[These notes were made in 1983:]. I am not enamoured of this biography. I am enamoured of its subject, Dorothy Leigh Sayers, who has always struck me as being a woman of extraordinary intelligence and integrity. The title perhaps says it all - Hitchman is at her best when enumerating Sayers' external eccentricities. I disagreed violently with her assessment of the relative merits of the novels (how could anyone dislike Gaudy Night? Perhaps it took Hitchman aback to find a mystery novel with intellectual and emotional substance?) I would not therefore be surprised to find myself disagreeing with her when I come to the religious works - I have the highest respect for Sayers' Dante translation, and feel that it, in conjunction with another good translation (say Cary's), brings you as close as you're going to get to the original without having Italian. The pictures, too, are valuable - Sayers is surprisingly plain - perhaps because we all share her mental image of herself as Harriet Vane. But the writing itself was sloppy (and ill-typeset), the tone flip and thoughtless, in this particular biography, and tho' I am glad to have read it, I could have wished that the obviously extensive research it involved could have been more skilfully and sensitively used.
I am completely enamored of Dorothy L. Sayers and thoroughly enjoyed this biography which I believe was the first to be written after her death. The reader will catch many glimpses of the charming woman who was Dorothy L Sayers: her eccentricities, her scholarship, her personal Christian faith, and her genius in wielding a pen.
I read this about 50 years ago when it first appeared. I was about 15. As a big fan of her mystery novels, I was delighted to learn more about Dorothy L Sayers, and I enjoyed it a lot at the time. At least one piece of information surprised me very much.
I can't rate this biography based on that long ago reading and I haven't reread it since - maybe I will if I find it.
I remember being amused by the story of how she decided to translate Dante's Comedy. At the time I resolved to read her translation of it, but am only doing so now, in 2025! It's not my favorite translation, but she has great notes and commentary.
I'm sure later biographies by writers who had access to Sayers' letters, among other things, are more complete.
One book I enjoyed recently was Dorothy and Jack, about the friendship and correspondence between DLS and C S Lewis. It's by Gina Dalfonzo.
This is an enjoyable, informal biography of Dorothy L. Sayers. (Don't forget the L!) Written only 18 years after her death, I got the feeling that later biographers may have had a chance to gather more information about her life than this one included. The author was especially opinionated in her chapter about the Lord Peter Wimsey novels, giving her opinion of the quality of each one (also spoilers). This is a good introductory biography of Sayers, but I'm looking forward to investigating others and diving deeper into her life.
I really wanted to like this biography about Dorothy L. Sayers, mostly because Sayers herself has fascinated me for years. I found, however, Hitchman's writing style unsuitable for that of a biographer except of perhaps the Kitty Kelley ilk. She got some good "dirt" on Sayers, but dished it out in the style of a gossipmonger. For Sayers' first biography, I felt this was out of her league and even offensive...down to the title. Hitchman should have been a little less judgemental and more biographical in nature.
I wish I had not read this book. I would enjoy her mysteries much more if I had not read about Sayers' own life.
If, however, you do want to know something of how Sayers herself lived, this book tells you quite a lot. The occasional mocking/ridiculing tone disturbed me, though.
I admit I'm pleased with myself for finishing a biography--I read so few, I don't even have a tag for them!
I've read some Wimsey novels and a few quotes from her essays, and I wanted to get a sense of her life overall and her writing's major milestones (Dante is the tip of the iceberg!). The book is short and approachable. I'm sure that since it was published in 1975 a more definitive biography has arisen. As I was specifically looking for a broad overview, this one fit the bill, but there was sometimes a strange sense of the biographer minimizing Sayers. It assumes a majority of readers are Wimsey diehards, and I'm not sure whether the occasionally patronizing tone reveals a more prejudice against mystery writers or mystery readers.
Written in the underwhelming cadence of popular biographies of the time, this effort sparks a little interest in Sayers’ creation Lord Peter Whimsey but does little else.
The overwrought praise for Sayers’ art and actions as well as stippled life story smacks more of a Who’s Who entry than a book.
This writer quotes Sayers to excess, like a hastily rushed term paper. Part of this choice may be that Sayers was often reserved about her life story—however, the inferences and conclusions drawn from Sayer’s’ writings are rarely substantiated by first-hand accounts. Furthermore these accounts usually consist of a brief sketch of the author in question.
Although this book may have been meriting praise more than forty years ago, it is now incredibly forgettable.
I guess I’d much rather read a book by Dorothy L Sayers than a book about Dorothy L Sayers . Especially as I was not prepared for her anti-Semitism, or that of the author’s.
Also I would have liked to read more about the Inklings.
An interesting take on "biography." I think it is apt to call it "an introduction" as it isn't really a biography but it is a helpful bit of context on a writer I didn't know much about before.
This biography of Sayers comes from the New English Library, the same company who published her Lord Peter Wimsey detective stories. The back cover describes the Sayers as "prey to romantic yearnings that culminated in pregnancy and the secret birth of an illegitimate son" and her husband as "a work shy compulsive fantasist" and so on - hyperbole which would make any serious biographer cringe. Someone has written in this worn library copy, that "this should be serialised in the Woman's Day" and it would have been, had it lived up to the bombast of its blurb! Luckily, the author stays away from the language of expose.
In a very measured introduction, Hitchman, who made a documentary about Wimsey in the early seventies, describes a certain reticence to take on the biography, both out of an awe for Sayers' work and respect for her wishes that no attempt be made until 50 years after her death. (This book was published in 1975, 17 years after Sayers' passing).
Hitch takes the narrative approach and has a bright, entertaining style. Briefly, Sayers was born in Oxford in 1893 to a clergyman father, who moved the family to Bluntisham in the Fens when Sayers was four. Sayers was educated by her father and by governesses before being sent to a girls' boarding school at age 16. She won a scholarship to Oxford and attended Somerville College, taking out a first class degree in French. Sayers taught at a girls' school, edited for Blackwell's, and had a short stint in France before returning to England and taking up a position as a copywriter. Sayers spent almost a decade in advertising and wrote many of the Wimsey novels while working at Benson's advertising agency. Sayers gave birth to a son, John Anthony, in early 1924 and she gave him to her cousin to raise. In 1926, Sayers married Arthur Fleming and they "adopted" John Anthony, even though he never lived with the couple and none of Sayers' friends knew he was her biological offspring until after Sayers' death. In the second half of her life, Sayers was actively involved in broadcasting, penned a series of radio plays, and a couple of stage plays. She also became a vocal Christian apologist and essayist before turning her hand to translating Dante's Divine Comedy in 1944. Sayers died just before Christmas 1957, leaving the translation incomplete.
Hitchman (1975) probably gives the best overview of them all. It is also the shortest, easiest and most entertaining to read. The major flaw is that Hitchman comes at Sayers from the point of view of someone who's read all of the Wimsey novels and who doesn't shy away from giving away the plot and who gives both specific and negative commentary on each of the books unasked.
"Many girls, normal girls not inclined in the least to lesbianism, go through a period of hating themselves for being women, and adopt boyish habits to gain attention. This usually occurs around thirteen to sixteen years, and the wise parent will just ride out the storm." (p28)
"There is nothing more ridiculous than a plain, intense woman throwing herself at an uninterested man". (p44)
Mystery writer Dorothy L. Sayers was a character, and this brief biography captures her personality quite well. However, the biographer really never digs into the meat of Sayers' relationships. Instead the reader is left with an entire chapter on Sayers' struggles with production of a BBC radio play about the life of Jesus and other less than fascinating travails. That said, this biography is well written and worth reading if you (as I am) are a big fan of the author.
Only partly read this book. I want to discover the characters Dorothy L. Sayers writes about on my own without having it coloured by someone else. I guess this book would be more interesting for those who have read Sayers book. For those who have developed a relationship with Sayers' characters this book might make more sense. As it was I lost interest. Maybe I'll read it again in full some other time.
I knew nothing about Sayers beforehand and this was a decent introduction to her life. Of course, I'm mostly interested in the Wimsey novels and not at all in the religious writings that Sayers wrote later, so I kind of skimmed those parts. Hitchman had sort of a weirdly dismissive attitude toward Sayers in certain sections. And she totally disses Gaudy Night, which seemed very wrong to me - I think that's my *favorite*.
This is a horror of a biography, but it was helpful in cracking the mystery of DLS illegitimate son. And it is aninteresting read for anyone who has read Sayers. I am not entirely sure that the author ever read a book written by Sayers.