"Are we alone?"
It's a cliche, but it is, without a doubt, one of the most profound questions human beings have ever pondered. If the contents of this book are to be believed (and Congress seems to think so), Lue Elizondo could be the catalyst to disclosure. That would make this possibly *the most* consequential book ever published.
First, some context...
In 2017, Lue Elizondo released three videos showing military interactions with UAP that appear to defy the laws of physics as we know them. The evidence was so unprecedented that it resulted in historic, detailed coverage in the New York Times -- only after Elizondo was rigorously vetted and his credentials painstakingly confirmed.
Since that time, there have been congressional hearings featuring first-hand witnesses to these cases and an additional whistleblower named David Grusch who testified *under oath* that the U.S. military and/or particular contractors are in possession of such craft *and* non-human occupants (NHI) at known locations.
Former head of NOAA, Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet has since confirmed the presence of NHI in numerous interviews. And this May, Aerospace Executive Colonel Karl Nell speaking at the Salt conference added "there's zero doubt." He paused briefly to stare down the gasping audience. "Non-human intelligence exists. Non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity. This interaction is not new. And it's been ongoing. And there are unelected people in the government that are aware of that."
After a detailed but ongoing investigation, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community was able to confirm that some of the claims made by Grusch are "urgent and credible." The evidence has been so convincing to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle that unprecedented UAP legislation has since been signed into law. More UAP bills and hearings are pretty unanimously confirmed to be in the works. Many additional whistleblowers have apparently come forward, but their identities are not yet known to the general public.
Since 2017, Elizondo has been very conservative about what he knows. This book, which had to pass DOPSR review by the Department of Defense (with visible redactions included in the book), expands on what he knows in profound ways that echo the sensational claims made by David Grusch.
As Carl Sagan famously said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Claims of NHI are definitely extraordinary and have a high burden of proof. The nature of the phenomenon inherently prevents definitive confirmation of origin. The only way to satisfy the burden of proof is to obtain the craft and bodies. Thanks to Lue Elizondo, whistleblowers are naming names and locations to Congress. It may take legislation using eminent domain to confiscate the material. Only then will we know for sure.
Personally, I have always enjoyed spooky subjects. However, I am also an atheist, a huge science enthusiast and extremely skeptical (and harshly critical) of conspiracy theories. When I read such topics, I treat them as fiction and read for entertainment purposes only. This subject is a rare exception, and this book is absolutely not a work of fiction.
That said, there are still a number of claims made in this book that I can't accept at face value. However, these are generally framed appropriately and are not fundamental to the core evidence. For those reasons, I could not justify removing a star, particularly given the magnitude of the broader, more robust revelations. I will discuss those topics towards the end of this review.
***From here on out I will be spoiling many of the key revelations for discussion.***
Elizondo specifically chose the go-fast, gimbal and tic-tac videos because he thought their *low quality* would facilitate declassification. That implies that higher quality visual evidence exists in government files. Indeed, he has explicitly confirmed that to be the case in interviews since the books release, including in his interview with Joe Rogan.
Moreover, he did not believe he would be able to obtain an unlimited declassification. For this reason, he requested a limited declassification for research purposes. However, due to a technicality the DoD advised in their response that it would have to be a general unlimited release -- presumably trusting that Elizondo would still be using the declassification for research purposes only, but not legally restricting a general release. He took full advantage.
The fact that these videos represent some of the *less definitive evidence* in government files is pretty significant. Some important notes about the tic-tac and gimbal encounters before I dive into the more controversial revelations.
Tic-Tac:
1. Prior to the tic-tac encounter, "hundreds" of UAP had been tracked in the area dropping from 80,000 feet (bordeline space) down to about 50 feet and back up "in the fraction of a second." Impossible speed.
2. The 46 foot long white "tic-tac" was first sighted by pilots above the surface of the water that appeared to be "churning" and "roiling" while moving in an odd manner "unlike anything anyone had ever seen."
3. After a close pass, the tic-tac zoomed off to the horizon at an impossible speed. Seconds later, the radar operator advised, "You're not going to believe this, Commander. Whatever that thing is, it's at your CAP point!" 60 miles away! The combat air patrol point is "a designated point that is preloaded into the aircraft and is used as a meeting point... Few people know the location... [and] it is impossible to extract from aircraft systems."
4. The power estimated to produce the kind of propulsion in the tic-tac case is 1.1 trillion watts -- 100 times the daily power generation of the entire US. It is not stated how this figure was determined.
5. It was traveling at hypersonic velocities without producing a sonic boom. As Elizondo describes later in the book, hypersonic means Mach 5. Or 5 times the speed of sound (762 mph). We only know of a few aircraft that approach Mach 5. The famous SR-71 can just about reach Mach 5, but only at very high altitudes where the air is thinner. "UAP are routinely clocked at *Mach 17*... more than 13,000 mph at low altitudes" without generating sonic booms.
6. Speaking of the SR-71, it takes half the state of Ohio to make a right angle turn. These objects stop, start and change directions at sharp angles without any resistance. The human body can only withstand about 9 g's for a couple seconds before passing out. The robust, highly maneuverable F-16 can resist 17 g's before literally disintegrating. These objects handle *thousands* of g's without any problem.
Gimbal:
1. We only see one object on the video. However, the "profanity-laced banter" on the audio makes clear that it was not alone. "Look, there's a whole fleet of them! Look on the [radar]."
2. The object resembles a classic flying saucer in appearance with a halo effect (if you look closely) that is explained in a separate chapter speculating about propulsion that may also affect the quality of camera photos. The gimbal UFO is also featured on the book cover.
3. The object "parks itself in the air" and rotates. "'Look at that thing!' a pilot says. 'It's rotating!'" Earlier in the video, before it "parked" itself, someone points out, "They're all going against the wind! The wind is 120 knots!" That's 138 mph winds, which would be classified as a *Category 4 hurricane* at ground level. These objects traveled against those hurricane force winds and at least one hovered and rotated in one spot without losing altitude at about 20,000 feet!
Again. These videos were selected for declassification because they were among the *lower quality* options! Astounding!
Now we get into the more startling revelations...
Roswell
Elizondo was informed by Dr. Hal Puthoff that Roswell was indeed a crash of two non-human vehicles. The hypothesis is that an electromagnetic pulse from a nearby base inadvertently disrupted the propulsion systems of the craft and caused them to crash.
Biological Remains
This is the shortest chapter in the book and provides only one example, but it is still a lot to unpack. Elizondo does not mention if this is the only example. He also lists a few crashes, but once again chooses not to refer to his list as being complete. Grusch has claimed that crashes are in the double digits.
The autopsy information was shared with Elizondo by "senior officials" about one of his colleagues at the CIA who reviewed a classified report about an autopsy that was performed on a deceased non-human pilot. Elizondo seems to have confirmed with that colleague who did not want his name used. Elizondo does *not* mention reviewing the report or seeing the body first-hand.
The alleged non-human pilot had a smooth brain, which would normally suggest low intelligence. That would be perplexing, if true. It also allegedly had a three chambered heart (like a reptile) and a merged gut and liver.
It seems highly improbable that a species that evolved completely independently would have similar internal organs. However, scientists have studied instances of "convergent evolution" here on earth. These are cases in which traits, organs or appendages evolve completely independently between distinct, isolated organisms. But I think it's a stretch in this instance.
If the report is true and accurate, the more likely explanation would seem to be hybridization, which would require that DNA be a ubiquitous building block for life throughout the universe. Hybridization would pose so many additional problems and questions. The "cryptoterrestrial" hypothesis (that they evolved on earth) is also probably more likely than convergent evolution on another planet, but why the complete absence of archeological evidence?
Elizondo has his own views on the smooth brain finding, which he dismisses as anthropogenic bias. He also very briefly and casually mentions the possibility that the pilot was a biological robot created by a higher race. For this he mentions that *civilian* researchers have frequently hypothesized that the "nordics" created the servile greys. However, he is quick to say that he doesn’t put much stock in such speculation. Although, it is interesting that he briefly pivots to hierarchies in nature such as bee and ant colonies.
It goes without saying that alien abductions are extremely controversial. However, if this autopsy claim is true and accurate, abduction research *may* be able to shed light on the strange biology. To extract useful information with such a dubious method of memory recall as hypnosis, it is imperative to favor researchers with large sample sizes, strict methodologies and minimal New Age or religious preconceptions. For those reasons, we should probably look to Budd Hopkins and Dr. David M. Jacobs who were among the earliest researchers in the field with by far the largest sample sizes and no clear preconceptions beyond taking UFOs seriously.
A quick word about hypnosis. On the one hand, there is a famous court case in which a witness was able to remember a license plate number with the aid of hypnosis, among other examples. Even Myth Busters found it to be useful (to their surprise) for remembering additional details of a staged event. This is not too surprising given that hypnosis simply creates a state of deep relaxation seemingly conducive to improved recall. Also, it is worth noting that stage hypnosist demonstrations are largely fake. It doesn't have that kind of power.
However, hypnosis has proven pretty unreliable in most controlled studies. It significantly heightens suggestibility and the potential for confabulation leading to false memories. If it works at all in the case of abductions for some reason, a strict methodology is absolutely crucial.
David Jacobs has long posited that the "nordics" appear to be nothing more than late stage hybrids who are subservient, but also later hypothesized that the small greys may be (early stage) intermediaries as well. The tall "praying mantis" type is the one that consistently conveys authority.
If we assume the autopsy report to be true, it could be the case that the greys really are cognitively dim -- created to be just smart enough to follow strict orders and perform required tasks, while being better equipped biologically to handle earthly conditions, but too dumb to develop independent thought.
The only thing mainstream science has been able to confirm in agreement with abduction researchers is that abductees broadly do not appear to be mentally ill, and they represent a seemingly random cross-section of our society spanning all walks of life, cultures and ethnicities (a sign of a sound scientific survey of a population, hypothetically speaking). However, elsewhere in the book, Lue Elizondo references a very informal survey of alleged abductees conducted by Garry Nolan who found that abductees appear to have higher IQ scores than the control group -- and an enlarged part of the brain that we know very little about called the caudate-putamen. Very preliminary.
If abduction research is of any value at all it is worth going back to the earliest literature when hypnosis was administered by skeptical mental health professionals, such as in the Betty and Barney Hill case. Budd Hopkins' first book "Missing Time" relied on mental health professionals to conduct hypnotic regressions on a variety of alleged abductees who did not know each other. Many did not know they were abductees (or what that would even entail) prior to regression. David Jacobs also went to great lengths to avoid confabulation, spent a lot of time writing about methodology and criticized other researchers with poor methodology in his book "The Threat" -- including the famous Dr. John Mack of Harvard University.
For anyone interested in dabbling in the very fringe topic of abductions, I would recommend starting with "Missing Time" by Budd Hopkins. Then read "The Threat" by David Jacobs. The details were still very hazy when "Missing Time" was written, which makes the work less contaminated by pop culture. By the time "The Threat" was published, patterns of apparent hybridization came into greater focus, and there is a lot of useful constructive criticism on methodology.
Alien Implants
Lue Elizondo *may* not have witnessed bodies or craft first hand, but he does claim to have handled an "alleged alien implant" that was removed from a military servicemember after a UAP encounter.
Elizondo was informed of instances in which a suspected implant seemed to evade attempts at extraction, and continued to move slightly for a short period of time while under a microscope.
The metallic "implant" is typically encapsulated within the host's own living tissue, presumably to prevent the body from rejecting it. Brightly colored fibers were commonly noted that were compared to Morgellons fibers and move under their own power. They suspected it had its own metabolism, and drew energy from the host's body.
Elizondo claims alleged implants have been sent to the CDC, FDA, NIH and US Army research facility at Fort Dietrich in Maryland.
UAP "Honeypot" -- Project Interloper
Lue Elizondo describes a plan he helped create to capture UAP. It leveraged UAP interest in nukes, open water and military activity. It would have required a lot of resources to lure UAP and "trap" them with "classified" (EMP?) equipment. Elizondo was not able to get authorization to complete the experiment.
Various Other Controversial Claims
The "hitchhiker" effect receives some attention. Elizondo believes that he "brought something home" with him. Both he and his wife witnessed green, translucent orbs in their home that would come and go. No real basis for judging these anecdotes.
The angel theory is covered a little bit. Elizondo thankfully expresses skepticism. However, there is a faction of religious extremists in the Pentagon who believe UAP are demonic. This is the "Collins Elite." Likely the same group that shook up Tucker Carlson. One likely member attempted to dissuade Elizondo from looking into UAP.
Remote viewing gets a decent amount of attention as well. This is another subject that overlaps with Garry Nolan's research on the caudate-putamen. Elizondo has personal experience and believes that remote viewing works. I can't accept it at face value as it has failed independent experiments. My view is that we can fool ourselves with the *ambiguity* of astrology and palm readings in the same way.
I'm open to being wrong, but I need to see the evidence demonstrated independently with a statistically significant success rate. Even if abduction claims are true, it would be more likely to assume that telepathic communication etc. are the product of advanced technology. As Arthur C. Clarke famously said, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
There is also a weird connection with cherokee blood, but there is a good article on "bunkhistory.org" that could explain that surprising finding. The short answer is that it became popular in the mid-1800s to claim cherokee descent.
Various Final Thoughts
We should be vigilant about disinformation. In UFO history, there have been no shortage of credentialed "whistleblowers" who have proven to be liars and charlatans. Former counter intelligence office Richard Doty has made a second career out of lying and pedaling hoaxes.
That said, despite some petty nitpicking, Lue Elizondo is very clearly who he says he is. The jaw dropping visual evidence he declassified has brought out direct eye witnesses, and his efforts have put a massive congressional microscope on special access programs. If the NHI angle is an act of counter intelligence it might be the worst of all-time. That hypothesis is more absurd than alien implants and hybridization.
Some might be disappointed that there was very little discussion of ancient alien theories. Personally, I've never found the evidence particularly compelling.
There is an entire chapter dealing with a speculative analysis of the potential propulsion system. Audible listeners also receive a pdf for the illustrations in this chapter. Very cool.
The appendix includes scans of several important documents and emails pertinent to Lue Elizondo's story and credibility, including a letter from the late Senate leader Harry Reid vouching for Elizondo's participation in AATIP.
If you're a beginner, for additional reading, I highly recommend Leslie Kean's book "UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record." It covers a number of the best cases on record in an exceptionally objective manner. Kean was partly responsible for the NYT piece on Elizondo and the release of the videos. I also recommend "UFOs and Nukes" by Robert Hastings and, of course, "UFOs and the National Security State" by Richard Dolan if you want a comprehensive history.
Conclusion
Thanks in part to the heroic efforts of Lue Elizondo, for the first time in history, Congress has bought in to disclosure efforts. With significant, sustained pressure, it may be possible to pry the alleged "extraordinary evidence" out from the ossified military industrial complex. *If* that happens, this book will be referenced by historians for centuries as the pivotal moment that forever changed our trajectory as a species.