Is the Welfare State Justified?

by Daniel Shapiro

In this book, Daniel Shapiro argues that the dominant positions in contemporary political philosophy - egalitarianism, positive rights theory, communitarianism, and many forms of liberalism - should converge in a rejection of central welfare state institutions. He examines how major welfare institutions, such as government-financed and -administered retirement pensions, national health insurance, and programs for the needy, actually work. Comparing them to compulsory private insurance and private charities, Shapiro argues that the dominant perspectives in political philosophy mistakenly think that their principles support the welfare state. Instead, egalitarians, positive rights theorists, communitarians, and liberals have misunderstood the implications of their own principles, which in fact support more market-based or libertarian institutional conclusions than they may realize. Shapiro’s book is unusual in its combination of political philosophy with social science. Its focus is not limited to any particular country; rather it examines welfare states in affluent democracies and their market alternatives.
• Argues that supporters of the welfare state should, following their own premises, actually oppose it
• Does comparative institutional compares real welfare state institutions with real market-based alternatives
• Combines focus on basic principles in political philosophy with social science analysis of institutions

Genres: Philosophy

344 pages, Paperback

First published July 30, 2003

About the author

There is more than one author by this name in the Goodreads data base.

For the American poet, see Daniel Shapiro

Reviews

[Brian Mullis · Rating 2 out of 5]

Discusses healthcare public policy alternatives, and how they fit with philosophical belief systems such as egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and communitarianism.