What do you think?
Rate this book
The Conscience of the Party: Hu Yaobang, China’s Communist Reformer
The definitive story of a top Chinese politician’s ill-fated quest to reform the Communist Party.When Hu Yaobang died in April 1989, throngs of mourners converged on the Martyrs’ Monument in Tiananmen Square to pay their respects. Following Hu’s 1987 ouster by party elders, Chinese propaganda officials had sought to tarnish his reputation and dim his memory, yet his death galvanized the nascent pro-democracy student movement, setting off the dramatic demonstrations that culminated in the Tiananmen massacre.The Conscience of the Party is the comprehensive, authoritative biography of the Chinese Communist Party’s most avid reformer and its general secretary for a key stretch of the 1980s. A supremely intelligent leader with an exceptional populist touch, Hu Yaobang was tapped early by Mao Zedong as a capable party hand. But Hu’s principled ideas made him powerful enemies, and during the Cultural Revolution he was purged, brutally beaten, and consigned to forced labor. After Mao’s death, Hu rose again as an ally of Deng Xiaoping, eventually securing the party’s top position. In that role, he pioneered many of the economic reforms subsequently attributed to Deng. But Hu also pursued political reforms with equal vigor, pushing for more freedom of expression, the end of lifetime tenure for CCP leaders, and the dismantling of Mao’s personality cult. Alarmed by Hu’s growing popularity and increasingly radical agenda, Deng had him purged again in 1987.Historian and former intelligence analyst Robert L. Suettinger meticulously reconstructs Hu’s life, providing the kind of eye-opening account that remains impossible in China under state censorship. Hu Yaobang, a decent man operating in a system that did not always reward decency, suffered for his principles but inspired millions in the process.
488 pages, Hardcover
Published October 15, 2024
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews
May 28, 2025
ideal honeymoon read.
July 6, 2025
One of the most tragic figures in CCP history 😞 spoilers he does not get what he deserved 💔 !!!
July 6, 2024
The Conscience of the Party is the definitive biography of Hu Yaobang, the Chinese Communist Party’s most passionate reformer and its General Secretary during the monumental shifts of the 1980s. China analyst Robert L. Suettinger skilfully integrates Hu Yaobang’s life story into the broader narrative of modern Chinese history, offering readers a comprehensive understanding of the nation’s political system, economic development and culture. In the introduction, the author argues that “understanding a country’s internal politics is a prerequisite for understanding its foreign policies, goals, ambitions, and strategy.” I believe this book is a much-needed contribution to an understudied area of modern Chinese history, specifically the changes in the aftermath of Mao’s death. Hu Yaobang was known for his sophisticated mind, brilliant organisational skills, and courageous efforts to reform the Chinese government. He was remembered for his tolerance, integrity, and concern for ordinary people—qualities that unfortunately seem lacking in his successors.
Hu did not initially strike one as a natural leader. Born in 1915 in Hunan Province, he began his life in the modest and challenging conditions of a peasant family. He was of short stature and of slight build. Noticed at a young age to be intellectually curious and interested in reading, his entire family pooled their resources together to send him to school. As a boy, he walked back and forth between his home and school, totalling about twelve and a half miles. He left school at age fourteen but never abandoned his appreciation for education and the educated. Hu Yaobang read avidly anytime and always had a book at hand. We can see now how Hu Yaobang’s birthplace, cultural heritage, and upbringing put him in the path of China’s political revolution.
His wiry strength would pay off after he joined the Chinese Communist Party and was one of the youngest veterans of the Long March. When he arrived at Yan’an, he had been a thin, sickly “little red devil” who had barely survived the march. As a youth activist, he showed a talent for propaganda and organisation. An enthusiastic and bright student of Mao Zedong, he utilised his writing skills in the cause of the revolution. Hu further developed these skills during his long tenure in the Youth League, where he actively developed its daily and weekly publications. His literacy and love of poetry enabled him to create a unique training manual for poorly educated soldiers in the form of the People’s Army Three-Character Classic, a comprehensive and memorable guide in three-character phrases explaining various Communist Party principles. He also had the rare habit of preparing his own speeches throughout his career.
Hu, disillusioned by Maoism, endured brutal physical and emotional torment during the Cultural Revolution. Remarkably, he never “broke, begged, betrayed, or confessed.” Despite marrying and starting a family, he was powerless to shield his young wife from the psychological oppression inflicted by the political party they both served, which frequently led to their separation from their children. After a complete physical collapse, influential friends intervened, rescuing him. He emerged from this ordeal as a seasoned party bureaucrat, resilient and unbroken.
Hu’s lifelong opposition to forced confessions and guilt by denunciation is highlighted through his advocacy of the “four nos”: no attacking personal shortcomings, no political labelling, no violence, and no bringing up unverifiable evidence. His relationship with Deng Xiaoping is contrasted with those of other party leaders, illustrating the complex dynamics within the party. One major theme of this book is clarifying that Deng and Hu “… had worked together over many years, always in a superior-subordinate, although not patron-protégé, relationship.” Hu was later persecuted for his economic ideas by those from much wealthier backgrounds, despite – or perhaps due to – his popularity and understanding with the common people.
Hu, renowned for his reformist zeal, was a pivotal advocate for economic and political reforms in the 1980s, championing greater openness and tolerance. With intimate knowledge of farming and the worldview of the working classes, Hu frequently clashed with critics who, from the comfort of their luxury villas, opposed his efforts to decollectivize the countryside and dismantle the “much hated and inefficient” commune system. Similarly, his relatively pragmatic and sensitive policies relating to Tibet were unfortunately very short lived. He worked relentlessly to rehabilitate many individuals who had suffered during the Cultural Revolution, a topic that may interest those in post-conflict studies. I was previously unaware of how the aftermath of the Cultural Revolution was documented, analysed, and processed in the subsequent decades, and found these chapters to be exceptionally enlightening.
One of the best aspects of this book is that it provides a way to examine this era with greater detail and purpose, including many new interpretations based on more recently available materials. Most of the evidence used in this book is from Chinese-language articles, personal memoirs of officials, family members and journalists, and more recently published documents. The book is honest about gaps in knowledge, acknowledging the difficulty of reconstructing events accurately when they touch upon sensitive topics or time periods.
His removal from office in 1987 was related to his perceived leniency towards student protests and his moves to encourage the numerous elderly leaders to retire. These seniors wanted to “enjoy a few more years of comfort and secure appropriate comforts for their families after they stepped down.” Hu put much effort into rehabilitating these old party members, sometimes putting himself at odds with those who clung to Maoism, and eventually these men would turn on him. Despite his humiliating and devastating dismissal, he had to visit his superiors, including Deng Xiaoping, at their homes during the Spring Festival, adding insult to injury.
There were many periods of his life covered in this book where it is impossible to know how he felt, either due to a lack of sources or how he must have hidden his feelings for his own self-preservation. The reader does feel his suffering when he set himself the task of re-reading the complete works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles, to determine whether “his own words and actions were consistent with the canonical works of his faith.” His death and the public outpouring of grief is tied to the Tiananmen Square protests, and therefore he subsequently became a “non-person.” At his funeral and other later commemorations of his death, the party refused to do him the honour of acknowledging him as a “great Marxist.” It is poignant to consider how Hu Yaobang, emerging from humble beginnings through his love of books, sought comfort and solace in reading during his final years. His spirit remerges, however, with how his legacy was reignited by publishers from Hong Kong and collections of his works appearing on the internet. The Hu Yaobang Historical Materials Information Web (胡耀邦史料信息网) is highlighted as an example of how websites can serve as living memorials, garnering more attention than originally expected. Those wishing to understand how Hu Yaobang’s influence and the influence of his detractors shape Chinese policy today will find this book insightful.
Hu’s life and career are presented as the story of an extremely capable and decent man operating in a system that did not always reward decency and innovation. As Suettinger observes, “Hu was a classic tragic hero, whose efforts to do the right thing brought about his own downfall.” Hu failed as a political reformer, and his successors have not learned, or been empowered, to do much better. In many ways, they are doing worse, and the book prompts us to ask why. The author sometimes provides extensive backstory about other figures to explain rivalries and intrigues, which could have been better signposted to connect back to Hu Yaobang. Naturally, readers should brace themselves for summaries of every type of possible CCP discussion, from self-criticism sessions, standard meetings, conferences, workgroups to plenums.
The Conscience of the Party ends on a sombre note. Many of the issues and abuses that Hu Yaobang sought to address—such as the cult of personality, lifetime tenure, ideological rigidity, and the absence of political accountability—have resurfaced with renewed intensity. This book is a must-read for those seeking a deep dive into China’s domestic policies and political reform efforts. It illuminates the sweeping transformations in Chinese society over the past century, spanning cultural, social, and economic shifts. Through the lens of Hu Yaobang’s life, the book unravels the intricate challenges of political reform and the delicate dance around power and relationship hierarchies. While China’s economic productivity has been remarkable, lifting it to a world-leading position in many areas, Hu Yaobang’s aspiration to let ordinary people prosper first has not been fully realised.
This book was provided by Harvard University Press for review.
Hu did not initially strike one as a natural leader. Born in 1915 in Hunan Province, he began his life in the modest and challenging conditions of a peasant family. He was of short stature and of slight build. Noticed at a young age to be intellectually curious and interested in reading, his entire family pooled their resources together to send him to school. As a boy, he walked back and forth between his home and school, totalling about twelve and a half miles. He left school at age fourteen but never abandoned his appreciation for education and the educated. Hu Yaobang read avidly anytime and always had a book at hand. We can see now how Hu Yaobang’s birthplace, cultural heritage, and upbringing put him in the path of China’s political revolution.
His wiry strength would pay off after he joined the Chinese Communist Party and was one of the youngest veterans of the Long March. When he arrived at Yan’an, he had been a thin, sickly “little red devil” who had barely survived the march. As a youth activist, he showed a talent for propaganda and organisation. An enthusiastic and bright student of Mao Zedong, he utilised his writing skills in the cause of the revolution. Hu further developed these skills during his long tenure in the Youth League, where he actively developed its daily and weekly publications. His literacy and love of poetry enabled him to create a unique training manual for poorly educated soldiers in the form of the People’s Army Three-Character Classic, a comprehensive and memorable guide in three-character phrases explaining various Communist Party principles. He also had the rare habit of preparing his own speeches throughout his career.
Hu, disillusioned by Maoism, endured brutal physical and emotional torment during the Cultural Revolution. Remarkably, he never “broke, begged, betrayed, or confessed.” Despite marrying and starting a family, he was powerless to shield his young wife from the psychological oppression inflicted by the political party they both served, which frequently led to their separation from their children. After a complete physical collapse, influential friends intervened, rescuing him. He emerged from this ordeal as a seasoned party bureaucrat, resilient and unbroken.
Hu’s lifelong opposition to forced confessions and guilt by denunciation is highlighted through his advocacy of the “four nos”: no attacking personal shortcomings, no political labelling, no violence, and no bringing up unverifiable evidence. His relationship with Deng Xiaoping is contrasted with those of other party leaders, illustrating the complex dynamics within the party. One major theme of this book is clarifying that Deng and Hu “… had worked together over many years, always in a superior-subordinate, although not patron-protégé, relationship.” Hu was later persecuted for his economic ideas by those from much wealthier backgrounds, despite – or perhaps due to – his popularity and understanding with the common people.
Hu, renowned for his reformist zeal, was a pivotal advocate for economic and political reforms in the 1980s, championing greater openness and tolerance. With intimate knowledge of farming and the worldview of the working classes, Hu frequently clashed with critics who, from the comfort of their luxury villas, opposed his efforts to decollectivize the countryside and dismantle the “much hated and inefficient” commune system. Similarly, his relatively pragmatic and sensitive policies relating to Tibet were unfortunately very short lived. He worked relentlessly to rehabilitate many individuals who had suffered during the Cultural Revolution, a topic that may interest those in post-conflict studies. I was previously unaware of how the aftermath of the Cultural Revolution was documented, analysed, and processed in the subsequent decades, and found these chapters to be exceptionally enlightening.
One of the best aspects of this book is that it provides a way to examine this era with greater detail and purpose, including many new interpretations based on more recently available materials. Most of the evidence used in this book is from Chinese-language articles, personal memoirs of officials, family members and journalists, and more recently published documents. The book is honest about gaps in knowledge, acknowledging the difficulty of reconstructing events accurately when they touch upon sensitive topics or time periods.
His removal from office in 1987 was related to his perceived leniency towards student protests and his moves to encourage the numerous elderly leaders to retire. These seniors wanted to “enjoy a few more years of comfort and secure appropriate comforts for their families after they stepped down.” Hu put much effort into rehabilitating these old party members, sometimes putting himself at odds with those who clung to Maoism, and eventually these men would turn on him. Despite his humiliating and devastating dismissal, he had to visit his superiors, including Deng Xiaoping, at their homes during the Spring Festival, adding insult to injury.
There were many periods of his life covered in this book where it is impossible to know how he felt, either due to a lack of sources or how he must have hidden his feelings for his own self-preservation. The reader does feel his suffering when he set himself the task of re-reading the complete works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles, to determine whether “his own words and actions were consistent with the canonical works of his faith.” His death and the public outpouring of grief is tied to the Tiananmen Square protests, and therefore he subsequently became a “non-person.” At his funeral and other later commemorations of his death, the party refused to do him the honour of acknowledging him as a “great Marxist.” It is poignant to consider how Hu Yaobang, emerging from humble beginnings through his love of books, sought comfort and solace in reading during his final years. His spirit remerges, however, with how his legacy was reignited by publishers from Hong Kong and collections of his works appearing on the internet. The Hu Yaobang Historical Materials Information Web (胡耀邦史料信息网) is highlighted as an example of how websites can serve as living memorials, garnering more attention than originally expected. Those wishing to understand how Hu Yaobang’s influence and the influence of his detractors shape Chinese policy today will find this book insightful.
Hu’s life and career are presented as the story of an extremely capable and decent man operating in a system that did not always reward decency and innovation. As Suettinger observes, “Hu was a classic tragic hero, whose efforts to do the right thing brought about his own downfall.” Hu failed as a political reformer, and his successors have not learned, or been empowered, to do much better. In many ways, they are doing worse, and the book prompts us to ask why. The author sometimes provides extensive backstory about other figures to explain rivalries and intrigues, which could have been better signposted to connect back to Hu Yaobang. Naturally, readers should brace themselves for summaries of every type of possible CCP discussion, from self-criticism sessions, standard meetings, conferences, workgroups to plenums.
The Conscience of the Party ends on a sombre note. Many of the issues and abuses that Hu Yaobang sought to address—such as the cult of personality, lifetime tenure, ideological rigidity, and the absence of political accountability—have resurfaced with renewed intensity. This book is a must-read for those seeking a deep dive into China’s domestic policies and political reform efforts. It illuminates the sweeping transformations in Chinese society over the past century, spanning cultural, social, and economic shifts. Through the lens of Hu Yaobang’s life, the book unravels the intricate challenges of political reform and the delicate dance around power and relationship hierarchies. While China’s economic productivity has been remarkable, lifting it to a world-leading position in many areas, Hu Yaobang’s aspiration to let ordinary people prosper first has not been fully realised.
This book was provided by Harvard University Press for review.
August 4, 2025
At nearly 400 pages, this tome would benefit from some editing. Nevertheless, I think it is a success, as it manages to summarise an otherwise almost inscrutably complicated history into something understandable—if not entirely straightforward.
The title of the book is a phrase coined by Tian Jiyun, former Vice Premier of China, and readers can decide for themselves whether it is poignantly apt or not. It is surely not meant to be ironic.
Hu played a pivotal role in raising the possibility of properly evaluating the Cultural Revolution and learning from the catastrophes it caused. He almost single-handedly cleared most of the names of those who were unjustly persecuted during the Cultural Revolution. His other important achievement was the implementation of agricultural reforms that rectified earlier mistakes and disasters. Without these, the subsequent so-called economic miracles would definitely not have happened.
As mentioned, the book is a bit too long, and the number of people referenced is vast. If you're not already somewhat familiar with this period in Chinese history, you may find yourself quickly overwhelmed by the names.
In any case, it is overall a highly readable and informative work. Five stars.
The title of the book is a phrase coined by Tian Jiyun, former Vice Premier of China, and readers can decide for themselves whether it is poignantly apt or not. It is surely not meant to be ironic.
Hu played a pivotal role in raising the possibility of properly evaluating the Cultural Revolution and learning from the catastrophes it caused. He almost single-handedly cleared most of the names of those who were unjustly persecuted during the Cultural Revolution. His other important achievement was the implementation of agricultural reforms that rectified earlier mistakes and disasters. Without these, the subsequent so-called economic miracles would definitely not have happened.
As mentioned, the book is a bit too long, and the number of people referenced is vast. If you're not already somewhat familiar with this period in Chinese history, you may find yourself quickly overwhelmed by the names.
In any case, it is overall a highly readable and informative work. Five stars.
March 11, 2025
This is an acceptable, if not mediocre, account of Hu Yaobang's life. Two jarring problems stand out:
(1) The book got Hu Yaobang's Chinese name wrong on the very first page of Chapter 1. Yes, every book makes mistakes and typos, but this is an embarrassment of epic proportions.
(2) The first half of the book is less of a biography of Hu's early life than a brief account of the history of China under Mao. There are so many other good works on the general political history of Maoist China that we don't really need this.
(1) The book got Hu Yaobang's Chinese name wrong on the very first page of Chapter 1. Yes, every book makes mistakes and typos, but this is an embarrassment of epic proportions.
(2) The first half of the book is less of a biography of Hu's early life than a brief account of the history of China under Mao. There are so many other good works on the general political history of Maoist China that we don't really need this.
November 11, 2025
“Hu’s life and career unfold in the pages to follow not as a hagiography or an example of unrealistic virtue, but as the story of a capable and decent man operating in a system that did not always reward decency and innovation. In the end, it is a tragic story of one man’s brave effort to bring about social, economic, and political improvement for the many, but losing out to the greed, envy, and hunger for power of the few. He was not a hero; he often knuckled under to men he believed wiser or more powerful than himself. But he had the strength, dignity, and integrity that inspired many of his subordinates and still resonates today with people who believe the Communist Party can reform itself.”
“Ultimately, he oversaw the reversal of more than half a million wrongful party judgements, affecting more than four million cadres and their families.”
4 stars.
All things considered, this is an excellent biography of CCP General Secretary Hu Yaobang - the reformer whose ignominious ousting and unexpected death shortly thereafter precipitated the 1989 Tiananmen protests which were violently dispersed one morning in June.
I say “all things considered” because this was written entirely from secondary sources and materials (previously) available online. On account of being a former CIA intelligence analyst, the author (prudently) declined to do any in-person interviews in the PRC for fear of the hassles doing so might bring for his interlocutors.
On the one hand, then, what Suettinger has put together here is all the more remarkable. It really is incredible what ten years of reading and internet sleuthing can result in if you know where to look. This is a highly insightful and well-written biography, and it brings a number of sources and points of interest to an English-speaking audience for the first time. On the other hand, there is by definition nothing “new” here, and certain aspects of Hu’s life remain completely unmentioned (such as for example the existence of some of his children) probably largely as a result of the author’s particular vector of access to his subject.
Still though, Suettinger does at times make lemonade out of the lemons he was faced with: he’s unusually outspoken about gaps and disagreements in the literature (probably an occupational hazard of being an intelligence analyst), I actually found this aspect of his writing quite interesting and insightful at times, it really gives an interesting sense of both what the CCP finds sensitive, and how certain people try to launder their reputations in their own memoirs.
To turn to the analysis, for me, I think probably one of the most interesting major points here which I hadn’t considered/didn’t know was regarding Hu’s patrons. I had always lazily assumed Hu was Deng Xiaoping’s man, and that presumably he’d been plucked out of semi-obscurity due to his liberal inclinations and competence. I had no idea that Hu was very much one of Mao’s picks (who supercharged his career early on and intervened at key moments), and that it was PLA Marshall-cum-PRC President Ye Jianying who was Hu’s primary patron. This second-hand quote of Hu’s - as told by former Vice Premier Tian Jiyun - is revealing:
“Some people divide us into factions, saying Hu Yaobang is a disciple of Deng Xiaoping. That is complete nonsense. I joined the revolution in 1930 but didn't meet Deng Xiaoping until 1944.”
Interestingly, the story that emerges in Suettinger’s telling is one in which it was Hu’s acceptability to Hua Guofeng and Ye Jianying which resulted in his initial elevation after Mao’s death. And it was Ye’s death in 1986 which paved the way for the “palace coup” which ousted Hu from the General Secretary role.
One of the really interesting points which emerges here is regarding Deng’s vision for reform. His lukewarm, often ambivalent, sometimes downright hostile, reactions to Hu’s reform work really makes one wonder if the image in the West of Deng as the patron saint of reform is perhaps in need of some nuance. Ironic to recall it was Deng’s charges of Hu succumbing to “bourgeois liberalization” that ultimately serve as the fodder which would be used to bring him down.
Regarding the narrative itself: it was interesting to learn about Hu’s early career. I found his time suppressing the “bandit chaos” in North Sichuan particularly noteworthy.
One thing that did fall a bit flat for me though, was the man himself. I get that he was affable, diligent, and competent - more than a few anecdotes mention his sense of humour and how he frequently made people laugh, which is not hard to imagine an excitable 4 foot 11 basketball player from the Deep South doing - but I found the almost total omission of his personal life to be a bit disappointing. Partially the result of a lack of access I’m sure, but I think this just reflects the authors preoccupation with high-level politics.
Another point that left me a bit perplexed was the relationship between Deng and Hu. Suettinger does a great job of showing that it was complicated - that’s for sure - but ultimately it wasn’t entirely clear to me what was the defining factor in leading Deng to turn against him. I think a lengthier and more explicit treatment of this fairly crucial point would have been good.
Still though, a great read which I learned a lot from, it nicely rounds out Ezra Vogel’s biography on Deng Xiaoping and nuances Zhao Ziyang’s memoirs in some interesting ways.
“Ultimately, he oversaw the reversal of more than half a million wrongful party judgements, affecting more than four million cadres and their families.”
4 stars.
All things considered, this is an excellent biography of CCP General Secretary Hu Yaobang - the reformer whose ignominious ousting and unexpected death shortly thereafter precipitated the 1989 Tiananmen protests which were violently dispersed one morning in June.
I say “all things considered” because this was written entirely from secondary sources and materials (previously) available online. On account of being a former CIA intelligence analyst, the author (prudently) declined to do any in-person interviews in the PRC for fear of the hassles doing so might bring for his interlocutors.
On the one hand, then, what Suettinger has put together here is all the more remarkable. It really is incredible what ten years of reading and internet sleuthing can result in if you know where to look. This is a highly insightful and well-written biography, and it brings a number of sources and points of interest to an English-speaking audience for the first time. On the other hand, there is by definition nothing “new” here, and certain aspects of Hu’s life remain completely unmentioned (such as for example the existence of some of his children) probably largely as a result of the author’s particular vector of access to his subject.
Still though, Suettinger does at times make lemonade out of the lemons he was faced with: he’s unusually outspoken about gaps and disagreements in the literature (probably an occupational hazard of being an intelligence analyst), I actually found this aspect of his writing quite interesting and insightful at times, it really gives an interesting sense of both what the CCP finds sensitive, and how certain people try to launder their reputations in their own memoirs.
To turn to the analysis, for me, I think probably one of the most interesting major points here which I hadn’t considered/didn’t know was regarding Hu’s patrons. I had always lazily assumed Hu was Deng Xiaoping’s man, and that presumably he’d been plucked out of semi-obscurity due to his liberal inclinations and competence. I had no idea that Hu was very much one of Mao’s picks (who supercharged his career early on and intervened at key moments), and that it was PLA Marshall-cum-PRC President Ye Jianying who was Hu’s primary patron. This second-hand quote of Hu’s - as told by former Vice Premier Tian Jiyun - is revealing:
“Some people divide us into factions, saying Hu Yaobang is a disciple of Deng Xiaoping. That is complete nonsense. I joined the revolution in 1930 but didn't meet Deng Xiaoping until 1944.”
Interestingly, the story that emerges in Suettinger’s telling is one in which it was Hu’s acceptability to Hua Guofeng and Ye Jianying which resulted in his initial elevation after Mao’s death. And it was Ye’s death in 1986 which paved the way for the “palace coup” which ousted Hu from the General Secretary role.
One of the really interesting points which emerges here is regarding Deng’s vision for reform. His lukewarm, often ambivalent, sometimes downright hostile, reactions to Hu’s reform work really makes one wonder if the image in the West of Deng as the patron saint of reform is perhaps in need of some nuance. Ironic to recall it was Deng’s charges of Hu succumbing to “bourgeois liberalization” that ultimately serve as the fodder which would be used to bring him down.
Regarding the narrative itself: it was interesting to learn about Hu’s early career. I found his time suppressing the “bandit chaos” in North Sichuan particularly noteworthy.
One thing that did fall a bit flat for me though, was the man himself. I get that he was affable, diligent, and competent - more than a few anecdotes mention his sense of humour and how he frequently made people laugh, which is not hard to imagine an excitable 4 foot 11 basketball player from the Deep South doing - but I found the almost total omission of his personal life to be a bit disappointing. Partially the result of a lack of access I’m sure, but I think this just reflects the authors preoccupation with high-level politics.
Another point that left me a bit perplexed was the relationship between Deng and Hu. Suettinger does a great job of showing that it was complicated - that’s for sure - but ultimately it wasn’t entirely clear to me what was the defining factor in leading Deng to turn against him. I think a lengthier and more explicit treatment of this fairly crucial point would have been good.
Still though, a great read which I learned a lot from, it nicely rounds out Ezra Vogel’s biography on Deng Xiaoping and nuances Zhao Ziyang’s memoirs in some interesting ways.
November 5, 2024
Hu Yaobang was a great man, survived the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in general squallor, gradually returning to the good graces of the Chinese Communist Party following the death of Mao Zedong, was named General Secretary of the CCP in 1981, yet again became entangled in intraparty rivalries, was tossed aside as too liberal in 1987, and literally did not come out of all his travails alive. The title of this book, "The Conscience of the Party" speaks volumes for his place in the party pantheon and for the reverence with which many Chinese remember Hu.
East West Notes has written and posted an excellent appreciation of Robert Suettinger's important biography, which you should read in an adjacent review...and if you were not born in the People's Republic of China and were instead born in the USA or Canada, you will very likely thank your lucky stars by the conclusion of this needed, sometimes harrowing story of a good man who wanted something better, freer, more honest for the Chinese people but was cruelly thwarted by Mao's elderly successors, who wanted very little to do with political and economic reforms, seeing them as dangerous to the continued dominance of the Chinese Communist Party.
East West Notes has written and posted an excellent appreciation of Robert Suettinger's important biography, which you should read in an adjacent review...and if you were not born in the People's Republic of China and were instead born in the USA or Canada, you will very likely thank your lucky stars by the conclusion of this needed, sometimes harrowing story of a good man who wanted something better, freer, more honest for the Chinese people but was cruelly thwarted by Mao's elderly successors, who wanted very little to do with political and economic reforms, seeing them as dangerous to the continued dominance of the Chinese Communist Party.
November 22, 2025
this book is worth reading bc it's the only biography of hu yaobang in English. do I think this book is amazing, free of flaws? no.
this book tried to be too many things at once. it wanted to be a biography and a full ccp history guide, which made it fall short for me. the first half of the book felt like world building and it more about the politics around hu rather than hu itself. he was kinda lost in the plot. the second half felt a lot better. but idk for a biography i didn't learn too much about him. his personal life wasn't really expanded. characters in his life were introduced as pivotal to his decisions but rarely mentioned again.
it felt like the author was trying to showcase him as this harbinger of democracy, which yes ok, but hu also didn't want to abolish the ccp. the author was trying to fit him into some western mold of an advocate of democracy without the nuance. also the author reallyyyy likes his protagonist, like hu's shortcomings and flaws were barely mentioned. it felt like I'm reading some homer-esque epic at times.
this book tried to be too many things at once. it wanted to be a biography and a full ccp history guide, which made it fall short for me. the first half of the book felt like world building and it more about the politics around hu rather than hu itself. he was kinda lost in the plot. the second half felt a lot better. but idk for a biography i didn't learn too much about him. his personal life wasn't really expanded. characters in his life were introduced as pivotal to his decisions but rarely mentioned again.
it felt like the author was trying to showcase him as this harbinger of democracy, which yes ok, but hu also didn't want to abolish the ccp. the author was trying to fit him into some western mold of an advocate of democracy without the nuance. also the author reallyyyy likes his protagonist, like hu's shortcomings and flaws were barely mentioned. it felt like I'm reading some homer-esque epic at times.
April 17, 2026
苏葆立主要是依靠中文网络资料完成这本书，基本上可以看作是对中文资料的整合再分析。可能是受限于语言能力，他对这些资料的理解存有不少错误。在行文时，由于搜集的史料不够，使得某些章节几乎变为中共党史的笼统概述，没有呈现胡耀邦在这些重要关头的作为。此外，完全没有提到胡的逝世如何引爆八九民运。译者则完全不合格，没有寻找原文核对人名、地名和职务，甚至出现了“中共中央委员会首席执行官”“中央军委总书记”等离谱翻译，大大影响了全书质量。
January 6, 2025
A comprehensive book about Hu
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews