What do you think?
Rate this book
Blue Jerusalem: British Conservatism, Winston Churchill, and the Second World War
The untold story of how Winston Churchill and the Conservative Party envisioned Britain's post-war future
We think we know all there is to know about Britain's Second World War. We don't.
This radical re-interpretation of British history and British Conservatism between 1939 and 1945 reveals the bold, at times utopian, plans British Conservatives drew up for Britain and the post-war world.
From proposals for world government to a more united Empire via dreams of a new Christian elite and a move back-to-the-land, Blue Jerusalem reveals how Conservatives were every bit as imaginative and courageous as their Labour and left-wing opponents in their wartime plans for a post-war world.
Bringing these alternative visions of Britain's post-war future back to life, Blue Jerusalem restores politics to the centre of the story of Britain's war. It demonstrates how everything from the weapons Britain fought with, to the theatres in which the fighting took place and the allies Britain chose were the product of political decisions about the different futures Conservatives wanted to make.
Rejecting notions of a 'people's war' that continue to cloud how we think of World War II, it explores how the Tories used their control of the home and battle front to fight a deeply Conservative war and build the martial, imperial, and Christian nation many that many of a Conservative disposition had long dreamed of.
A study of political thinking as well as political manoeuvre, Blue Jerusalem goes beyond an examination of the usual suspects - such as Winston Churchill and Neville Chamberlain - to reveal a hitherto lost world of British Conservativism and a set of forgotten futures that continue to shape our world.
We think we know all there is to know about Britain's Second World War. We don't.
This radical re-interpretation of British history and British Conservatism between 1939 and 1945 reveals the bold, at times utopian, plans British Conservatives drew up for Britain and the post-war world.
From proposals for world government to a more united Empire via dreams of a new Christian elite and a move back-to-the-land, Blue Jerusalem reveals how Conservatives were every bit as imaginative and courageous as their Labour and left-wing opponents in their wartime plans for a post-war world.
Bringing these alternative visions of Britain's post-war future back to life, Blue Jerusalem restores politics to the centre of the story of Britain's war. It demonstrates how everything from the weapons Britain fought with, to the theatres in which the fighting took place and the allies Britain chose were the product of political decisions about the different futures Conservatives wanted to make.
Rejecting notions of a 'people's war' that continue to cloud how we think of World War II, it explores how the Tories used their control of the home and battle front to fight a deeply Conservative war and build the martial, imperial, and Christian nation many that many of a Conservative disposition had long dreamed of.
A study of political thinking as well as political manoeuvre, Blue Jerusalem goes beyond an examination of the usual suspects - such as Winston Churchill and Neville Chamberlain - to reveal a hitherto lost world of British Conservativism and a set of forgotten futures that continue to shape our world.
352 pages, Hardcover
First published December 12, 2024
8 people are currently reading
90 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
January 17, 2025
I could never run in my whole life, my wife and kids were always disappointed with how slow i was. When i played this audiobook i ran to get up and throw the speaker in the water my family loves me now.
Read
November 29, 2024Blue Jerusalem: British Conservatism, Winston Churchill, and the Second World War by Kit Kowol (Oxford) is a remarkable history of the Conservative Party during the Second World War that explores the lengths wartime Conservatives were willing to go to in order to imagine a Tory future for the postwar nation. Kowol shows that radical and utopian visions of postwar construction were not just the preserve of the Left, and that in spite of their crushing defeat in the 1945 election Conservatives could be just as visionary and creative.
Read History Today’s Books of the Year 2024 at https://www.historytoday.com/archive/...
Francis Young is author of Twilight of the Godlings: The Shadowy Beginnings of Britain’s Supernatural Beings (Cambridge University Press)
Read History Today’s Books of the Year 2024 at https://www.historytoday.com/archive/...
Francis Young is author of Twilight of the Godlings: The Shadowy Beginnings of Britain’s Supernatural Beings (Cambridge University Press)
May 22, 2025
Latter half very useful for reconsidering the narrativization of the 'people's war' and complicating what is taken to be the reconstruction 'focus'/'consensus' on welfare in the coalition government. Like David Edgerton, there is an argument for seeing the period's politics as focused on (usually economically determined) social organisation and planning, as opposed to the actively pursued provision of welfare. Also reiterates how Beveridge's reforms were relatively minor in the grand scheme of things - to the point that the Tory's adherence to them post-1945 (election pending) was unproblematic and even cohesive with their agenda (focus on family, responsible individuals, combating 'laziness'.) It was one of the few things this actually very sectional party could agree on. Whilst Labour won the election, the continuity in the social order was remarkably C/conservative, despite not in the way anticipated or hoped for by all the splinter factions/interests the book covers. For all the beef the argument takes with accounts like Addison's and Calder's, the general implication of a (retrospectively) largely unaltered social order is shared between them. I guess Kowol is getting at the fact it shouldn't have been a retrospective admission of shock/realisation etc.
'As is often the case in British politics— and which in 1944–45 applied to Labour as much as the Conservatives— what kept parties together was their opposition to one another, not policy. The question of nationalisation, and what kind of nation Britain was, became the key divide during the 1945 general election, not welfare.'
'As is often the case in British politics— and which in 1944–45 applied to Labour as much as the Conservatives— what kept parties together was their opposition to one another, not policy. The question of nationalisation, and what kind of nation Britain was, became the key divide during the 1945 general election, not welfare.'
January 17, 2025
MY dad disowned me not for being gay cause he heard me reading this book.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews