer tends to get overshadowed. However, it would not be hyperbole to consider Mortimer to be the fulcrum upon which the balance of power for the Throne of England rested.
Ian Mortimer's (no relation) excellent history of Mortimer is not only a fascinating read but, using new research, it has some fascinating insights. Mortimer was an instrumental figure, and close friend, to Edward II. But, when Edward II begins his infatuation with the Despenser family, and later on, the Galveston family, it will be Mortimer who will lead the charge against them.
Branded a traitor by Edward II, he flees to France where he and Edward's wife, Queen Isabella (The She-Wolf of France), start a relationship and plot to dethrone Edward II. Once this is accomplished, Mortimer loses sight of the goal (to remove Edward II from his nefarious influences) and becomes infatuated with the trappings of power. Added to this is the likely impregnation of the Queen and their dual role as Regent, while attempting to control Edward III.
It is this foolish antagonization of the ruthless Edward III that will lead to his demise. Not only does Mortimer wonderfully detail this entire story but does it in a fashion where history seems to read like a novel.
The other big thesis that I really liked is that Edward II did not die as popularly assumed (red hot poker inserted into rectum via a pre-inserted horn) but rather was indeed alive, later exiled to the Continent, and even had a late meeting with his son, Edward III. I shall not tell you what the information is because I feel you should read this excellent book. The evidence he offers as well s the detailed explanations for why this is the likely scenario makes perfect sense to me and I appreciate the historical record analysis he shows in the final chapter.
Any history book that adds to my knowledge and gives me some new ideas to ponder is one I tend to treasure. This is certainly such a book. If you're interested in this subject matter or would like an excellent history of a very interesting and complex time and characters, then you will love this book. Highly recommended.
but suppose they be nothing but fable?
Then should stories which are true
and which are masterfully told
have double the pleasure in being heard.
The first pleasure lies in the telling,
and the other side in the truth."
-John Barbour "The Bruce"
"Here lies buried, glittering with praise,
Roger the pure, Roger Mortimer the second,
called Lord of Wigmore by those who held him dear.
While he lived all Wales feared his power,
and given as a gift to him, all Wales remained his.
It knew his campaigns, he subjected it to torment."
-epitaph on the tomb of Roger Mortimer, Lord of Wigmore, Grandfather of Sir Roger Mortimer.
Roger of House Mortimer. First of His Name and King of England 1327-1330. Doesn't really ring a bell does it? That's because Mortimer was a "King of England" not actually THE King of England (which would have been either Edward II or Edward III of House Plantagenet). Most people who haven't studied English history might be wondering "Who in the Seven Hells is Roger Mortimer?"
A man who played a pivotal role in English history, he is often overshadowed by the events in which he was entangled. The primary reason is that he is far overshadowed by the other major actors in this real-life soap opera. When one is dealing with Isabella (Queen of England), Edward II (King of England), Edward III (King of England), Charles IV (King of France), etc even a pivotal figure like Roger Mortimer tends to get overshadowed. However, it would not be hyperbole to consider Mortimer to be the fulcrum upon which the balance of power for the Throne of England rested.
Ian Mortimer's (no relation) excellent history of Mortimer is not only a fascinating read but, using new research, it has some fascinating insights. Mortimer was an instrumental figure, and close friend, to Edward II. But, when Edward II begins his infatuation with the Despenser family, and later on, the Galveston family, it will be Mortimer who will lead the charge against them.
Branded a traitor by Edward II, he flees to France where he and Edward's wife, Queen Isabella (The She-Wolf of France), start a relationship and plot to dethrone Edward II. Once this is accomplished, Mortimer loses sight of the goal (to remove Edward II from his nefarious influences) and becomes infatuated with the trappings of power. Added to this is the likely impregnation of the Queen and their dual role as Regent, while attempting to control Edward III.
It is this foolish antagonization of the ruthless Edward III that will lead to his demise. Not only does Mortimer wonderfully detail this entire story but does it in a fashion where history seems to read like a novel.
The other big thesis that I really liked is that Edward II did not die as popularly assumed (red hot poker inserted into rectum via a pre-inserted horn) but rather was indeed alive, later exiled to the Continent, and even had a late meeting with his son, Edward III. I shall not tell you what the information is because I feel you should read this excellent book. The evidence he offers as well s the detailed explanations for why this is the likely scenario makes perfect sense to me and I appreciate the historical record analysis he shows in the final chapter.
Any history book that adds to my knowledge and gives me some new ideas to ponder is one I tend to treasure. This is certainly such a book. If you're interested in this subject matter or would like an excellent history of a very interesting and complex time and characters, then you will love this book. Highly recommended.
April 23, 2009
Another 5 star biography from Ian Mortimer. I read 'The Perfect King', published in 2004, recently, and have now devoured 'The Greatest Traitor', published in 2003. So I've gone against the chronology of history and the authors work.
I can't recommend Ian Mortimer's two books highly enough. The picture that has come down the centuries of Roger Mortimer as the power hungry traitor is shown here to be a very shallow understanding of the man.
The Mortimer was a feudal lord simply caught up in the ruinous reign of Edward II and his 'favourites', firstly Piers Gaveston and then Hugh Despenser.
Roger Mortimer's testosterone adrenelin fuelled life and career beats any Hollywood Errol Flynn character. Merely a baron's son, he fought at Bannockburn, rose to Lieutenant and defeated the Bruce faction in Ireland. Forced by the machinations of Despenser, he became a rebel, which ended with him incarcerated in the Tower of London. In the nick of time, before the nick of an axe, he escaped, to be an exile in France. He returns, as the lover of Edward's estranged Queen Isabella, and leads the first successful invasion of England since The Conqueror.
If all that isn't enough...that is when this fantastic story really takes off, with a medieval conspiracy theory of the deposed Edward II to beat them all!
The hidden truths are expertly laid before the reader with regard to the chronicles accounts of what happened at Berkeley Castle and after.
The final climax comes with Roger Mortimer caught in a Catch 22. Unable to relinquish his hold on the centre of government, as protector of Edward III, fighting ever more desperately to cling onto the reins of power, his Queen and his secrets.
Perhaps I should have read Ian Mortimers two books in the correct order. Either way they are both compulsive, unrelenting page turners.
I can't recommend Ian Mortimer's two books highly enough. The picture that has come down the centuries of Roger Mortimer as the power hungry traitor is shown here to be a very shallow understanding of the man.
The Mortimer was a feudal lord simply caught up in the ruinous reign of Edward II and his 'favourites', firstly Piers Gaveston and then Hugh Despenser.
Roger Mortimer's testosterone adrenelin fuelled life and career beats any Hollywood Errol Flynn character. Merely a baron's son, he fought at Bannockburn, rose to Lieutenant and defeated the Bruce faction in Ireland. Forced by the machinations of Despenser, he became a rebel, which ended with him incarcerated in the Tower of London. In the nick of time, before the nick of an axe, he escaped, to be an exile in France. He returns, as the lover of Edward's estranged Queen Isabella, and leads the first successful invasion of England since The Conqueror.
If all that isn't enough...that is when this fantastic story really takes off, with a medieval conspiracy theory of the deposed Edward II to beat them all!
The hidden truths are expertly laid before the reader with regard to the chronicles accounts of what happened at Berkeley Castle and after.
The final climax comes with Roger Mortimer caught in a Catch 22. Unable to relinquish his hold on the centre of government, as protector of Edward III, fighting ever more desperately to cling onto the reins of power, his Queen and his secrets.
Perhaps I should have read Ian Mortimers two books in the correct order. Either way they are both compulsive, unrelenting page turners.
May 12, 2021
Fantastic narration of the Battle of Bannockburn, engrossing detective work by this medievalist into the fate of Edward II, and a detailed look at an England caught up in corruption, deceit, and ambition.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
November 27, 2015
Mortimer was always going to have go that 'extra mile' of horribleness for me to hate this book. Maybe if he had written in a James Patterson flatness mixed with a Stephanie Meyer style that had Queen Isabella sitting across from Roger Mortimer sulking about who loved who the most, I may have thrown this book at a wall. But lets be honest writing that badly about this kind of story would have taken too much effort.
The story of Roger Mortimer, Queen Isabella and poor Edward II is pure exquisite narrative. It has everything you could want, the high Knight turned traitor then corrupt politician, the spirited vengeful Queen and her adulterous affair with said corrupt Knight, the weak King who could not hold on to his Kingdom with the whiff of pretty favourites whispering in his ear. The young Prince having to make the decision to stand on his own two feet and rule England in his own right. Power, sex, revenge, love, murder, love and greed, seriously what more could a person want?
Roger Mortimer is an enigmatic figure in Medieval history, but beautifully fascinating. Mortimer was able to track the motivations of all the players beautifully. I could read about this period of Edward II reign over and over again, each character throws everything into a different light, and even though this was a biography on Roger Mortimer, the author Mortimer understands this completely.
I am complete history nut, and this biography was like finding the good pure stuff. It made me dizzy with happiness.
The story of Roger Mortimer, Queen Isabella and poor Edward II is pure exquisite narrative. It has everything you could want, the high Knight turned traitor then corrupt politician, the spirited vengeful Queen and her adulterous affair with said corrupt Knight, the weak King who could not hold on to his Kingdom with the whiff of pretty favourites whispering in his ear. The young Prince having to make the decision to stand on his own two feet and rule England in his own right. Power, sex, revenge, love, murder, love and greed, seriously what more could a person want?
Roger Mortimer is an enigmatic figure in Medieval history, but beautifully fascinating. Mortimer was able to track the motivations of all the players beautifully. I could read about this period of Edward II reign over and over again, each character throws everything into a different light, and even though this was a biography on Roger Mortimer, the author Mortimer understands this completely.
I am complete history nut, and this biography was like finding the good pure stuff. It made me dizzy with happiness.
September 14, 2016
I enjoyed reading this book. Ian Mortimer's prose is never dry or tedious, and he makes the best possible case for Roger Mortimer. Plenty of interest along the way, and the book complements Kathryn Warner's excellent book on Edward II, giving as it were the other side of the coin. I was surprised by how good a servant Mortimer had been to Edward II up until the rise of Hugh Despenser, after which all bets were off.
If I have a criticism it is that certain inconvenient facts are left out - notably the shameful treatment of the innocent Despenser children.
However, make no mistake, this is a book well worth reading, especially if you want a deeper and better understanding of Roger Mortimer.
It is interesting that Ian Mortimer concurs with the view that Edward II survived his alleged murder; indeed a very good examination of the facts will be found here. (less)
If I have a criticism it is that certain inconvenient facts are left out - notably the shameful treatment of the innocent Despenser children.
However, make no mistake, this is a book well worth reading, especially if you want a deeper and better understanding of Roger Mortimer.
It is interesting that Ian Mortimer concurs with the view that Edward II survived his alleged murder; indeed a very good examination of the facts will be found here. (less)
September 18, 2014
If you are into detailed accounts of medieval history, this is excellent! The author has done so much research and found new evidence that changes the story we know of Edward II. The author's style is easy and entertaining. This book makes you think of Mortimer and Isabella in a more well-rounded way without excusing their behaviors and actions.
December 6, 2019
I like Ian Mortimer as an author, he writes with authority, and has a way of keeping the readers attention, although you can't really go wrong with a life of Sir Roger Mortimer. Interesting chap to say the least.
Knight of the realm, is imprisoned in, and then escapes from the tower of London, shacks up with the kings estranged wife, invades the country, deposes the king and arranges his death (or not, as the author is one of a growing group of historians who think that Edward II actually survived), but then ends up getting hanged by the king's son.
And people say that history is dull.
Knight of the realm, is imprisoned in, and then escapes from the tower of London, shacks up with the kings estranged wife, invades the country, deposes the king and arranges his death (or not, as the author is one of a growing group of historians who think that Edward II actually survived), but then ends up getting hanged by the king's son.
And people say that history is dull.
March 31, 2016
This book gives a pretty good impression of 14th century aristocratic England by following the life story of one extraordinary man. The author uses the book as a vehicle for sometimes very daring theses. The central thesis, that Roger Mortimer did not kill king Edward II as had been historical consensus for centuries, is introduced somewhat offhandedly and only substantiated in the last chapter. This makes seem much of the last third of the book seem pretty far out on a limb, but good evidence for it is given in the final chapter.
I cannot finish without one quote though, which shows the author's twisted understanding of love and view of women though: "There is no reason to doubt that Roger did love Isabella deeply, as shown by his blurted out threat to kill her if she returned to her husband in 1325."
Ian Mortimer writes engagingly and in deep detail about historical events and circumstances, but having read two of his books I don't think I need to read another one.
I cannot finish without one quote though, which shows the author's twisted understanding of love and view of women though: "There is no reason to doubt that Roger did love Isabella deeply, as shown by his blurted out threat to kill her if she returned to her husband in 1325."
Ian Mortimer writes engagingly and in deep detail about historical events and circumstances, but having read two of his books I don't think I need to read another one.
September 5, 2025
Easy to read, easy to follow. I loved this book. I didn’t know very much about Roger Mortimer but just assumed he was this low no good man. He was a warrior , a leader, a general a fighter a loyal soldier, a friend and childhood companion of king Edward II , a father and husband. He lived in Edward I household and was a loyal friend of Edward II. He fought in wars for Edward II. This book details his life in battles. Edward II misplaced his loyalty in favorites. This was to the detriment of the people and Roger Mortimer eventually turned against the king and was imprisoned. This was the start of his downfall and finally charged with treason. I changed my opinion of him. He was loyal and was for the rights of his country and king. At the end he was greedy and Edward III became king. I’m glad I read it. I learned a lot
March 24, 2020
George Martin's GOT has nothing on this real life game of thrones. Fascinating story.
September 29, 2023
An engaging and thoroughly researched read on the life of Roger Mortimer, best known for collaborating with the then-Queen of England to overthrow the King. Mortimer comes alive in these pages as a complex figure: a skilled and ruthless military leader, able administrator, and savvy politician, but unfortunately not immune to the then-ubiquitous disease of letting power go to his head. The author (Ian Mortimer, no relation to Roger) dives deep into the archives to illustrate the circumstances of Roger Mortimer's upbringing, his military achievements, his personal tastes for luxury and opulence, and the tragic arc of his career: from respected royalist to righteous rebel to greedy, power-obsessed warlord every bit as corrupt as the people he overthrew. How the wheel of fortune turns! Or put another way, he lived long enough to see himself become the villain.
I have to dock a star, however, for the author's contention that Roger Mortimer had kept Edward II alive instead of executing him in 1327. Granted, I am no historian and I have not waded through the evidence in nearly as much detail as the author clearly has. But as an American living in 2023, I can smell a conspiracy theory from a mile away. So I'm going to apply the classic conspiracy theory reality check: How many people would have had to be "in" on the secret for history to have played out as it did? The answer is, way too many! Not only would Mortimer, Isabella, and Edward III have had to keep this secret if the author is to be believed, so would the people involved in his burial, the people who pretended to guard him but actually kept him alive, the people who brought him food and clothing, the people who let him free, their guards and retainers, countless random citizens who would have run into Edward II on the street, any nobleman or clergyman who could have encountered Edward by chance and put two and two together… Trust me, if there was a deposed King of England out there who was believed to be murdered but was actually alive, you would be looking at a completely different political situation than what actually played out. It wouldn't matter if Edward himself was determined to go incognito and live a quiet life. Notoriety has a habit of following notorious people, especially someone who was already known across Europe for making poor decisions and being easily exploited, and especially during such an unstable time when the existence of a secretly-alive former King of England could have changed the course of history. I'm sorry to say this but I'm pretty sure in this case it makes the most sense to go to with Occam's Razor and conclude that Edward was indeed murdered (or died of natural causes, but I really doubt this) in 1327. Probably not by a red-hot poker (Ian Mortimer does a good job refuting this particular myth), but dead nonetheless.
I have to dock a star, however, for the author's contention that Roger Mortimer had kept Edward II alive instead of executing him in 1327. Granted, I am no historian and I have not waded through the evidence in nearly as much detail as the author clearly has. But as an American living in 2023, I can smell a conspiracy theory from a mile away. So I'm going to apply the classic conspiracy theory reality check: How many people would have had to be "in" on the secret for history to have played out as it did? The answer is, way too many! Not only would Mortimer, Isabella, and Edward III have had to keep this secret if the author is to be believed, so would the people involved in his burial, the people who pretended to guard him but actually kept him alive, the people who brought him food and clothing, the people who let him free, their guards and retainers, countless random citizens who would have run into Edward II on the street, any nobleman or clergyman who could have encountered Edward by chance and put two and two together… Trust me, if there was a deposed King of England out there who was believed to be murdered but was actually alive, you would be looking at a completely different political situation than what actually played out. It wouldn't matter if Edward himself was determined to go incognito and live a quiet life. Notoriety has a habit of following notorious people, especially someone who was already known across Europe for making poor decisions and being easily exploited, and especially during such an unstable time when the existence of a secretly-alive former King of England could have changed the course of history. I'm sorry to say this but I'm pretty sure in this case it makes the most sense to go to with Occam's Razor and conclude that Edward was indeed murdered (or died of natural causes, but I really doubt this) in 1327. Probably not by a red-hot poker (Ian Mortimer does a good job refuting this particular myth), but dead nonetheless.
February 15, 2025
Now I did enjoy this book, but out of all the books I have read by this author I do think it might be the weakest. The perfect king is one of my all time favourite books and this one unfortunately didn’t quite live up to that standard. Now that’s not to say I didn’t like this one, I did it just didn’t capture me in the same way.
This book is well written and easy to follow. It takes you through the facts in a chronological way which often feels like reading a story. There is no issue with the writing itself and I feel even people who are new to history books could read this quite happily. It is definitely accessible!
I guess the reason I don’t like this one as much as the others is because I feel like the it attempts to paint Roger Mortimer in a much better light than he deserves (in my opinion). I won’t go into specific details but I just feel that if Edward II had chosen him to be his favourite instead of Gaveston and Despenser he wouldn’t have rebelled. He showed he could be just a brutal, cunning, arrogant and tyrannical as both those other men he just didn’t get the opportunity until after he rebelled. I honestly think if he had been the favourite he would have let Edward II give him everything and treat him like he was special. However, because he wasn’t chosen he rebelled, did everything he could to gain power and became a tyrant anyway. Either way, I cannot get past his actions towards the end especially his manipulation on Edward III so I am glad he got his just desserts.
I also really dislike the authors theory on Edward II he mentions it in the perfect king and again in this. To be honest, I skim read it as I do think it’s absolutely ridiculous but again this is a personal preference.
I would recommend this book for people who have a specific interest in Roger Mortimer or Edward II. If not though, it’s not a history book I would be quick to recommend. I am glad I read it though!
This book is well written and easy to follow. It takes you through the facts in a chronological way which often feels like reading a story. There is no issue with the writing itself and I feel even people who are new to history books could read this quite happily. It is definitely accessible!
I guess the reason I don’t like this one as much as the others is because I feel like the it attempts to paint Roger Mortimer in a much better light than he deserves (in my opinion). I won’t go into specific details but I just feel that if Edward II had chosen him to be his favourite instead of Gaveston and Despenser he wouldn’t have rebelled. He showed he could be just a brutal, cunning, arrogant and tyrannical as both those other men he just didn’t get the opportunity until after he rebelled. I honestly think if he had been the favourite he would have let Edward II give him everything and treat him like he was special. However, because he wasn’t chosen he rebelled, did everything he could to gain power and became a tyrant anyway. Either way, I cannot get past his actions towards the end especially his manipulation on Edward III so I am glad he got his just desserts.
I also really dislike the authors theory on Edward II he mentions it in the perfect king and again in this. To be honest, I skim read it as I do think it’s absolutely ridiculous but again this is a personal preference.
I would recommend this book for people who have a specific interest in Roger Mortimer or Edward II. If not though, it’s not a history book I would be quick to recommend. I am glad I read it though!
March 6, 2022
3.5 stars
Sir Roger Mortimer was close to Edward II when they were younger, but because Edward didn’t listen to anyone beyond his favourites while he was ruling, he turned many people away from him, including Mortimer. Later on, it seems Mortimer and Edward’s wife, Queen Isabella, carried on a dalliance. Most historians agree that Mortimer had Edward II murdered, while Mortimer and Isabella “ruled” through Edward III (Edward II and Isabella’s teenaged son). This author suggests something a little bit different to Edward II’s end, however.
This was nonfiction, so it took a while to read. It also took a bit for me to get interested, but I did like it maybe starting about 1/3 of the way in or so (or maybe a bit before that). It also got me curious about Robert (the) Bruce in Scotland. I’m not sure about Mortimer (the author)’s proposal for what happened to Edward II, but it was interesting to read about. That being said, I have not read anything about Roger Mortimer before this (except likely in reading about Isabella). I liked the way the author presented his alternate theory. He went through everything to the end of Roger’s life, then backed up with a chapter called “Chapter Twelve Revisited”, which explained what he thinks might have happened instead.
Sir Roger Mortimer was close to Edward II when they were younger, but because Edward didn’t listen to anyone beyond his favourites while he was ruling, he turned many people away from him, including Mortimer. Later on, it seems Mortimer and Edward’s wife, Queen Isabella, carried on a dalliance. Most historians agree that Mortimer had Edward II murdered, while Mortimer and Isabella “ruled” through Edward III (Edward II and Isabella’s teenaged son). This author suggests something a little bit different to Edward II’s end, however.
This was nonfiction, so it took a while to read. It also took a bit for me to get interested, but I did like it maybe starting about 1/3 of the way in or so (or maybe a bit before that). It also got me curious about Robert (the) Bruce in Scotland. I’m not sure about Mortimer (the author)’s proposal for what happened to Edward II, but it was interesting to read about. That being said, I have not read anything about Roger Mortimer before this (except likely in reading about Isabella). I liked the way the author presented his alternate theory. He went through everything to the end of Roger’s life, then backed up with a chapter called “Chapter Twelve Revisited”, which explained what he thinks might have happened instead.
May 26, 2024
One of medieval history’s most enigmatic figures, Sir Roger Mortimer, 1st Earl of March, finally gets some much needed time in the spotlight in this phenomenal biography. Ian Mortimer has such a wonderful way of writing, he really knows how to get inside the head of a medieval person and bring them to life for his readers. Anyone who thinks historical biographies are dry and boring needs to read this, as it will certainly change your mind. It reads more like a novel, and is exciting and immersive from the very first page. This book also taught me so many things I didn’t know about the charismatic Sir Roger, as well as answering some pre-existing questions I had about why he took some of the decisions and actions that he did. I feel like I understand him so much better now. Also, although I don’t necessarily agree with him, Ian Mortimer puts forward a very interesting theory about what might have happened to King Edward II after he was deposed in 1327. His theory is certainly plausible, and it has given me plenty of food for thought.
Even though it’s only May, I am going to predict that this book will be one of my favourite books of 2024. It really is that good.
Even though it’s only May, I am going to predict that this book will be one of my favourite books of 2024. It really is that good.
December 19, 2024
An interesting biography of a little-known and yet arguably hugely consequential figure in English history, given he ranks among the few regicides we have produced. Definitely a product of its time, Mortimer’s biography seeks to re-evaluate Roger Mortimer and study him throughout his life to see if his reputation is warranted. While it was a good biographical account, it definitely fell short of the mark on a number of points.
This was a traditional ‘great-man’ history which I actually found too revisionist for my liking. It presented what are at best historical theories, e.g. that Edward II survived, as fact and often looked for ways to present Mortimer’s motives as noble, even when a more sceptical analysis might have offered a better avenue of understanding his true motives. I also felt when it came to the dictatorship part, the author went too far in minimising Isabella’s influence, which would likely be challenged by more recent works on female agency and queenly political influence at court.
Overall a detailed standalone biography, but definitely falls short at times of historical veracity and truthfulness in its portrayal of its subject.
This was a traditional ‘great-man’ history which I actually found too revisionist for my liking. It presented what are at best historical theories, e.g. that Edward II survived, as fact and often looked for ways to present Mortimer’s motives as noble, even when a more sceptical analysis might have offered a better avenue of understanding his true motives. I also felt when it came to the dictatorship part, the author went too far in minimising Isabella’s influence, which would likely be challenged by more recent works on female agency and queenly political influence at court.
Overall a detailed standalone biography, but definitely falls short at times of historical veracity and truthfulness in its portrayal of its subject.
April 26, 2018
Well-written, interesting, and fair on both Mortimer and Edward II (whom I've always had a bit of a soft-spot for as a result of the Jarmen film) - until (spiller alert!) we get to the conspiracy theory about Edward II surviving as a pilgrim in Italy.
August 23, 2025
A very interesting insight into Sir Roger Mortimer and the reign of Edward II. Ian crams a great deal into this book, though I did find some parts a bit too academic for my liking. Nevertheless, it left me with a lot to think about and even more places in the UK and Ireland I'd like to visit.
December 16, 2019
I find it revealing and more than a little bit of interesting that the author is at pains to mention that he is not a descendant of his subject, even though the fact that they have the same last name is likely to give some impetus to the author's efforts at somewhat clearing the name of a notorious English traitor. Of interest as well is that a one-time friend of mine once played a character in a historical simulation game that was part of the Mortimer family and whose claims to English leadership he wholeheartedly supported. I wonder how he would feel about this book's subject. At any rate, this book rather straightforwardly seeks to look at the life and career of Roger Mortimer and how it was that he was able to achieve a great deal of power but also create a lot of problems for himself because of the envy and insecurity of the position he had made for himself when he pushed aside King Edward II and been the paramour of Queen Isabella and regent for Edward III until that young man took the throne into his own hands and put Roger to death.
This particular book is a bit more than 250 pages and is divided into 14 mostly small chapters, along with various supplementary material that serves as the first ever scholarly biography of this maligned man. The book begins with maps, an author's note, acknowledgements, and an introduction. After that the author discusses the inheritance of Roger de Mortimer from his family background and reputation (1) as well as his youth (2) and his young adulthood as the friend of King Edward II (3). The author then discusses the disasters of Bannockburn and Kells that he was involved with against Scotland (4) and his time as the King's Lieutenant (5) and kinsman (6) before rebelling when Hugh Dispenser became a favorite (7). The author then discusses Mortimer's imprisonment (8) and escape (9) as well as his successful invasion of England with the Queen at his side (10) and their revolutionary attack on Edward II's rule (11). The author explores the question of whether Mortimer killed Edward II as has long been held (12 and in an appendix) and looks at Mortimer's regency (13) as well as the latter part of his rule over England that ended in a brutal death (14), after which the author discusses the repercussions of that death and provides an afterward. There are also notes, two appendices, a select bibliography, genealogical tables, and an index.
I must admit that the author is far more sympathetic to Roger Mortimer than I would be. That said, I must admit that my own populist tastes and my own interest in seeing justice done to someone slandered in history did give me at least some sympathy for the man, more so than for many in the period. Roger's loyalty to his uncle and his efforts at maintaining justice and equity in England are certainly praiseworthy, and it is lamentable that his efforts foundered because he had such an insecure place as a nonroyal who lacked a high degree of legitimacy and made a lot of powerful enemies, including ultimately King Edward III, after possibly having a child with the queen mother. Indeed, Mortimer's treachery, his abuses of power later in his reign, and his adultery limit my own approval of the man, but I can definitely give at least a little bit of praise to someone who managed to rise to power on his own competence, generally sought the well-being of the realm, and also sought to get rid of a king without putting him to death. All of that is worthy of some praise, and for him not to be entirely hated in history. That said, if he was something of a model for someone like Oliver Cromwell, it is easy to see why those who are partisans of royals would find much to dislike about his behavior and the way he was able to rise to power for a short time.
This particular book is a bit more than 250 pages and is divided into 14 mostly small chapters, along with various supplementary material that serves as the first ever scholarly biography of this maligned man. The book begins with maps, an author's note, acknowledgements, and an introduction. After that the author discusses the inheritance of Roger de Mortimer from his family background and reputation (1) as well as his youth (2) and his young adulthood as the friend of King Edward II (3). The author then discusses the disasters of Bannockburn and Kells that he was involved with against Scotland (4) and his time as the King's Lieutenant (5) and kinsman (6) before rebelling when Hugh Dispenser became a favorite (7). The author then discusses Mortimer's imprisonment (8) and escape (9) as well as his successful invasion of England with the Queen at his side (10) and their revolutionary attack on Edward II's rule (11). The author explores the question of whether Mortimer killed Edward II as has long been held (12 and in an appendix) and looks at Mortimer's regency (13) as well as the latter part of his rule over England that ended in a brutal death (14), after which the author discusses the repercussions of that death and provides an afterward. There are also notes, two appendices, a select bibliography, genealogical tables, and an index.
I must admit that the author is far more sympathetic to Roger Mortimer than I would be. That said, I must admit that my own populist tastes and my own interest in seeing justice done to someone slandered in history did give me at least some sympathy for the man, more so than for many in the period. Roger's loyalty to his uncle and his efforts at maintaining justice and equity in England are certainly praiseworthy, and it is lamentable that his efforts foundered because he had such an insecure place as a nonroyal who lacked a high degree of legitimacy and made a lot of powerful enemies, including ultimately King Edward III, after possibly having a child with the queen mother. Indeed, Mortimer's treachery, his abuses of power later in his reign, and his adultery limit my own approval of the man, but I can definitely give at least a little bit of praise to someone who managed to rise to power on his own competence, generally sought the well-being of the realm, and also sought to get rid of a king without putting him to death. All of that is worthy of some praise, and for him not to be entirely hated in history. That said, if he was something of a model for someone like Oliver Cromwell, it is easy to see why those who are partisans of royals would find much to dislike about his behavior and the way he was able to rise to power for a short time.
March 11, 2014
Having finished Alison Weir's biography of Isabella, I immediately turned to that of her love Roger Mortimer. It was interesting to read the two back to back and hear the perspectives as each author defended their favorite.
It cannot be denied that my reading of Weir's book influenced my impression of Mortimer's. The Greatest Traitor was much better written in terms of clarity and pacing, often reading like a novel with cliffhanger chapter endings. However, such elements are far more annoying in a biography, I found.
Similarly, one of my biggest problems with Weir's book was that it was dry and repetitive, with an insane number of footnotes. When Weir drew conclusions, you generally understood how she reached them, and often heard opposing perspectives. This isn't the case with Mortimer, who seems to make large leaps in his conclusions and expects you to ride with him. The tone of his book is strongly tainted, while Weir at least attempts a more balanced approach.
Similarly, Weir often provides more details into issues that affected both players. The sham trial of Lancaster and subsequent punishment reflected the same way Lancaster treated the kings' favorite years prior, but no mention of this is made, perhaps because it humanizes the lost felt by Edward II. Similarly, the broad strokes that led Mortimer to conclude the early duration of Isabella and Mortimer's affair felt unsubstantiated, as did the machinations he described of the queen who, by his version, went to France plotting treason.
Some of the information conflicted, leaving me uncertain which conclusion to draw. Mortimer states that the king of France requested the presence of Edward III before Isabella joined him, while Weir stated that the suggestion came after.
Both authors also subscribed to the 'keep Edward II alive' conspiracy, though Mortimer at least offers a reason that his ancestor might have done so. I still find the idea of the plot tenuous; I subscribe to Occam's Razer, and think the simplest thing to be done - murder Edward II -most likely was.
The short version, then, is that Mortimer's book was more entertaining and less complicated to read, but that I questioned most of his conclusions.
It cannot be denied that my reading of Weir's book influenced my impression of Mortimer's. The Greatest Traitor was much better written in terms of clarity and pacing, often reading like a novel with cliffhanger chapter endings. However, such elements are far more annoying in a biography, I found.
Similarly, one of my biggest problems with Weir's book was that it was dry and repetitive, with an insane number of footnotes. When Weir drew conclusions, you generally understood how she reached them, and often heard opposing perspectives. This isn't the case with Mortimer, who seems to make large leaps in his conclusions and expects you to ride with him. The tone of his book is strongly tainted, while Weir at least attempts a more balanced approach.
Similarly, Weir often provides more details into issues that affected both players. The sham trial of Lancaster and subsequent punishment reflected the same way Lancaster treated the kings' favorite years prior, but no mention of this is made, perhaps because it humanizes the lost felt by Edward II. Similarly, the broad strokes that led Mortimer to conclude the early duration of Isabella and Mortimer's affair felt unsubstantiated, as did the machinations he described of the queen who, by his version, went to France plotting treason.
Some of the information conflicted, leaving me uncertain which conclusion to draw. Mortimer states that the king of France requested the presence of Edward III before Isabella joined him, while Weir stated that the suggestion came after.
Both authors also subscribed to the 'keep Edward II alive' conspiracy, though Mortimer at least offers a reason that his ancestor might have done so. I still find the idea of the plot tenuous; I subscribe to Occam's Razer, and think the simplest thing to be done - murder Edward II -most likely was.
The short version, then, is that Mortimer's book was more entertaining and less complicated to read, but that I questioned most of his conclusions.
June 13, 2012
August first, 1323. Tonight is the feast of St Peter ad Vincula, or Saint Peter in Chains, the patron saint of the Tower of London. There’s quite a party going on in the hall of the royal palace; the lieutenant in charge of the castle has passed out already—in fact, quite a few of the attendees are more drunk than their usual, as if they all suddenly forgot how to hold their wine. All except for the sub-lieutenant, young Gerard d’Alspaye who, strangely enough, has not had a drink. But then, he knows what’s in the wine.
As the revelers slip into unconsciousness at the feast, Gerard d’Alspaye slips out of the hall and up the tower with a crowbar and a rope. There, he begins to pry loose the ancient stones from their mortar to release his friend from his cell. The prisoner, a rebel baron called Sir Roger Mortimer, had been arrested for defying King Edward II and his advisor and close friend Hugh Despenser. Their autocratic rule of the country has turned many of the nobility against them, including the queen herself, which is probably how Mortimer found out about the plan to kill him later that month. To save his life, his friends are breaking him out of the Tower of London.
None of them could know that by 1327, Mortimer will be the de facto ruler of England. He will have Isabella, the King’s own beautiful wife, as his ally. Together they will conquer England and depose the king who imprisoned him. One day, not so very far from now, Mortimer will be accused of murdering the exiled king at Berkeley Castle. He will have to defend himself to his political enemies, including the son of the dead king.
But right now, he is only the prisoner in the tower, listening to the sound of Gerard d’Alspaye’s crowbar chipping away at the mortar as he widens the hole in the stone wall. Even Mortimer himself does not yet know his fate, how he will conquer England or depose the King or what will happen on a certain night in the future at Berkeley castle. He can see freedom through the hole and exile as well, but he cannot know that he will be the Greatest Traitor in English history.
As the revelers slip into unconsciousness at the feast, Gerard d’Alspaye slips out of the hall and up the tower with a crowbar and a rope. There, he begins to pry loose the ancient stones from their mortar to release his friend from his cell. The prisoner, a rebel baron called Sir Roger Mortimer, had been arrested for defying King Edward II and his advisor and close friend Hugh Despenser. Their autocratic rule of the country has turned many of the nobility against them, including the queen herself, which is probably how Mortimer found out about the plan to kill him later that month. To save his life, his friends are breaking him out of the Tower of London.
None of them could know that by 1327, Mortimer will be the de facto ruler of England. He will have Isabella, the King’s own beautiful wife, as his ally. Together they will conquer England and depose the king who imprisoned him. One day, not so very far from now, Mortimer will be accused of murdering the exiled king at Berkeley Castle. He will have to defend himself to his political enemies, including the son of the dead king.
But right now, he is only the prisoner in the tower, listening to the sound of Gerard d’Alspaye’s crowbar chipping away at the mortar as he widens the hole in the stone wall. Even Mortimer himself does not yet know his fate, how he will conquer England or depose the King or what will happen on a certain night in the future at Berkeley castle. He can see freedom through the hole and exile as well, but he cannot know that he will be the Greatest Traitor in English history.
June 5, 2014
I was quite disappointed in this book as I know Ian Mortimer is a bona fide historian. Although he had obviously done a lot of research and gave some interesting insights into Mortimer's life and times, he spends far too much time on the theory that Edward II was not murdered in 1327 but was actually kept a prisoner by Mortimer until the latter died - after that he is somewhat vague on what happened to the former king. Every event that suggests Edward died is dismissed or glossed over, whilst circumstances that support the theory are given huge amounts of attention, even when they are open to interpretation. I consider this poor judgement on his part and for that reason I didn't really enjoy the book.
November 27, 2019
First published in 2003, 'The Greatest Traitor' tells the story of Sir Roger Mortimer who, in the early 14th century, led a rebellion that overthrew the English monarch Edward II, left his wife for Queen Isabella and effectively ruled England from 1327-1330. The tale has some gruesome moments, and provides plenty of evidence for the old adage 'absolute power corrupts absolutely'. Reading at times like a real life 'Hamlet', yet another example of fact being immensely more incredible than fiction.
September 24, 2015
I thought that Mortimer did a very good job on showing both Mortimer's rise and his eventual fall. What I didn't get was his claim that Edward II was not murdered as is ordinarily believed. He's a reputable historian as far as I know, and not a kook, but I just don't see why Mortimer would have kept him alive. Ian Mortimer (to distinguish him) gives reasons but they don't make sense to me.
December 17, 2022
The Greatest Traitor by Ian Mortimer is a study of a marcher lord, Sir Roger Mortimer who rose to become ruler of England, practically an uncrowned King, for three years. This is a thrilling account of a turbulent period at the beginning of the 14th Century during the rule of King Edward II and a successful partnership with Edward’s own wife to usurp him. Mortimer paints Sir Roger as a loyal vassal who is forced into his actions by a tyrannical and somewhat capricious ruler whose favourite was attacking Roger’s interests. Ultimately Roger is drawn along almost of necessity to protect himself, his relatives and retainers so leading a famous overthrow of the King. A revolt known mostly for the untimely end of the King reputedly by a hot poker up the backside.
It is odd that Sir Roger is a neglected subject given his importance in these events and the power he gained. Perhaps because a usurper is always somehow tainted? But this book fills the gap well. It is nicely balanced between being a popular history by approach which is a narrative biographical history that is nice and readable. And at the same time it is academic with clearly a lot of work having gone into researching the subject.
I particularly like that this book includes bits on Sir Roger’s personality, something that can be difficult to find for medieval figures. And even more so his wife Joan’s – we are told about books of romances Sir Roger buys for her (p.164). Some of this kind of information is based on speculation, but there is always some source, and it really helps built the colour of the characters. I don’t think this is a problem so long as the author makes sure the reader knows what is from sources and what is building from that direct information into the likely.
As always there are quibbles. Somehow every book that is about an invasion of England needs to say it is the last (or most successful or something!) In this case the last successful one. But it is difficult to see how if this overthrow is seen as a successful invasion that the glorious revolution of 1688 would not be – in many ways they are quite similar being mostly driven by an internal faction.
Surprise! It is not often you get a really big surprise in a history book but for me this book provided one. I will tread gingerly around it to avoid spoilers for anyone else for whom it may also be a surprise. I do however have issues with the theory. Not surprisingly there is not much documentary evidence, and much of it is negative evidence which it not always convincing. Still Mortimer builds quite a good case and it is an interesting theory but I am ultimately not sure about how such an important person could drop out of history even if this is the Middle Ages.
This is a book to recommend for anyone interested in the Middle Ages but is tired of just reading about the Kings. Sir Roger is a magnate who works his way up and stretches the limits of what is possible in the period in which he lived. Mortimer makes him relatable in a way that it is sometimes difficult to relate to a King.
It is odd that Sir Roger is a neglected subject given his importance in these events and the power he gained. Perhaps because a usurper is always somehow tainted? But this book fills the gap well. It is nicely balanced between being a popular history by approach which is a narrative biographical history that is nice and readable. And at the same time it is academic with clearly a lot of work having gone into researching the subject.
I particularly like that this book includes bits on Sir Roger’s personality, something that can be difficult to find for medieval figures. And even more so his wife Joan’s – we are told about books of romances Sir Roger buys for her (p.164). Some of this kind of information is based on speculation, but there is always some source, and it really helps built the colour of the characters. I don’t think this is a problem so long as the author makes sure the reader knows what is from sources and what is building from that direct information into the likely.
As always there are quibbles. Somehow every book that is about an invasion of England needs to say it is the last (or most successful or something!) In this case the last successful one. But it is difficult to see how if this overthrow is seen as a successful invasion that the glorious revolution of 1688 would not be – in many ways they are quite similar being mostly driven by an internal faction.
Surprise! It is not often you get a really big surprise in a history book but for me this book provided one. I will tread gingerly around it to avoid spoilers for anyone else for whom it may also be a surprise. I do however have issues with the theory. Not surprisingly there is not much documentary evidence, and much of it is negative evidence which it not always convincing. Still Mortimer builds quite a good case and it is an interesting theory but I am ultimately not sure about how such an important person could drop out of history even if this is the Middle Ages.
This is a book to recommend for anyone interested in the Middle Ages but is tired of just reading about the Kings. Sir Roger is a magnate who works his way up and stretches the limits of what is possible in the period in which he lived. Mortimer makes him relatable in a way that it is sometimes difficult to relate to a King.
October 17, 2018
Roger Mortimer often features as something of the boogie man in the narratives about Edward II and Isabella of France. With Isabella, Roger led the rebellion that resulted in Edward II’s deposition and shockingly vile murder (at least, that’s how the story goes), and though he may be characterised as a dashing romantic hero who rescued Isabella from her unhappy marriage, he is frequently is blamed for the ills and tyranny that characterised their rule of England during Edward III’s minority.
Yet while “boogie man” may be an easy label to give Roger, it is not perhaps fair to the man, and so historian Ian Mortimer’s The Greatest Traitor sets out to find the man behind the villainous role.
The Greatest Traitor was a sheer joy to read. Mortimer’s writing was engaging and clear, it was so easy to get swept along and want to read another chapter. There are times where I felt that Mortimer was too dramatic, perhaps showing more of a novelist’s flair than a historian’s objective stance, but these were often few enough that it didn’t seriously detract from the experience of reading.
The scholarship, I felt, was top-notch. It was first published in 2003 and shows its age in some ways (for instance, Mortimer now thinks he needs to rewrite this book to firstly deal with Edward II's death and because he no longer believes Roger and Isabella were lovers), but Mortimer’s arguments are logical and easy to follow. I never felt lost or confused about his conclusions. I don’t know if I believe Edward II lived past his traditional date of death (perhaps because “this historical person secretly survived” narratives always seem too good to be true at first and then seem terribly depressing if real), but Mortimer’s arguments are convincing.
Finally, I appreciated Mortimer’s approach. I wasn’t someone who thought a lot about Roger Mortimer but was inclined to think poorly of him. Having read this, I feel that he is a lot more complicated than I initially thought and again, shows that historical figures are complex people who cannot simply be divided into the categories of good or bad, victim or villain.
5 stars.
Yet while “boogie man” may be an easy label to give Roger, it is not perhaps fair to the man, and so historian Ian Mortimer’s The Greatest Traitor sets out to find the man behind the villainous role.
The Greatest Traitor was a sheer joy to read. Mortimer’s writing was engaging and clear, it was so easy to get swept along and want to read another chapter. There are times where I felt that Mortimer was too dramatic, perhaps showing more of a novelist’s flair than a historian’s objective stance, but these were often few enough that it didn’t seriously detract from the experience of reading.
The scholarship, I felt, was top-notch. It was first published in 2003 and shows its age in some ways (for instance, Mortimer now thinks he needs to rewrite this book to firstly deal with Edward II's death and because he no longer believes Roger and Isabella were lovers), but Mortimer’s arguments are logical and easy to follow. I never felt lost or confused about his conclusions. I don’t know if I believe Edward II lived past his traditional date of death (perhaps because “this historical person secretly survived” narratives always seem too good to be true at first and then seem terribly depressing if real), but Mortimer’s arguments are convincing.
Finally, I appreciated Mortimer’s approach. I wasn’t someone who thought a lot about Roger Mortimer but was inclined to think poorly of him. Having read this, I feel that he is a lot more complicated than I initially thought and again, shows that historical figures are complex people who cannot simply be divided into the categories of good or bad, victim or villain.
5 stars.
December 8, 2022
I've read a number of Mortimer's books, probably in reverse order from what was intended and probably enjoyed it the least.
I'm not a historian but it seemed to suffer from the same issue that I've encountered in other books: that there doesn't seem to be enough source material to be able to provide deep insight about the individual in question beyond recounting the historical events in which they participated. Where this book started out differently is in portraying Roger Mortimer as at least somewhat a sympathetic character. For example, while I've often read that Roger Mortimer and Queen Isabella were engaged in an adulterous affair, the author goes to some lengths to explain that this is not necessarily the case based upon an absence of evidence. However, at some point in the book (that I can't exactly pinpoint from memory), this abruptly switched to characterizing him as the avaricious usurper we all know from other histories.
After reading several of the author's books though I think what I found most disconcerting is the sheer amount of time that he spends trying to make the case that Edward II was not actually murdered but instead was released to wander Europe in obscurity. He goes as far to suggest that Edward II's supposed corpse was instead that of another person, only to be eventually switched out when Edward II actually died.
While there is an abundance of argument made to this effect, after reading it several times in several of the author's books, it really has lost its fascination for me and has gotten a little tedious because it doesn't seem to have resonated with other historians. Like so many cases, Mr. Mortimer may be correct and may never be vindicated but nonetheless it seems time to stop shoehorning this argument into every book.
Overall, it is a fine history - I thought it would be a tale of a misunderstood aristocrat but ultimately turned out to be another example of a person totally corrupted by power only to become the Roger Mortimer we knew all along.
I'm not a historian but it seemed to suffer from the same issue that I've encountered in other books: that there doesn't seem to be enough source material to be able to provide deep insight about the individual in question beyond recounting the historical events in which they participated. Where this book started out differently is in portraying Roger Mortimer as at least somewhat a sympathetic character. For example, while I've often read that Roger Mortimer and Queen Isabella were engaged in an adulterous affair, the author goes to some lengths to explain that this is not necessarily the case based upon an absence of evidence. However, at some point in the book (that I can't exactly pinpoint from memory), this abruptly switched to characterizing him as the avaricious usurper we all know from other histories.
After reading several of the author's books though I think what I found most disconcerting is the sheer amount of time that he spends trying to make the case that Edward II was not actually murdered but instead was released to wander Europe in obscurity. He goes as far to suggest that Edward II's supposed corpse was instead that of another person, only to be eventually switched out when Edward II actually died.
While there is an abundance of argument made to this effect, after reading it several times in several of the author's books, it really has lost its fascination for me and has gotten a little tedious because it doesn't seem to have resonated with other historians. Like so many cases, Mr. Mortimer may be correct and may never be vindicated but nonetheless it seems time to stop shoehorning this argument into every book.
Overall, it is a fine history - I thought it would be a tale of a misunderstood aristocrat but ultimately turned out to be another example of a person totally corrupted by power only to become the Roger Mortimer we knew all along.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 102 reviews