Further support for my heartfelt contention that nothing worth a damn ever came out of a committee, certainly nothing in a creative, artistic or meaningful mode...
It's hard for me to crap on this book with a one-star rating, especially since it was a birthday gift, features Margaret Atwood's name on the cover, falls under the category of pandemic lit (a genre I have a fondness for myself having engaged in a small pandemic lit reading group during that shittiest of years), and is inspired by Chaucer's Canterbury Tales and Boccaccio's Decameron, two of the all-time greatest works of literature. So I was looking forward to it, when I discovered what Fourteen Days was all about and how it was written. But while Chaucer labored on his own for decades to develop his fascinating collection of "sundry folk" and craft their collection of mostly brilliant tales using the frame device of a story-telling contest on the road to Canterbury, the only remarkable thing about this rushed mess of half-baked, mostly dull stories told by a collection of crabby New Yorkers on the rooftop of their crappy apartment building over the course of two weeks at the beginning of the lockdown is the way Atwood and Doug Preston convinced 34 of their fellow writers to join them on this project, each author contributing a story without attribution with Preston apparently (according to the "note" which kicks off the book) weaving them together in the pandemic frame device.
So...kudos to Atwood and Preston for assembling this collection of sundry writers to join them on this potentially significant project. Sadly, however, as with most committee work, it fails to move beyond the initial idea into something meaningful and remains a group of unrelated stories, most of which feel phoned in by the authors, both great and small.
Here's what Fourteen Days promises in the opening note: "Above all, Fourteen Days is a celebration of the power of stories. since long before the invention of writing, we human beings have faced our gravest challenges by telling stories. When we are confronted with war, violence, terror--or a pandemic--we tell stories to sort things out and push back against a frightening and incomprehensible world. Stories tell us where we've been and where we're going. They make sense of the senseless and bring order to disorder. They transmit our values across generations and affirm our ideas. They skewer the powerful, expose the fraudulent, and give voice to the disenfranchised .... stories are what make us human."
And that's so true for The Canterbury Tales (and for most of what we call great literature). But it has almost nothing to do with the contents of Fourteen Days, most of which fails to shed any light on the human condition at all, and adds no sense to the senseless and pretty much collapses into disorder by the fourteenth day, despite Preston's best efforts to craft his frame device which, like Chaucer's, showcases the squabbling story tellers, and sadly outshines most of the stories they tell. If only the different authors had been up to the challenge of providing better tales for their tellers, this might have become an excellent reflection of life during the pandemic. But as it is, this collection of stories feels more like just another victim of the pandemic instead of something that will transcend time and endure to show future generations of readers what life was like during this time in history.
As a great fan of Chaucer, here's what I did: I began the book with great anticipation and pen in hand. I scribbled a hasty matrix in the back of my book with apartment numbers and story tellers: 1A) The Super, 2B) Vinegar, 2D) The Lady with the Rings, 3D) Darrow, 4D) Whitney, 5E) Amnesia, et al, sketching out the 24 or so tenants by apartment number and "pilgrim" name, along with the story tellers who join them along the way on their journey, a la Chaucer's Canon's Yeoman. Then I attempted to provide a short descriptor for each story, hoping to trace the thematic elements and establish correspondences between the tales and their tellers, along with some pertinent details about each "pilgrim": their job, gender, ethnicity, status, etc., which like with Chaucer's tellers, generally reflects on their tales.
Ha. What a waste of time, attempting to establish my own order on the disorder of this mishmash of stories. By the halfway point I realized my efforts were going to be in vain, but I kept at it and as the days continued the lack of structure and unity became more and more apparent because unlike Chaucer who has labored to create thematic and structural arcs throughout his collection of stories, shedding light on his contemporary societal hierarchies and providing sharp commentary on the power structures of his time, our authors in Fourteen Days each seem to be writing in a vacuum without any idea of the order of their tales, who their teller is, who is responding to whom, or what themes and concerns they might be addressing. Our 36 authors fail to provide much in the way of correspondences among the stories or even provide much real insight into the inequities and fragilities of life during the pandemic or the terrible challenges we were facing then.
That's not to say that it's all a disaster in Fourteen Days. There is a small handful of gems here to be found among the approximately 40 stories, beyond the interactions of our feuding tale tellers in Preston's frame device. For me, I did not want to ruin the fun by flipping to the "About the Contributors" at the end of the book to find out who wrote what. But when I finally did, I quickly discovered my two favorite pieces were written by the two most regarded authors in the project (fancy that), Atwood herself and Ishmael Reed. And then I learned that one of my other favorites was written by none other than Erica Jong, whom I had assumed was long dead. Mirabile dictu. There's life in the old lady yet.
Reed's piece might be the best of all, and possibly the most pertinent. In it, his "pilgrim," the Poet (a Black professor of poetry with connections in the New York publishing world who has been recently asked to write a life-coaching book instructing white people on techniques about how to get along with Black people), relates a story from just before the lockdown when he is invited by a pair of his former students to join a pandemic reading circle at an art gallery that will be exploring "classical readings about the plague," beginning with the Decameron. The reading collapses in hilarious chaos by the second session as the academics and artists attending the discussion become bogged down in their various contemporary concerns finding Boccacio to be privileged, Eurocentric, homophobic, antisemitic, misogynistic, classist, and able-ist, among the long litany of horrified objections voiced by the participants. Reed must have greatly enjoyed himself here, skewering both the contemporary concerns along with the dusty classics, and also poking some fun at a number of his fellow writers on the project. I would love to know what Reed really thought about joining this group of mostly much younger writers.
+++++++++++++++++
Well-intentioned birthday gift from my brother. Sorry!