A solid theological introduction to Hebrews that is approachable for those with some experience without being simplistic. I read this at the tale end of preparation for a sermon series in Hebrews to make sure there are not themes I was overlooking in my prep, and I was not disappointed. Here there are good explanations of major themes I expected, and in addition a few insights that I had not considered. But there is nothing unexpected or radical here, which is what I wanted — this is a seasoned and mature perspective. He is thoughtful and careful, maybe a bit slow to get to the point on occasion, but not terribly so.
For those who are familiar, he does briefly interact with Moffit’s work on atonement and I think rightfully correct some of his more radical overstatements while warmly welcoming the positive contributions Moffit has made. I was very happy to see this, and this was helpful to me as it’s easy to be blown to and fro by one fad in atonement theology to another (though, maybe everyone keeps looking for more because dominate voices in reformation theology continue to obsess over one picture of atonement theology and one picture of the cross and neglect the rest).
Johnson does see the chief risk of the Christians addressed in this letter as returning to old covenant forms of worship, which I don’t personally subscribe to. He also is quick to explain, in his own way, true Christians never fall away, which I do not subscribe to either. Neither of these perspectives dominate the book — though, if he didn’t see things in this light, I think this could have led him to offer more insight as to why and what Christians might fall. And I wonder if these errors (as I see it) would lead to his writing having more of the spark and urgency of the actual letter itself. In other words, maybe Johnson’s work doesn’t have the urgency of Hebrews because, unlike the writer of Hebrews, Johnson has no concern that any true Christians would actually fall away. I don’t intend to be too critical here, this is certainly a skillful introduction.
This book is not a guide to application, but I would have appreciated a little more guidance here. Likely, those with experience will be able to make application on their own throughout. But his brief conclusion at the end of the book with a couple paragraphs of exhortation made me wish there was just a little more of that sprinkled throughout the book, as the Hebrew writer himself does. At the least, it would have likely made the book feel a little less slow to be reminded briefly at the beginning and ending of each chapter of the similar situations we endure that make this particular chapter on Hebrews’ theology worth reading.
I do appreciate what I have read of this series. I hope Crossway puts out something like this for the OT if they can muster the scholarship and avoid too much of a reformational spin.