What do you think?
Rate this book


352 pages, Hardcover
Published March 26, 2024
I do not believe that cosmopolitanism and provincialism are antithetical. The forest, which is the most cosmopolitan space I know, one perhaps even more accommodative than the human heart, is also, by virtue of being tied to a place, genetically provincial.There's been a trend of "selection does not imply support" type codicils that various social media entities ranging from random listmaking individuals to popular Bsky accounts have been qualifying their posts with. Yes, the credit card companies are forcing the Internet into Hayes Code 2.0, but I still can't see that this borderline preemptive legal jargon, not too different from what continues to crop up on various fanfictions long after Anne Rice laid waste to her fandom, is helping. Still, the sentiment comes in handy here with this book, which I love in a manner that I know draws as much sympathy as myopicity from its circumspectly conniving roots. Not the best way to start a five star review, but it helps me sleep at night.
If something was stopped abruptly, such as a game of cricket interrupted by rain, they said "intermission"; if someone broke up with their girlfriend, they called it "intermission"; if someone had a heart attack, they called it "intermission," so much so that when I met one of them years later, Bappa asked me whether I'd watched the film Intermission Impossible.As for the book itself, Roy en-calcifies a definition of "provincial" through a myriad of brief exposes and meditative mini-bios, largely drawing from India + Bangladesh of the first half of the 20th c., with the odd Euro (D.H. Lawrence, Shakespeare, Annie Ernaux) and odder US (T.S. Eliot, Faulkner) in order to look at commonalities between the various margins, provinces, "not great to be born there and even worse to try to make a living" writers continue to operate under globalization. I found the subject to be extraordinarily relatable: Roy's prose is exceedingly creative and intensely sympathetic, and since my past self saw fit to randomly read a biography on Rabindranath Tagore and various other relevant nonfictions ranging in topic from Calcutta to Naxalites, I had more than a little grounding to make my way upon.
Microsoft Word underlines these words in red [...] even when they work efficiently in giving us the sense of the stone: "caen-stone," "enfouldered," "rugas," "foveoles," "foraminous cavo-rilievo," "fiducial stones." The study of these stones becomes analogical to a deeper understanding of the difference in "dialect," in language: "I study you glout and gloss, but have / No cadrans to adjust you with."However, I've been honing my sense of habitus (Roy namedrops Bourdieu, if tangentially) since 2013 when first introduced to the concept during a community college course post-university dropout, and I'm well aware how much of my "comfort zone" draws nourishment from zoned off, police cordoned, white supremacied spaces both physical and emotional. Simply put, my appreciation isn't worth much if it makes it harder for me to kill the cop inside my head. So, as soon as Roy left of the rapturous riffling through the treasure trove of names and ideas just off the beaten path and started bemoaning trends in both academia and social networking that has as much to do with the hegemonic onslaught of raising up the digital at the expense of excess (just look at how she discuses figures during the "socialist" and "Left" eras of India and how it contrasts with everything after "the economy opened up"), I hedged my bets and came to terms with my own equivocation.
-quotations from Hugh MacDiarmad (pen name of Christopher Murray Grieve), "On a Raised Beach"
God, in being turned into a provincial, becomes a commoner himself. And hence the dissolution of all binaries—pure and impure, here and there, far and near, touchable and untouchable, powerful and powerless, city and province. And rich and poor—for the rich will make temples for Shiva, but the poor's body is a temple itself: the legs pillars, "the body the shrine," the head "a cupola of gold."You see, part of why I liked this so much was looking at how easily a person like Roy could be radicalized along the lines of the Hindu alt-right we've been seeing for a few years now. Rather, I took the similarities in sympathies she was able to cultivate in me through her confessional style and looked at how this "provincialism" plays out in a public landscape I have a great deal more experience in: the United States, with all its political slogans that use and abuse the "rural," the "Midwest," the "South," the "working class," and have no real interest in making it possible for everyone to make a living where they were born. Roy paints her dis-junction in classroom insults and adult nostalgia, but for a US white male, it's "what they took from us" and other such dogwhistle demagoguery, where it is more than disingenuous and even a little dangerous to sideline discussions about race and class while complaining about the hegemony of postcolonial nationalism and predatory capitalism. Cause let's face it: your best bet at long term stability is to get that one post to go viral enough to reach that one right person, cause pension? Never heard of her. Health insurance? In this economy? A place to rest your weary head? What, are you some kind of commie?
In that word is the intimation of a way of life that has been left behind, that must be left behind, even though it might be precious.And yet, at heart, I did truly enjoy this book (and its typeface), as much as for the nourishment it provided my beleaguered brain as well as the bookish respite from ongoing reality it offered my soul. For Roy's conversational intellectualism is just my style, and I hadn't realized how much I had been missing plain old author discussion until she gave it to me in many a variegated form. All in all, it gives me that much more strength to continue to check books such as this, barely a blip on any of the 'important' radars, from the local public library. I just hope that the reception to her writing doesn't encourage her to go down the 'culture is dead' route that she so briefly, yet so tellingly, went down three-quarters through.
...a culture that does not read closely will naturally be dependent on what comes to it in paraphrase.P.S. Part of my critique is also due to a couple of uncensored slurs, the n-word and h*jra, that even more reinforces my suspicions as to who makes up Roy's ideal audience.