The divinities frescoed in the ceilings awoke.
They won’t succeed because we are gods… Sicilians never want to improve because they think themselves perfect. their vanity is stronger than their misery
Those desiccated trees yearning away under bleached sky bore many a message…
There are wonderful artful excesses in this book, the descriptions of places, paintings, people, artworks leap off the page like heavily applied paint. The erotic discoveries of nephew Tancredi and the beautiful Angelica through the forgotten rooms of the Donnafugata palace simulate sex through entrances and exits of secret, or hidden, unexplored rooms. These rooms seem to grow both in number and possibility as the two lovers explore them. The effect is like tromp-l’oeil: we see more than what is there – the image endlessly expanding through corridors the way architectural and divine figures ascend into the heavens of cathedrals: see the quadratura effect of Fra Andrea Pozzo in The Apotheosis of St. Ignatius, ceiling fresco, Church of Sant’Ignazio, Rome. 1685–1694.
As I got near the end of this age of change novel, I wondered if I would ever get to read it one more time before my own departure from this earth. I know, I’m too easily influenced by books. You see, old Don Fabrizio, The Prince, the Leopard of the story, sees his own decline and that of his ruling class of Sicilian nobles. Change is as constant as the desire for everything to remain the same.
The whole book is like a contemplative soliloquy – an ideal form to take in the passing of time and an entire era. It can take in the sumptuous feasts at a ball, the pettiness of all of us, the landscape and the smells, the privileges and miseries, the pain of lost love, astronomy, the attachment of animals to masters, the mysteries of lost peach crops and on and on. Hostages are dismembered, poverty violates opportunity, the rich and miserly plunder and impoverish, wars kill naïve young men to fester in palace orchards. I’m only skimming the surface of the encyclopaedic subjects covered effortlessly here. The number of subjects covered expresses the weight of what will be lost through the passage of time and human predilection for change. Only Don Fabrizio can look back on his observations since he takes little part in the change that transforms Sicily with the unification of Italy. He pushes the marriage of his impoverished nephew, a minor prince, to the richest of the emerging class of opportunists, the Sedaras, in the same way he accepts and even encourages the yes vote in the unification plebiscite.
Between the pride and intellectuality of his mother and the sensuality and irresponsibility of his father, poor Prince Fabrizio lived in perpetual discomfort under his Jove-like frown, watching the ruin of his own class and his own inheritance without making, still less, wanting to make, any move to change it.
I couldn’t help notice how observant Lampedusa is of the cycles of political change. The 19thC becomes the central point through which we can see the libertine excesses of the 18thc nobility through the decline of the brother-in-law, the 19thC rise of democratic and nationalistic fervour, republicanism and the decline of the aristocracy and into the 20thC & 21stC, the patterns of voting against one’s interests, the rise of the liberal classes under the banner of freedom and rights to self-determination. You can stand still and think you’ve seen it all before.
But it’s really the sumptuousness of it all that makes me hope I get to read it once more. This is my third time. I don’t want to miss its blinding beauty and equally penetrating observations:
It was a garden for the blind: a constant offence to the eyes, a pleasure strong if somewhat crude to the nose.
And in this garden, the world intrudes:
He remembered the nausea diffused throughout the entire villa by certain sweetish odours before their cause was traced: the corpse of a young soldier … under the lemon tree.
This may be one of the most extraordinary books you could ever read.