Trust

by Cynthia Ozick

This rare and vintage book is a perfect addition to any bibliophile's collection

Genres: Fiction, Novels, 20th Century, American, Literary Fiction, Jewish

576 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1966

About the author

Recipient of the first Rea Award for the Short Story (in 1976; other winners Rea honorees include Lorrie Moore, John Updike, Alice Munro), an American Academy of Arts and Letters Mildred and Harold Strauss Living Award, and the PEN/Malamud award in 2008.

Upon publication of her 1983 The Shawl, Edmund White wrote in the New York Times, "Miss Ozick strikes me as the best American writer to have emerged in recent years...Judaism has given to her what Catholicism gave to Flannery O'Connor."

Reviews

[Spencer · Rating 5 out of 5]

I admired the hell out of this novel. Tedious, ponderous, ridiculous, magnificent. Don't know that I will recommend it to anyone but I want to read it over and over. More thoughts forthcoming!

[Robert Wechsler · Rating 4 out of 5]

What a debut novel! The prose of the first-person narrator in Cynthia Ozick’s Trust (1966) is propulsive, twisted, searching, surprising, very intelligent, and overdone. Despite the quality of the dialogue, I kept rooting for the narrative to come back, please, because it’s so much more interesting. Even when the dialogue is at its best (and it gets better, but more frequent, in the second half), it too is overdone and, for the most part, not nearly as singular or involving as the prose. And all this for the narrow story of an unusual family that’s scarcely a family at all.

This is that sort of debut — breathtaking and icon breaking, with no prisoners taken — and the great writing here is worth the bumps. But don't read this if you need to understand everything the narrator or the other characters are saying.

[Mark · Rating 1 out of 5]

What I learned from this book is that I shouldn't try to read thick, Jamesian, gnarled prose as I try to fall asleep at night after reading students' papers all day. I've tried to read this book on-and-off for over a year, but it's just not what I'm looking for; I refuse to slog through another 300 pages when there is a giant list of books I actually want to read and might even enjoy. If I ever get sent to prison, I promise this book will go to the top of my list; then I will read and maybe even enjoy it all day long. Until then, then I've got better things to use my brain for other than glossing 10 archaic words every other page.

[Debi · Rating 1 out of 5]

Ok, so I finished this book and I'm demoting it to a single star. It's not the worst book I've ever read. It has those occasional quotes that are interesting. But it's artificial. None of the characters are believable or likable...so it's hard to get involved with them or care much about what they're up to. I found myself grousing through the entire book at the inane plot, telling myself that the book wasn't "about" the plot helped keep me going but seriously, it just wasn't worth it. The jokes were too precious. The philosophy too contrived. The "art", that the author seemed so intent upon thrusting in my face, simply bored me in the end. This book was a waste of my time.

[Jerry · Rating 4 out of 5]

Good first novel. Surprised at the number of negative reviews.

[P · Rating 2 out of 5]

Reading this much ponderous detail about the lives of the American upper class makes me want to vote for Bernie Sanders twice.

[Clair Schaler · Rating 5 out of 5]

Wonderful and already worth another read.

[Vito Alberto]

Matteo Marchesini once said that the critic is a philosopher who doesn't believe in philosophy anymore. Cynthia Ozick is the greatest literary critic of our times: in this novel and in its afterword, one can find what the critic believes in – or, at least, what the critic believed in at a certain point in time for a certain portion of time.

This just written is such a dumb thing. I don't known what to think of this book: I started reading it in the worst moment of my life so far; it took me ages to finish it; and yet I don't want anything back from this book.

So weird, so grandiose.

[Bess · Rating 4 out of 5]

I admire this book, and liked it despite it’s wordy prose and because of it. I would not likely recommend it but it is a singular read, and a book one could read many times and come away with a different understanding. I just finished it and am a little dazed.

[Stuart · Rating 5 out of 5]

I thought this was one of the very best books I've ever read. Dense, complex, interesting and very funny.

[Ellen]

Found at my latest favorite bookstore, Kaboom Books in Houston, Texas. [http://www.kaboombooks.com/]

[Josyane Kelly · Rating 1 out of 5]

Awful book. Couldn't finish it. Written in the third person.

[Mara · Rating 4 out of 5]

difficult but worth it