For starters, I am a HUGE fan of classic detective series. My best-of list would include the master, Sherlock Holmes; the feisty Belgian, Poriot; the holy brother, Cadfael; the godfather, Auguste Dupin; and last but certainly not least, my first love, Nancy Drew.
The reason I bring that up is because in "The Honjin Murders," the quirky detective uses his knowledge of old classic detective novels to solve the crime. That’s right! And believe me, I was all eyes—you know, the all-ears equivalent. Just run with me here.
So, we have a 1930s setting, a locked-room murder, many suspects (including a masked person with three fingers), and a fun detective on the case. What could go wrong?
Well, I’ll tell you, but before I do, I might bring up a few analogies that might give a very slight inclination toward the killer's mindset. So, if you want to go in completely blind, skip the rest.
Okay, I lied. If you are still reading the review, you must post some of your favorite detectives at the bottom so I can look them up and discover some other fun series.
Really now, let’s continue.
Where were we? Oh, that’s right. What could go wrong? Well, as much as it pains me to say it, the reveal was just so implausible. I really, really wanted to like this story, but I think Leonardo da Vinci would have a hard time developing and executing this ruse, especially over the course of two days. I was thinking, maybe there will be a reveal within the reveal or a twist that would make me gasp or perhaps the victim was actually someone else. Nope, it just kind of fizzles out.
Now if you’ve read this book and are thinking, no way, Chris, it was innovative how this connected to that and this was pulled here, and that taut line held the so and so in place, etc., and to that, I would say, "Sorry, I’m just not buying it. It’s too elaborate to pull off, the theatrics are too grand, the variables are too great, it would have been too easy to just follow the blood." Just sayin’ 😉
There were a few other things I should mention. One: the red herrings are plentiful in this one. Sadly, some of the mysteries you fill in your head are probably a bit more exciting than the actual outcome. Two, the marriage conclusion was extremely icky. Three, I would recommend you look up some of the architectural elements that are mentioned as a visual so that the reveal makes a bit more sense, unless, of course, you are Rube Goldberg, Doc Brown, or Frank Lloyd Wright.
I guess this has turned into what the kids like to call "a rant review", but I’m not entirely sure I actually reviewed anything. Okay, so this is just rambling on at this point, so I’ll just leave it with this. It was fine. That’s it; it was fine.
I lied again. One more thing. I already know someone is going to read this review and post the following quote in response to the problems I had with the convoluted murder plot. "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth", because it is something I would do. And to that, I would say, "bravo", but I’m still not changing my rating. 😁
❖ Category: mystery
❖ Rating: 2.5/5