What do you think?
Rate this book
Form and Fortification: The Art of Military Architecture in Renaissance Italy
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
May 19, 2025
'The tension and interplay between novelty and tradition [...] represent a creative dynamic. [...] Renaissance culture trod a paradoxical path, obsessively striving for modernity through inspiration from the distant past. [...]
In architecture, the dialectic of old and new manifested itself most forcefully in fortification. [...] Functional adaptation were often built into fortifications from the beginning, in anticipation of the inevitable shift from war to peace. The changeable character of such cognate technologies mirrored the multifaceted identities of their designer and builders, who moved across the blurry borders of art, architecture, landscape, and military engineering depending on the political and practical exigencies of the moment. [...]
Such cognate technologies test the limits of the art historian's vision. They alert is to modes of resemblance that explode petrified disciplinary classifications, demanding the scrutiny of forms in all their multidimensional complexity. [...]
The sixteenth century was an age governed by webs of similitude that crisscrossed all domains of experience and education. Here the 'universe was folded upon itself: the earth echoing the sky, faces seeing themselves reflected in the stars, and plants holding within their stems secrets that were of use to man.' Before the rise of modern taxonomic systems, which divided the cosmos into discrete islands of specialized knowledge, 'sixteenth century man' still conceived empirical reality as a continuous 'complex of kinships, resemblances, and affinities,' a reality 'in which language and things were endlessly interwoven.' Cognate technologies point to this irrepressible period impulse to link seemingly unrelated things.
Unique historical circumstances, including a revolution in new media, amplified this associative consciousness. When it emerged in the Renaissance as a ubiquitous design medium, paper opened a fluid space for artists and architects to draw, redraw, rescale and remix diverse ancient and modern building types, ornament, and machines. [...]
Language registered and encouraged these morphological slippages and exchanges. The technical lexicon was far less standardized in the early modern period than it is today, and its semantic ambiguities reflected the porous boundaries of premodern technological and typological families.[...]
In their totality, cognate technologies and their representations were not just products of a worldview - they actively conspired to reify and construct it. Most significantly, they reconfigured the archaic analogy of microcosm and macrocosm, which posited a structural correspondence between small-scale and large-scale systems in the universe. [...]
This analogic worldview was perpetuated - indeed underwritten- by the work of Renaissance artists, architects, and engineers. [...] The design and construction of cognate technologies had far-reaching epistemic consequence. As these technologies conquered the world, they irreversibly wove the logic of their correspondences into the fabric of early modern reality.'
In architecture, the dialectic of old and new manifested itself most forcefully in fortification. [...] Functional adaptation were often built into fortifications from the beginning, in anticipation of the inevitable shift from war to peace. The changeable character of such cognate technologies mirrored the multifaceted identities of their designer and builders, who moved across the blurry borders of art, architecture, landscape, and military engineering depending on the political and practical exigencies of the moment. [...]
Such cognate technologies test the limits of the art historian's vision. They alert is to modes of resemblance that explode petrified disciplinary classifications, demanding the scrutiny of forms in all their multidimensional complexity. [...]
The sixteenth century was an age governed by webs of similitude that crisscrossed all domains of experience and education. Here the 'universe was folded upon itself: the earth echoing the sky, faces seeing themselves reflected in the stars, and plants holding within their stems secrets that were of use to man.' Before the rise of modern taxonomic systems, which divided the cosmos into discrete islands of specialized knowledge, 'sixteenth century man' still conceived empirical reality as a continuous 'complex of kinships, resemblances, and affinities,' a reality 'in which language and things were endlessly interwoven.' Cognate technologies point to this irrepressible period impulse to link seemingly unrelated things.
Unique historical circumstances, including a revolution in new media, amplified this associative consciousness. When it emerged in the Renaissance as a ubiquitous design medium, paper opened a fluid space for artists and architects to draw, redraw, rescale and remix diverse ancient and modern building types, ornament, and machines. [...]
Language registered and encouraged these morphological slippages and exchanges. The technical lexicon was far less standardized in the early modern period than it is today, and its semantic ambiguities reflected the porous boundaries of premodern technological and typological families.[...]
In their totality, cognate technologies and their representations were not just products of a worldview - they actively conspired to reify and construct it. Most significantly, they reconfigured the archaic analogy of microcosm and macrocosm, which posited a structural correspondence between small-scale and large-scale systems in the universe. [...]
This analogic worldview was perpetuated - indeed underwritten- by the work of Renaissance artists, architects, and engineers. [...] The design and construction of cognate technologies had far-reaching epistemic consequence. As these technologies conquered the world, they irreversibly wove the logic of their correspondences into the fabric of early modern reality.'
Displaying 1 of 1 review