This was honestly a great read. This book made me think about how property rights can be assigned. Do we give property to those who have it first? What if the property means more to one person than another? What if the property can be better utilized by someone else? All of these questions get brought up in cases where a court has to decide how to split up property rights.
To make it more interesting, property rights are not all or nothing. Our property rights are often more limited than we think. Property rights are not absolute and can be they can be divided. Think about the property rights shared by a landlord and a tenant. Think about the property rights shared by a landowner, and those who walk on an easement through their property. Think about the property rights of a landowner whose lease has a restrictive covenant. All of these examples show that property rights are often shared, and how to share those rights efficiently or justly isn't always as clear as we first thought.
This class benally named "Property" was much more interesting and impactful than I would have first imagined.