What do you think?
Rate this book
พิพิธภัณฑ์แห่งผู้เป็นอื่น
‘พิพิธภัณฑ์’ คืออะไร?
เพชรน้ำเอกแห่งอารยธรรม?
ประจักษ์พยานต่ออัจฉริยภาพทางความคิดสร้างสรรค์ของมนุษย์?
รูปธรรมของความรุ่มรวยทางวัฒนธรรม ความเป็นเลิศในศิลปวิทยา?
หรือแท้ที่จริงสถานที่แห่งนี้คือ…
โกดังเก็บของโจร…
ประจักษ์พยานต่อความโหดเหี้ยมอำมหิตของจักรวรรดินิยมตะวันตก…
รูปธรรมของการรีดนาทาเร้น ขูดเลือดขูดเนื้อ และย่ำยีบีฑา…
เบื้องหน้าของสถานที่แห่งนี้ คือพิพิธภัณฑ์ที่ทำหน้าที่จัดแสดงโลกอันแปลกประหลาดของผู้คน “ดั้งเดิม” (primitive) หรือ “ชนเผ่า” ที่อยู่ห่างไกลออกไปหรือมีชีวิตในช่วงอดีตกาลนานโพ้น
แต่เบื้องหลังของที่นี่เป็นอย่างไร? อดัม คูเปอร์ พร้อมทำหน้าที่มัคคุเทศก์ในการนำเดินชมครั้งนี้…
เพชรน้ำเอกแห่งอารยธรรม?
ประจักษ์พยานต่ออัจฉริยภาพทางความคิดสร้างสรรค์ของมนุษย์?
รูปธรรมของความรุ่มรวยทางวัฒนธรรม ความเป็นเลิศในศิลปวิทยา?
หรือแท้ที่จริงสถานที่แห่งนี้คือ…
โกดังเก็บของโจร…
ประจักษ์พยานต่อความโหดเหี้ยมอำมหิตของจักรวรรดินิยมตะวันตก…
รูปธรรมของการรีดนาทาเร้น ขูดเลือดขูดเนื้อ และย่ำยีบีฑา…
เบื้องหน้าของสถานที่แห่งนี้ คือพิพิธภัณฑ์ที่ทำหน้าที่จัดแสดงโลกอันแปลกประหลาดของผู้คน “ดั้งเดิม” (primitive) หรือ “ชนเผ่า” ที่อยู่ห่างไกลออกไปหรือมีชีวิตในช่วงอดีตกาลนานโพ้น
แต่เบื้องหลังของที่นี่เป็นอย่างไร? อดัม คูเปอร์ พร้อมทำหน้าที่มัคคุเทศก์ในการนำเดินชมครั้งนี้…
560 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2023
36 people are currently reading
3328 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 26 of 26 reviews
April 3, 2024
Content warnings: colonialism, racism, xenophobia, genocide
3.5 stars
I...wanted to love this. As a former museum curator at a museum that straddled social history and environmental science, the content of this book was both very much within my wheelhouse and more than a little outside of it. But in developing the exhibition I worked on, I had object loans from some of the museums discussed in this book, so it kind of IS in my wheelhouse more than I anticipated.
So. The discussion of museum history and the ways in which the big name museums and their collections were established? Really effective. Really engaging. Really relevant. These museums refuse, time and time again, to repatriate not only objects but human remains.
But. There were very definitely times when it was apparent that this book was written by an old white man. Yes, he's a knowledgeable old white man. But there's no way that a book published in 2023 should use a small "a" when talking about Aboriginal Australians. And he at times falls very much into the traps of "if we don't protect these objects, who will?" and "should we let minorities tell their stories in museums when their stories don't make sense to us nice white folks?" And, like, that's exactly what your damned book is arguing against, my dude...
So yeah. It was solid up to a point. And then it kind of tanked. Sigh.
3.5 stars
I...wanted to love this. As a former museum curator at a museum that straddled social history and environmental science, the content of this book was both very much within my wheelhouse and more than a little outside of it. But in developing the exhibition I worked on, I had object loans from some of the museums discussed in this book, so it kind of IS in my wheelhouse more than I anticipated.
So. The discussion of museum history and the ways in which the big name museums and their collections were established? Really effective. Really engaging. Really relevant. These museums refuse, time and time again, to repatriate not only objects but human remains.
But. There were very definitely times when it was apparent that this book was written by an old white man. Yes, he's a knowledgeable old white man. But there's no way that a book published in 2023 should use a small "a" when talking about Aboriginal Australians. And he at times falls very much into the traps of "if we don't protect these objects, who will?" and "should we let minorities tell their stories in museums when their stories don't make sense to us nice white folks?" And, like, that's exactly what your damned book is arguing against, my dude...
So yeah. It was solid up to a point. And then it kind of tanked. Sigh.
May 13, 2024
This book was thoroughly researched. Even though I found a lot of it interesting, it really told me more about the establishment of museums than I wanted to know. I would certainly hate being a museum administrator today. I just could not cope with the culture wars surrounding what is art, who owns it, who gets to see it etc. If you care about that debate, you will probably enjoy this book more than I did. I received a free copy of this book from the publisher.
October 23, 2023
WESTERNERS' PAST IS KNOCKING ON THEIR EVERY DOOR
The Museum of Other People clearly rides the wave of the trend and is written to address questions and situations that have made headlines in so many ways recently.
Kuper, from his perspective of an anthropologist, retraces the full history of that bit old-fashioned kind of museums that host (or hosted) tools, artifacts, and even human remains of peoples and societies from around the world. He also explains how and when mainstays such as the British Museum, the Smithsonian and the Quai Branly saw the light and what they have done so far to either acknowledge their colonialist origin, correct their path or at least improve their methods.
Moving forward with your reading, prepare to be sometimes shocked by the ingenuity and simplicity of the colonialists or by the cunningness of the oppressed emerging from the pages. Be ready to hear of how even the brightest minds of the 19th century fell into the trap of progress and civilization or how indigenous peoples at times succumbed to a lust for greed and power.
The book also asks many questions.
Can cities like London, Paris, or Washington still host artifacts or artworks coming from Africa, South America, Australia? Do they have the right to do so? Have they ever?
Should Europe and North America give back the treasures they accumulated during the colonial era? How to prove if the pieces were freely traded or forcefully acquired?
And, last but not least, can Westerners' ancestors be forever blamed for the turns our world is taking? Can Westerners be trusted again? These ones may be more implicit, unconscious even, but they voice a dilemma that might have popped up in the mind of many.
Does the book answer all the questions it poses? Not sure if it does, but it provides the reader with all the tools to come up with their own solution. A dangerous move, because Kuper mildly and hardly takes any stand and thus exposes his own work to the threat of being used to prove everything and its opposite.
However, it is good to quote one of the very few clearly-expressed ideas of the author, synthesized in this sentence (which is repeated at least twice across the book):
Indeed, the book teaches us that innovation and change may save ethnology museums from post-colonial damnation but that this will most likely mean compromise, restitution, acceptance.
So, while reminding us that we are all humans but some of us may have sinned more than others, this book left me wondering if in the future we should act differently, keeping in mind that the Western approach to culture and preservation may be a very good one and well established but not necessarily the best choice for everyone - and that instead of pointing the finger or act like saviors, we may have to accept our different priorities.
Find the original version and more book reviews on Humana Lens
The Museum of Other People clearly rides the wave of the trend and is written to address questions and situations that have made headlines in so many ways recently.
Kuper, from his perspective of an anthropologist, retraces the full history of that bit old-fashioned kind of museums that host (or hosted) tools, artifacts, and even human remains of peoples and societies from around the world. He also explains how and when mainstays such as the British Museum, the Smithsonian and the Quai Branly saw the light and what they have done so far to either acknowledge their colonialist origin, correct their path or at least improve their methods.
Moving forward with your reading, prepare to be sometimes shocked by the ingenuity and simplicity of the colonialists or by the cunningness of the oppressed emerging from the pages. Be ready to hear of how even the brightest minds of the 19th century fell into the trap of progress and civilization or how indigenous peoples at times succumbed to a lust for greed and power.
The book also asks many questions.
Can cities like London, Paris, or Washington still host artifacts or artworks coming from Africa, South America, Australia? Do they have the right to do so? Have they ever?
Should Europe and North America give back the treasures they accumulated during the colonial era? How to prove if the pieces were freely traded or forcefully acquired?
And, last but not least, can Westerners' ancestors be forever blamed for the turns our world is taking? Can Westerners be trusted again? These ones may be more implicit, unconscious even, but they voice a dilemma that might have popped up in the mind of many.
Does the book answer all the questions it poses? Not sure if it does, but it provides the reader with all the tools to come up with their own solution. A dangerous move, because Kuper mildly and hardly takes any stand and thus exposes his own work to the threat of being used to prove everything and its opposite.
However, it is good to quote one of the very few clearly-expressed ideas of the author, synthesized in this sentence (which is repeated at least twice across the book):
Fear of controversy freezes innovation.
Indeed, the book teaches us that innovation and change may save ethnology museums from post-colonial damnation but that this will most likely mean compromise, restitution, acceptance.
So, while reminding us that we are all humans but some of us may have sinned more than others, this book left me wondering if in the future we should act differently, keeping in mind that the Western approach to culture and preservation may be a very good one and well established but not necessarily the best choice for everyone - and that instead of pointing the finger or act like saviors, we may have to accept our different priorities.
Find the original version and more book reviews on Humana Lens
March 24, 2025
White guys have been stealing and/or co-opting other people’s things for centuries, sometimes even from other white guys. Here are some examples.
June 18, 2024
This book was...not about what I thought it was about. I don't think so, anyway. The fact is that I'm not actually sure quite what it was about, exactly. (As a side note, I have observed that anthropologists, of whom the author is apparently an eminent one, are generally lousy writers. I first noticed it in my Anthropology 101 class in college. Why is this? The subject is, in theory, fascinating. Why aren't they better at writing about it?) The first half of the book (which I found rather jumbled, scattershot, and not always terribly interesting) recounted the history and evolution of 19th and early 20th century anthropological and ethnological museums (ie, "Museums of Other People"). This was related to the development of the big encyclopedic museums (Louvre, British Museum, Met, etc.) but not exactly the same thing because these latter institutions focused on art rather than ethnology and those two things are different and the study of foreign/exotic peoples was of course separate from the study of the great Western/European civilizations etc., etc. zzzzzzzzz. As I said, I found it difficult to follow. Things picked up a bit in the second half - the chapters about human remains ("Bones of Contention" - nice title) and NAGPRA were sufficiently interesting to keep me going, but the narrative often got bogged down in the fine distinctions between art and artifact; anthropology, ethnology, and ethnography; whether Africa and Oceania should be in the same gallery or not. I suppose these questions of museum theory and the "otherness" of certain peoples and the purposes of museums are valid and (sometimes) important, but this book was just too all over the place. Was it trying to be a history? Who is the intended audience? What is being advocated? What is the anchor or thesis of Adam Kuper's argument? I was never able to figure it out.
October 27, 2023
An enjoyable read. But this definitely a book for a student or professor in GLAMs more than the general reader. Though I did enjoy it I did struggle through some chapters - but that is just my personal relationship an academic reading. Regardless, an important discussion presented here.
April 9, 2024
During his distinguished career in anthropology, Adam Kuper has thrived not just in the academic world but also as a writer of books for nonspecialists about the history, ideas, trends, and controversies in his field. I have read a couple of these books. They are lucid, witty, and backed by deep reading in the primary and secondary literature. In other words, they are rewarding and a pleasure to read.
His new book has the same virtues. But this time, instead of focusing on anthropology itself, he takes a long and critical look at what can—and should—be learned not from books about anthropology but from the materials of anthropology: the vast collections of objects displayed in “Museums of Other People.”
Kuper tells us that these museums began to appear the 1830s and 1840s, mainly in Britain, France, and Germany, and were intended to introduce Europeans to an exotic world of “other people” who lived faraway or long ago. Kuper then goes on to tell us how these museums increased in size and number—and with them the discipline of anthropology itself grew and evolved—over the next hundred years, as various voices tried to command the conversation about “other people.”
In this part of Kuper’s narrative we encounter the voices of racists, geographical determinists, colonialists, biologists, anthropology’s founders, art historians, and others arguing about how to organize and interpret the artifacts and understand the worldviews of “other people.”
Eventually these voices are joined by voices that question whether any museum that tries to represent the worldview of “other people” can do so without being seen as racist or condescending or a power play.
This leads to the situation “museums of other people” are in today, when every decision about what to exhibit and what an exhibit means is the result of a tug of war between administrators, donors, dealers, outside experts, activists, and the natives—the indigenous people—who are the subjects of the exhibits.
One way of coping with this situation has been to create and build “identity” museums, for example the National Museum of the American Indian, and the National Museum of African American History and Culture.
But Kuper ultimately wants us to envision a different kind of anthropology museum altogether. It would be a museum that downplays ethnic and national identities and instead juxtaposes and challenges all perspectives and viewpoints. It would be a museum that dispenses with the idea that there are “other people.”
Wouldn’t that be nice?
Sadly, I doubt that the museum Kuper envisions is possible in today’s world. Still, I enjoyed the journey I took with Kuper to arrive at his vision. For one thing, the cast of characters included not just people I expected to appear in this book—Lyell, Darwin, Spencer, E.B. Tylor, Franz Boas, Levi-Strauss, Foucault—but also many many others I didn’t expect—artists (Picasso, Braque, Rivera, Kahlo, Kandinsky, Matisse, Duchamp), writers (Henry Adams, Andre Malraux, Wole Soyinka, Octavio Paz), politicians (De Gaulle, Macron), a wealthy donor who doubled as a politician (Nelson Rockefeller), even a movie character (Eric “Killmonger” Stevens from Black Panther), and more.
Also, I enjoyed accompanying Kuper in his visits to more than thirty museums all over the world. He made me want to visit the collections Kuper mentions that I have visited before--to look at them in a new way. And he made me want to visit as many of the others as I can. More than that he made me newly appreciate and want to visit any kind of museum and look at it through Kuper’s penetrating eyes.. That alone will make reading the book a valuable experience for anyone.
Thank you Knopf, Pantheon, Vintage and Anchor for providing an advance copy in galley form for review consideration via NetGalley. Please note: Quotes taken from a galley may change in the final version. (Opinions expressed here are my own.)
His new book has the same virtues. But this time, instead of focusing on anthropology itself, he takes a long and critical look at what can—and should—be learned not from books about anthropology but from the materials of anthropology: the vast collections of objects displayed in “Museums of Other People.”
Kuper tells us that these museums began to appear the 1830s and 1840s, mainly in Britain, France, and Germany, and were intended to introduce Europeans to an exotic world of “other people” who lived faraway or long ago. Kuper then goes on to tell us how these museums increased in size and number—and with them the discipline of anthropology itself grew and evolved—over the next hundred years, as various voices tried to command the conversation about “other people.”
In this part of Kuper’s narrative we encounter the voices of racists, geographical determinists, colonialists, biologists, anthropology’s founders, art historians, and others arguing about how to organize and interpret the artifacts and understand the worldviews of “other people.”
Eventually these voices are joined by voices that question whether any museum that tries to represent the worldview of “other people” can do so without being seen as racist or condescending or a power play.
This leads to the situation “museums of other people” are in today, when every decision about what to exhibit and what an exhibit means is the result of a tug of war between administrators, donors, dealers, outside experts, activists, and the natives—the indigenous people—who are the subjects of the exhibits.
One way of coping with this situation has been to create and build “identity” museums, for example the National Museum of the American Indian, and the National Museum of African American History and Culture.
But Kuper ultimately wants us to envision a different kind of anthropology museum altogether. It would be a museum that downplays ethnic and national identities and instead juxtaposes and challenges all perspectives and viewpoints. It would be a museum that dispenses with the idea that there are “other people.”
Wouldn’t that be nice?
Sadly, I doubt that the museum Kuper envisions is possible in today’s world. Still, I enjoyed the journey I took with Kuper to arrive at his vision. For one thing, the cast of characters included not just people I expected to appear in this book—Lyell, Darwin, Spencer, E.B. Tylor, Franz Boas, Levi-Strauss, Foucault—but also many many others I didn’t expect—artists (Picasso, Braque, Rivera, Kahlo, Kandinsky, Matisse, Duchamp), writers (Henry Adams, Andre Malraux, Wole Soyinka, Octavio Paz), politicians (De Gaulle, Macron), a wealthy donor who doubled as a politician (Nelson Rockefeller), even a movie character (Eric “Killmonger” Stevens from Black Panther), and more.
Also, I enjoyed accompanying Kuper in his visits to more than thirty museums all over the world. He made me want to visit the collections Kuper mentions that I have visited before--to look at them in a new way. And he made me want to visit as many of the others as I can. More than that he made me newly appreciate and want to visit any kind of museum and look at it through Kuper’s penetrating eyes.. That alone will make reading the book a valuable experience for anyone.
Thank you Knopf, Pantheon, Vintage and Anchor for providing an advance copy in galley form for review consideration via NetGalley. Please note: Quotes taken from a galley may change in the final version. (Opinions expressed here are my own.)
April 15, 2024
Depicting the whole history of ethnography and anthropology as disciplines, Adam Kuper's The Museum of Other People: From Colonial Acquisitions to Cosmopolitan Exhibitions begins with the colonial era pursuit of both representative bodies and artifacts, establishment of anthropological institutions and their organizing schema and ends with ruminations and discussions of the present day challenges of repatriating these objects and their racist and exploitative histories.
And while comprehensive, only sporadically did I find the content engaging. Instead of presenting events chronologically, it meanders moving from nation to nation covering the development of anthropology in Britain (British Museum, Pitt Rivers), France and Germany before switching to the United States (Smithsonian). Amongst the nation foci Kuper inserts the different colonial, military or exploration campaigns that sourced many of the objects through trade, theft or military campaign. Many of the key figures are detailed, their origins, education and professional accomplishments. Much is tied to ideas of empire, what constitutes civilization and the still contentious ideas of evolution.
Kuper shows anthropology and ethnography to have had a deeply racist and controlling history, but it is the third section that is most impactful. Here, Kuper shows many of the contemporary notable cases such as the ownership of the Benin Bronzes or litigation for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Here Kuper especially emphasizes the issues of restitution in the face of records versus native expertise. It is for the evidence of the record that Kuper favors, as he too advocates for continuation of these institutions for the greater good of humanity.
Kuper asks and explains what constitutes ownership, the debate of what is 'art'? and the values of the objects to education and understanding of humanity.
A biased and meandering history that does ask some very important questions but stumbles on their answers.
Recommended for those exploring the history of anthropology or looking for sources exploring representation, free speech or working in or serving as a trustee of a museum.
I received a free digital version of this book via NetGalley thanks to the publisher.
And while comprehensive, only sporadically did I find the content engaging. Instead of presenting events chronologically, it meanders moving from nation to nation covering the development of anthropology in Britain (British Museum, Pitt Rivers), France and Germany before switching to the United States (Smithsonian). Amongst the nation foci Kuper inserts the different colonial, military or exploration campaigns that sourced many of the objects through trade, theft or military campaign. Many of the key figures are detailed, their origins, education and professional accomplishments. Much is tied to ideas of empire, what constitutes civilization and the still contentious ideas of evolution.
Kuper shows anthropology and ethnography to have had a deeply racist and controlling history, but it is the third section that is most impactful. Here, Kuper shows many of the contemporary notable cases such as the ownership of the Benin Bronzes or litigation for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Here Kuper especially emphasizes the issues of restitution in the face of records versus native expertise. It is for the evidence of the record that Kuper favors, as he too advocates for continuation of these institutions for the greater good of humanity.
Kuper asks and explains what constitutes ownership, the debate of what is 'art'? and the values of the objects to education and understanding of humanity.
A biased and meandering history that does ask some very important questions but stumbles on their answers.
Recommended for those exploring the history of anthropology or looking for sources exploring representation, free speech or working in or serving as a trustee of a museum.
I received a free digital version of this book via NetGalley thanks to the publisher.
June 26, 2025
This book has real potential to be really interesting, but in execution, it fails. I'll be honest, I disagree with Kuper on several of his conclusions, but I can appreciate that he is tackling contentious issues with no easy answers. He outlines the need for museums to change, and it would be interesting to read a discussion of how museums can be reimagined for the new age that recognises all the stakeholders.
The strongest part of the book is the first two sections that detail the history of museum development, but even here, there is a limit. In the introduction, Kuper details briefly the complexity of museum acquisition in the colonial period and does make a strong argument that all acquisitions in this time were coerced or violent, revoking the agency of the communities the objects were acquired. However, this is not explored in the main history of the book.
My main issue with the book is its execution, especially in the third section; large sections of the third section are about Kuper's personal opinions about specific museum exhibits, including complaining about the tone of an e-mail he received declining to let him use an image in his book. He mentions some of the more radical redesigns of museums but spends more time lingering on critiques of specific exhibits he personally disagrees with.
He wants museums to remain 'scientific' and not be driven by 'shamans and identity', but seems to not consider that there are experts about ethnic minority communities/former colonies who are part of those communities or that just being an expert does not make one free of bias. Most egregiously, he conflates museums engaging with different modalities of knowledge acquisition with Trump's 'alternative facts' (aka deliberately and consciously lying for political gain).
Overall, an interesting idea that is undermined by its tone of moaning about 'kids these days'.
The strongest part of the book is the first two sections that detail the history of museum development, but even here, there is a limit. In the introduction, Kuper details briefly the complexity of museum acquisition in the colonial period and does make a strong argument that all acquisitions in this time were coerced or violent, revoking the agency of the communities the objects were acquired. However, this is not explored in the main history of the book.
My main issue with the book is its execution, especially in the third section; large sections of the third section are about Kuper's personal opinions about specific museum exhibits, including complaining about the tone of an e-mail he received declining to let him use an image in his book. He mentions some of the more radical redesigns of museums but spends more time lingering on critiques of specific exhibits he personally disagrees with.
He wants museums to remain 'scientific' and not be driven by 'shamans and identity', but seems to not consider that there are experts about ethnic minority communities/former colonies who are part of those communities or that just being an expert does not make one free of bias. Most egregiously, he conflates museums engaging with different modalities of knowledge acquisition with Trump's 'alternative facts' (aka deliberately and consciously lying for political gain).
Overall, an interesting idea that is undermined by its tone of moaning about 'kids these days'.
May 1, 2024
We've all heard about formerly colonized people requesting the return of their artifacts from museums. This is not a simple request - there are many factors to be considered and I had never thought of most of them.
"The Museum of Other People" is the title the author gives to museums formerly known as museums of anthropolgy, or similar names. This is a very interesting history of how those museums evolved and why they are so problematic today. One example that comes up frequently are the famous Benin bronzes, from what is now Nigeria. Demands have been made for their return - even if they were purchased rather than looted. Ok. But who should they be returned to? Nigeria as a nation didn't exist when they were created. Should they go to a museum? Which one? One royal family of Nigeria is insisting they be returned to them personally. Is that fair? And, if they are returned, Nigeria's museums are notorious for their lack of good security. Musem robberies are very common. Are there items that are so important that they are a vital part of the history of the world and should be safeguarded by those best able to do that?
The author is very upset about the current state of these museums ("World Culture Museums" was one possible title I liked). He really dislikes the Smithsonian Museum of the American Indian, where each tribe was allowed to tell its own story. The result is apparently an unorganized, non-historic, non-scientific holdge podge of platitudes and PR messages. As a result, visitors are few and the ones who do go don't learn much of anything, according to the author.
There are far too many issues for me to summarize them all here, but if you have any interest in this topic at all, I'd highly recommend this book.
"The Museum of Other People" is the title the author gives to museums formerly known as museums of anthropolgy, or similar names. This is a very interesting history of how those museums evolved and why they are so problematic today. One example that comes up frequently are the famous Benin bronzes, from what is now Nigeria. Demands have been made for their return - even if they were purchased rather than looted. Ok. But who should they be returned to? Nigeria as a nation didn't exist when they were created. Should they go to a museum? Which one? One royal family of Nigeria is insisting they be returned to them personally. Is that fair? And, if they are returned, Nigeria's museums are notorious for their lack of good security. Musem robberies are very common. Are there items that are so important that they are a vital part of the history of the world and should be safeguarded by those best able to do that?
The author is very upset about the current state of these museums ("World Culture Museums" was one possible title I liked). He really dislikes the Smithsonian Museum of the American Indian, where each tribe was allowed to tell its own story. The result is apparently an unorganized, non-historic, non-scientific holdge podge of platitudes and PR messages. As a result, visitors are few and the ones who do go don't learn much of anything, according to the author.
There are far too many issues for me to summarize them all here, but if you have any interest in this topic at all, I'd highly recommend this book.
March 8, 2024
I enjoyed the interesting tales of history that shaped the creation of the museums, but they were often told in quite a disorganized fashion. This disorganization may be appropriate for the field of anthropology, as museums started with, "sprawling, poorly documented, incoherent assemblage(s)." However, there are points of interest contained in this disorganized work, especially when the author is not endlessly quoting others. Kuper has a great ability to ask the reader important questions and sometimes shares personal thoughts that bring some semblance of organization to a disorganized work. Importantly, the movement towards a unified "World Culture Museum" may someday be able to amplify this unity and organization, as "Every people has a particular message to deliver to the world which can enrich humanity and contribute its portion to beauty and the truth". If nothing else, this book provides the reader with a better understanding of museology and a deeper appreciation for those involved in this work.
August 6, 2024
The cover is compelling, the subject matter heavy. These were things that drew me to take this book off the shelf at my local Barnes & Noble. I was truly interested in the general subject, but found myself, like many other reviewers, wondering where the thesis was. What was the main idea? It felt like scattered essays on smaller subjects.
My takeaways? Museums are at a strange crossroads at this moment. It was very up to date with current events, but-- I will say the lack of a bibliography irritated me. With historical tomes like this, I tend to look in the bibliography for further reading upon a subject. There wasn't any. What a miss.
It was interesting in parts-- repetitive and sometimes a touch on the older ideas about race side.
Interesting read if you've got the time.
My takeaways? Museums are at a strange crossroads at this moment. It was very up to date with current events, but-- I will say the lack of a bibliography irritated me. With historical tomes like this, I tend to look in the bibliography for further reading upon a subject. There wasn't any. What a miss.
It was interesting in parts-- repetitive and sometimes a touch on the older ideas about race side.
Interesting read if you've got the time.
April 12, 2025
3.75/5
this book was basically my senior seminar "ethics and morality of archaeology" (yes im an anthropology grad) very dense that really only interests those with social sciences degrees.
sometimes it was odd because he kept going should the colonized people really have a say in their objects vs the scholars??? like yes. this is in fact what the younger generation in anthro/museum studies actually support. (so you can tell this was written by a very old white anthropologist)
anyways i liked most of it because duh i did study this and have an entire degree for it and have written dozens of papers on it
this book was basically my senior seminar "ethics and morality of archaeology" (yes im an anthropology grad) very dense that really only interests those with social sciences degrees.
sometimes it was odd because he kept going should the colonized people really have a say in their objects vs the scholars??? like yes. this is in fact what the younger generation in anthro/museum studies actually support. (so you can tell this was written by a very old white anthropologist)
anyways i liked most of it because duh i did study this and have an entire degree for it and have written dozens of papers on it
July 31, 2025
The first part of the book is informative (though very much a great white man history), outlining the rise of museums of other people. It can be hard to get through, with unnecessary details and rambling stories. The last third of the book shows the author’s inability to see outside of a colonial perspective. He presents information in a condescending way, disregarding any systems of knowledge that are not within the Western patterns he is used to. I learned from this book, though in a way that made me angry and frustrated at the author.
May 12, 2024
“The building of a museum is a never-ending work. A finished museum is a dead museum, and such a one must deteriorate and begin to lose usefulness from the time its growth stops.”
Never have I ever thought about the tenses on a museum placard . . . an honest overview of how the search of knowledge is also about power and influence and who controls the narrative, and we need to critically look the history of anthropology.
Never have I ever thought about the tenses on a museum placard . . . an honest overview of how the search of knowledge is also about power and influence and who controls the narrative, and we need to critically look the history of anthropology.
May 15, 2024
ตอนเเรกกะจะให้ 3 เเต่พอในบทท้ายๆ ผู้เขียนเสนอเเนะถึงการนิยามคำว่า พิพิธภัณฑ์ ในโลกปัจจุบัน ซึ่งเราชอบมาก บริบทของพิพิธภัณฑ์ควรเป็นไปใดทิศทางไหน? ควรจัดเเสดงของในรูปเเบบยังไง เพื่อจุดมุ่งหมายอะไร?
หนังสือเล่มนี้ทำให้เราเห็นพิพิธภัณฑ์ในฐานะอื่นๆ ที่ไม่ใช่เเค่สถานที่จัดเเสดง เเต่มันควรจะจัดเเสดงยังไง คุณค่าของพิพิธภัณฑ์มันทีค่ามากกว่าแค่สถานที่จัดเเสดงสิ่งของอดีต เเต่ใดๆหนังสือเเอบอ่านยาก เกือบตายอยู่
หนังสือเล่มนี้ทำให้เราเห็นพิพิธภัณฑ์ในฐานะอื่นๆ ที่ไม่ใช่เเค่สถานที่จัดเเสดง เเต่มันควรจะจัดเเสดงยังไง คุณค่าของพิพิธภัณฑ์มันทีค่ามากกว่าแค่สถานที่จัดเเสดงสิ่งของอดีต เเต่ใดๆหนังสือเเอบอ่านยาก เกือบตายอยู่
October 16, 2024
quite dense but an important history esp for those working for/with cultural museums and institutions. I probably would’ve stopped reading if I was not directly working in one of the main institutions targeted by the book but glad I saw it through (even though the author’s good intentions at times got lost in dated rhetoric)
March 3, 2024
This book is about how ethnographic museums evolved and asks about the purpose of ethnographic museums in the 21st century. It is quite historical in content, but written in a way that is truly enjoyable and entertaining.
Want to read
September 17, 2023LSE Book Reviews
October 24, 2023
A very interesting history of ethnographic/anthropology museums, from their origins to present times and the challeges they face today.
May 15, 2024
Interesting and thorough examination of anthropology and its presence in museums around Europe and the US throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
June 1, 2024
Kind of reads like a textbook, which made for a very long read. The second half was better than the first, but unlikely to recommend.
June 4, 2024
3.5 stars rounded up to 4
September 22, 2024
There’s an uneven discussion of Western proclivity for creating museums that deal with non-European peoples. The museums have a very selective array of artifacts and other materials that may give an inaccurate view of their culture of origin.
September 11, 2023
An invaluable book for specialists who study or work in museums and who want to actively engage with current issues, as well as for interested and concerned persons who would like to learn more about the subtleties and nuances that are often overlooked in the mainstream debate about modern museums. Some readers will no doubt view The Museum of Other People as a rearguard defence by a veteran anthropologist and dismiss Kuper’s polemic out-of-hand; but they would be wrong to do so, because this is a thoughtful, measured, and well-intentioned book which argues and evidences its calls for change in an accessible and informative manner. Kuper’s aim is to highlight that museums should function as cosmopolitan loci for sharing and thinking about human cultures to bridge past and present in ways which can help us to forge a better future together. In that respect alone, museums are indispensable social and historical assets for everyone.
I have written a longer review of this book for the LSE Review of Books which can be found here.
I have written a longer review of this book for the LSE Review of Books which can be found here.
Read
December 16, 2024Did not finish. Skimmed. The topic was interesting but the writing was very dry
Displaying 1 - 26 of 26 reviews