I'm fairly well versed in security and I like security books. I don't know how to say something nice about this book. Maybe I can just say that the book has credentialed authors, and the random collection of sentences within are well footnoted. The structure, the editing, and the writing are all on equal footing, and it succeeds as a collection of unedited notes.
This is a complete waste of time.
Examples:
p. 64: Mentions a U of Maryland sorority sister who used a bunch of "F-bombs" in an email. It then says that she will have some work to do to reestablish her online reputation and polish her brand. It makes no mention that the email went viral and was even subject to a celebrity read by Michael Shannon. This was a sort of a key part of the example that would've made the paragraph make sense.
p. unknown: It goes on about how all information you put online is being put into databases and tracked, and then mentions, almost as a drunken afterthought, that it's essential to build and maintain an extensive online presence.
P. 91 (and others): This book is FULL of random, pointless interviews, such as page 91, which goes on for two pages about a mother tracking her daughter's phone and getting caught by the daughter. This is a two sentence point. Tell your kids you're tracking them. There is no need for an interview with a random person about nothing. You don't need to explain the cheese sandwich to me. Just put "CHEESE SANDWICH" on the menu.
p. 81 (Uh, what? quote of the day): "If you want a simple way to use email without worrying about snooping, just give up and assume that all of your emails will be snooped on." Is this a security book? Would the 15 year old who wrote this please come down to the office? We need to discuss pgp and email encryption before we deep dive into the basics of sentence structure.
p 224. "In February 2013, University of Pittsburgh researcher Andrew Schwartz's years of brain research paid off, as surgeons implanted four microchips in a paralyzed patient's brain that translate her brain's signals into movement in robotic equipment, so that she can feed herself ice cream through brain signals sent to a robotic arm."
Again, teen ghost writer, this sentence doesn't say what I think the author wants it to say.
If I didn't already immensely dislike this book, interspersed within the nonsense are more random, pointless quotes than an old school BBS.
While I do think that people should read more about potential security threats, I can't recommend that they read this version of them. Please read something else.