Early in Grant Lichtman’s #EdJourney: A Roadmap to the Future of Education, the author offers a question that implies the motivation the fueled the book. The question below resonated with me, as it is a question I have long pondered, even as far back as my own middle days. “What if we were starting a school from scratch, with no preconditions other than creating the best possible learning environment for students?” (Lichtman, 2014, p. 10). Sufficed to say, there are very, very few people would answer “We wouldn’t change anything; our current school system is perfect.” If that were the case, obviously we wouldn’t need a book such as Lichtman’s, where he essentially took a roadtrip across the country, visiting school after school, and collecting ideas for invigorating innovations for our educational system.
When our current Common Core Standards were first introduced, they were delivered with the premise that schools were failing to adequately prepare students for the real world, for business and industry, for a changing world that required more communication, critical thinking, collaboration, and creativity. During Lichtman’s research process, he asked various groups of high school seniors to list the qualities that, in theory, should be found within a successful graduate ready to enter the real world. Naturally, the list of most common and most powerful terms are attributes that cannot directly be tested on a standardized test.
“[Students most commonly listed:] Persistence; confidence; resilience; patience; openness; creativity; adaptability; courage; perspective; empathy; and self-control.” (Lichtman, 2014, p. 104-105).
As I read that list, I initially felt a bit of educator guilt. Let me first explain by describing what I teach at my central California high school: college prep English for sophomores, English Language Development, multimedia production, and creative writing. Let me further explain that the guilt I felt that, when I considered the student-created list of attributes, I do not believe my first two classes (English 2 and ELD) really produce. However, I felt better when I realized that those two classes are traditional, both in terms of curriculum and delivery (in fact, they are essentially scripted formats that I must deliver). However, in my multimedia and creative writing classes, I can find each and every one of those attributes embedded.
This left me beaming, especially when considering a later quote from Lichtman based on his research. “Of the many skills we recognize as critical to the future success of students in an increasingly competitive world, creativity is the one that is most difficult to outsource, to send offshore, to replace by less expensive competition that threatens to overwhelm us.” (Lichtman, 2014, p. 148). At my school, both the multimedia and creative writing courses are relatively new (both less than five years old). As a result, they were developed and designed with input from modern-day innovations and fact-based research in education. They intentionally do not adhere to traditional models.
Lichtman’s book found, in a plethora of anecdotes and testimonials, current education is succeeding most when distancing from the assembly-line approach first implemented generations ago. It is no surprise that Lichtman found that creativity and ingenuity in educational reform is usually followed by -- brace for it -- students actually enjoying their own educational journies and feeling prepared for what lies beyond. “Everything we know about the history of successful innovation screams that we must move from theory to action: imagining, designing, testing, piloting, failing, tweaking.” (Lichtman, 2014, p. 232). In short, everything from daily schedules to the definition of “classroom” is being reconsidered at public and private schools across the country. Those who develop new formats and school cultures are finding real-world success for their students by breaking from both the conventional and the traditional.