Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Pessimism, Quietism and Nature as Refuge

Rate this book
How do we, as individuals, accommodate a pessimistic and misanthropic view of the world? If the human condition is impossible to ameliorate, then how should we live? How do we bring about the wellbeing and happiness we seek in the face of such overwhelming evidence that our condition is and will remain very bad indeed and owes significantly to our own entrenched failings?

In this thoughtful and insightful book the philosopher David E. Cooper explores this fundamental dilemma. He rejects an activist commitment to radical improvement of the human condition, and instead advocates quietism as a way to live as well and as happily as we can. This quietist position, which draws on Buddhist and Daoist ideas as well as those from western philosophy, is supplemented by finding refuge from the everyday human world in a "place" both "other" and "better" than that world. Such places of refuge, Cooper argues, are best found in natural environments.

Refuge in nature, whether a garden or a wilderness, cultivates an attunement to, or a sense of, the way of things, and thereby invites assurance of being "in the truth" and the enjoyment that such assurance fosters. The quietist who finds refuge in nature lives as well as and as happily as anyone can do who accepts the negative verdict on the human condition.

168 pages, Paperback

Published November 26, 2024

1 person is currently reading
57 people want to read

About the author

David E. Cooper

70 books12 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (23%)
4 stars
8 (47%)
3 stars
3 (17%)
2 stars
2 (11%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Quan Nguyen.
111 reviews1 follower
October 21, 2025
While there is some good and interesting explorations, the main points (esp. against activism and for nature as another or a better place) are not very well argued. It ends up the sort of nature appreciation that a Tory would have
Displaying 1 of 1 review