All three-dimensional objects can be experienced in two it just takes some careful unpicking of the seams. Witty, comic, plaintive, touching, acerbic, droll, cavalier, caffeinated, irreverent, Austerities, the mind-altering substantial debut from Sam Riviere, seems to achieve the impossible in being all things at once. Initially conceived as a response to the 'austerity measures' implemented by the coalition government in 2011, the poems quickly began taking on a life in 'cutting' themselves on levels of sentiment, structure and even subject matter. Not content to merely build a series of freethinking poems, these remarkable pieces seem eagerly and mischievously to analyze their moment of creation, then weigh their worth, then consign their excess to the recycling bin thereafter. Experience is speedy, the poems seem to say, so dizzyingly fast that the poetry will inevitably be running to catch up - often arriving at a scene the moment after the moment has gone. The effect is as funny and it is startling, beguiling as it is surprising, and makes Austerities a vivid reminder that deprivation, as Leonard Cohen put it, can be the mother of poetry.
A lot of people seem to like this collection so I feel kind of bad about hating it, but it came across as a young, sexually frustrated boy who read some poetry and thought he'd have a go, I don't know if Riviere is trying to be edgy or what but frankly it made me cringe.
Very contemporary, spiky and often acerbic poems. Snarky, sneering, up to the moment, and with the wit and intelligence to back up the aforementioned qualities.
Alright, but a slight letdown. Sam Riviere is an interesting poet—his metaphors, at the smallest level, are smart, his humour is cheeky, his concern with originality and ownership exciting—but his poems risk being merely interesting. I think I get there are games being played: the titles never really match the poems; one of the poems is about the arbitrariness of title selection; the titles of the poems in his follow-up collection, Kim Kardashian's Marriage, are all the possible permutations of the section headings in this collection; the footnotes, in an exaggeration of Eliot's for the Wasteland, also fail to properly correspond or comment, and are designed to send you on a wild goose chase. When he's good, he's really quite good, and these games invite you in, if not to win then at least to play. But the collection is also in this precarious position of being predicated on existing in a kind of post/modern literary aftermath—sincerity, meaning, truth have all atrophied under austerity measures—while being read, ever increasingly, in times after the aftermath, while a few fresh crucial meanings have continued to manifest, somewhere, somehow.
I think of Selima Hill, an English poet who I consider avant-garde in her own right, one who maybe is more interested in character study than (very!) oblique social critique, but who uses vignette, collage and an eye to the gestalt in a more incisive, less fidgety way. Sometimes his mistrust of master-narratives, his suspicion towards the sovereignty of sincerity, is laid on way too thick, so you're paying far more attention to his "Playing of a Game" than getting involved in playing. Some poems about porn are mordant exhibitions of defunct human connection; others are just embarrassing to watch. Is it naive to have wanted more poems *about* austerity, and fewer about boobs? Or at least for the connection for the two to be a little plainer, something I'm sure Hill could achieve. As always with poetry you have to wonder—is that perhaps the point? Do all my complaints boil down to me being dense? Time will tell.
really like these, i like how the the turn of his phrases, images that are beautiful but are never trite, each feels whole in and of themselves, like a dream sequence
they were all interesting but the ones i liked best were the ones speaking about a relationship/another person, felt like i could strongly relate to those
this is my favourite one
NO TOUCHING
I would like to ruin your life let it not be said I lack the necessary imagination to be jealous I would ask you to tell no-one about us and if you tell no-one about us I’ll fight hard to hide my disappointment I would like you to renounce your past as quite a big mistake it will mean something although I will never completely forgive you I think you represent the possibility in my life of renewal I would like people to say “she came back a different person” we will appear at the weddings of people we don’t care about our faces radiant from fucking
Hipster rubbish. I'm afraid this book had a tough act to follow considering I read it after Morgan Parker and Ocean Vuong, so perhaps that was a bit unfair. There were some lines I thought were godo and funny is this but all in all I wasn't feeling that flat dead affect of this. Quite frankly, I don't think this has aged well at all (it was published in 2012, with the 'rise' of Twitter poetry or whatever; who gives a shit). The poems about porn have ESPECIALLY not aged well (they're not ironic or, like, revealing the deadness of the modern age, they're just.... gross and creepy). The last poem has a line that goes "you were looking cute in blue jeans to be fair you weren't actually that pretty" - RUDE! And yeah, OBVIOUSLY you can have a narrator in poetry who is a bit of a dick (and maybe that was the point), but i was just like eeew, I don't like spending time with you, I'm so glad this book is over. When I read poetry I always feel like I'm encountering a certain kind of energy or presence and this was just not an energy or presence I enjoyed. The style and the content overall (ermagerd the Internet is bad for us) unfortunately felt dated to me, which sadly is something that just happens to certain works (like "The Graduate" movie).
I did like some lines, though:
- "I would like to ruin your life"
- "peeling your jeans off each leg is like skinning a leek"
- "I didn't know pool players were so into plaid"
- "here I am in a wet field as a clown tells me to 'get real'" (I love this! I don't think he means, like, an actual circus clown, but that's definitely what I pictured)
- "Are the wires coming out of your head attached to a lie detector or an mp3 player" (see what I mean? Who has mp3 players anymore? Lol!)
It never ceases to astonish or offend me seeing the couples circulate the otherwise dead town centre like leaves in a big ashtray in a sort of drugged calm they’re dreamy I guess linked limply they don’t see where the other looks & the sun doesn’t bother to lift its head from the table but is leaking torpid ‘honeyed’ light from behind clouds imagine it living for years and years with the same person (p. 16)
The Mysterious Lives of the Stars
I want something what is it those little boobies from 1964 in the Willy Ronis exhibition in something like somebody’s new raspberry sweater I don’t wear sunglasses though I like opacity I like that you can’t see my expression as I’m sitting writing this in my favourite T shirt the one with the retro pin-up girl listening to a black telephone on it & with yellow armpits like Rimbaud bless the powers that have taken our grievances away from us (p. 18)
Dream Poem
I know what you’re thinking it’s dull unless they’re sex dreams dreams about violent murders mine are pretty banal I dreamed I wrote a poem beginning ‘Hi!’ and ending ‘See You Later!’ the middle part was amazing that’s the part I don’t remember I was sitting on a platform high above the jungle this all feels really familiar probably from something I’ve seen on TV I was dressed up as a witch doctor and used this stick of judgement taking back the names of creatures restoring them to myth I was doing wisely with it in my dream the poem didn’t have this assonance that’s creeping in after I’d taken back everything I kept hold of my stick using it to designate the categories that really matter while adding bones and wings to my hat sitting up here out of danger I hate this / I like that (p. 22)
’94
what an amazing year so many great albums look it up for yourself I’d get nostalgic but unfortunately no one around here could care too much about the 90s meanwhile you were what 6 how does that make you feel it’s really hard to tell now you are linked to ~10000 images it’s funny in my fantasies I’m the one who dies you stay here looking as always excellent in black (p. 30)
No Touching
I would like to ruin your life let it not be said I lack the necessary imagination to be jealous I would ask you to tell no one about us and if you tell no one about us I’ll fight hard to hide my disappointment I would like you to renounce your past as quite a big mistake it will mean something although I will never completely forgive you I think you represent the possibility in my life of renewal I would like people to say ‘she came back a different person’ we will appear at the weddings of people we don’t care about our faces radiant from fucking (p. 32)
Loosely Spiritual American Poetry
VS. tensely materialistic british poetry VS. tireless love poetry of eager administrators VS. tiring political poetry of benefit fraudsters VS. improvised poetry of nomadic herdsmen VS. impoverished poetry of the fully funded VS. lavish poetry of taciturn janitors VS. motionless poetry of sociable professors VS. poetry spoken to an empty playground VS. poetry learnt by drunk waitresses VS. poetry that has not been written VS. poetry that will never be written I.E. poetry of the hot textual object VS. poetry evocative yes but *of what* (p. 34)
Actual Evil
naked french girls smoking weed naked ecuadorian girls drinking cherryade naked dutch girls watching philip seymour hoffman dvd no naked french girls smoking weed (p. 35)
I’m a Buddhist This is Enlightenment
I hate when life like an autobahn explains itself also when the news presenters share a little joke alluding to the private world of showbiz bullshit so Giles had to say ‘I can’t relate to this’ I liked when Aki whispered something in the pool hall that remains unknown to most of the universe and then ‘what I just said I’ll never say again’ O I’m trying very hard to remember a word with ‘I’ and ‘O’ in it a good amount of mystery for a Saturday like meeting a really cute couple or when words touch each other in strange places like drinking & biography or sex & cheesecake if I test each object on my desk with heat under my hand with heat the right one will reply (p. 40)
Heavily
Today is a day of zero connectivity I brush my teeth and dunk my face in water which is what you wash your breasts with I want to use the exact same soap and drink orange juice probably from Spain now there is a gelid light in the kitchen & outside the same air we all have to breathe the day is in some kind of tank all I will do is think of increasingly horrible things to tell you striking the side of my head for a new image there is no competing with the spectacular & obvious am I not a child at the opera of emotions (p. 41)
The Prince
let a man sit down I’m in telesales me would you buy off this voice on a phone what do they call you Sarah Sarah Sarah do you find me attractive Sarah I don’t mind if you don’t I’m a bit tipsy I’m celebrating maybe I’ll tell you if we get to know each other better Sarah you’re beautiful you know never let a man tell you otherwise right don’t be that way nice girls Sarah who’s your friend Melanie where you from how old are you woo is it true when I get you home are you going to let me spank it I’m going to spank it I’m going to hold that caramel cheek in my palm I’m coming round soon later I love you baby you think I can’t hear all that soft boy shit let her know what youre going to do she don’t want you she wants me she don’t want you she wants me you may as well delete my number you had your chance today and blew it it’s Geoffrey Geoffrey with a J (p. 42)
Regular Black
Who wouldn’t rather be watching a film about werewolves instead of composing friends’ funeral playlists all day I’ve been suspecting something like must the 1st thought always be ‘slipping out of her brassiere’ or ‘slipping out of her brassiere’ that nobody calls anyone a LIAR anymore and who misses that unambiguousness that the word ‘image’ has for a long time been inadequate that back then nobody went invisible among their references that the silence of the looking glass was total that pizzas were delivered through the evening that nobody’s left eye wept continuously that one’s ambitions were solely amorous also tonight would have been perfect weather to take your girlfriend out for ice-cream needless to say she remembers it differently the 2nd thought is is it possible she’s doing it on purpose and love back then love was a papercut (p. 51)
POV
All day I have been watching women crush ripe tomatoes in their cleavage whatever you can think of someone’s already done it there’s a new kind of content pre-empting individual perversions I’ve seen my missing girlfriend’s face emerge cresting from a wave of pixels I sleep with a [rec] light at the foot of my bed all the film crews have been infiltrated by militant anti-pornographers sometimes in surfaces there is a dark ellipse it’s the cameraman’s reflection (p. 57)
Fall in Love All Over Again
much against everyone’s advice I have decided to live the life I want to read about and write it not by visiting the graves of authors or moving to london to hear in my sleep its gothic lullaby not by going for coastal walks or being from the north and lathing every line as an approach it’s way outmoded I run a bath turn off the lights I think only of lathering the pale arms of my wife for now a girl who dreads weekends then I guess I might as well teach squandering so as not to squander this marvellous opportunity right? (p. 68)
Miserable I Hope You Do Too
a face becomes more beautiful as it says it doesn’t want to be with you the cemetery has trees like the memory of fires this isn’t really *like* anything actually sorry there’s the rest of the year to think about it to become trees or fires or whatever they are we documented the whole thing remember that’s what we were doing or didn’t you notice I don’t want to know which of us wrote it it’s like asking who engraved the gravestones you’re literary why don’t you *read* them guess I can’t believe anyone’d want to keep every note & I thought I would be glad you called but I’m kind of not (p. 82)
Hey Perverts
if I know you and I thiiink I do I think I know the kinds of things you like like putting the heating up full & walking round in your shorts with the windows open like buying organic mince & flushing it straight down the toilet as soon as you get in like searching for stunt deaths & funfair accidents like deliberately changing your mind like walking a metre behind someone on their way home at night like photographing every item of clothing you own like sitting in pubs alone putting out creepy vibes like saying ‘bad dog’ to a good dog like making up stuff for your counselling session & different stuff for your parents like wasting x2 an unethical lunch like saying you haven’t seen the movie when you have & studying my reactions as we watch it like me telling you this stuff especially that like busying yourself with your web of lies if this is’t enough which it obviously isn’t then I have something here extremely interesting isn’t it yesterday’s horoscope which we can test rigorously for accuracy here’s where each thing finds its hollow place (p. 106)
I think I'm going to decide not to rate poetry or short story collections any more because what does a rating mean when there is so much diversity between two covers? I suppose it's my assessment of the quality of the compilation? Anyway, I don't feel qualified to rate this collection.
The whole volume reminded me of that part in Fight Club where Brad Pitt asks Edward Norton "How's that working out for you, being clever?"
I learned a lot about poetry.
I read it for an hour on the train and felt completely detached from reality when I got off.
I 'enjoyed' some of the poems, I 'appreciated' many, a few I didn't get.
These poems were fun to read. More often than not, there was a line or an image that inspired an idea, made me crack a smile, or just got a nod of appreciation. I didn't read this as closely as I sometimes read poetry, but I think the style of poems invite that.
"you do not need to shout / a poem that is pretty much / the definition of a poem"
Young, witty and often profound. A poetry collection that combines everyday observations with a feeling of loss and puzzlement. One to dip into again and again.
«funny, ok, but have we had enough about poetry? I mean it will amuse other students of poetry but, to adopt a voice I didn't know I possessed, I doubt it means jackshit out there»
I LIKED RIVIERE'S novel, Dead Souls, so much that I decided to try his poetry, which turns out to be "interesting," as we say when we think something might be important but don't want to risk declaring that we like it.
81 Austerities contains, as you might have guessed, eighty-one poems, all originally published on Riviere's blog in 2011, at a moment when the British government was adopting "austerity measures," that is, raising taxes and cutting public services.
The eighty-one poems leave the impression of practicing certain austerities themselves, as they are generally brief (only a few require more than one page) and largely do without upper-case letters and punctuation marks.
The no-caps, no-punctuation style, the brevity, and the syntactic plainness of the poems ("I was watching TV / with the windows open / it was a warm night"), combined with their first appearing in a digital medium makes a reader think of Instagram poetry, but in many a wink to the reader Riviere reveals he is cannier than that. For instance, there is a poem at the very end titled "81 Austerities" that seems to consist of quick comments on the other poems in the volume.
I found myself thinking instead of Chelsey Minnis. Minnis's poems, too, seem superficially like the kind of poem you would find in an intelligent but anxious teen's journal or social media account. Often enough, though, they seem to be deliberately trying to sound like that, a poetic knuckleball wobbling its way past you for a strike. Is this poem the pathetic little squib it looks like at first glance or is it...important?
But what in the world makes a poem important? Should we refrain thinking of importance, however defined, as the right goal for a poem?
I am also reading Michael Hamburger's translations of Holderlin currently, and I wonder if Riviere and Minnis are programmatically renouncing ambition.
Holderlin lies behind Heidegger's exalted idea of poetry as the Un-Concealing of Being, as the basis of all art, as the basis of history...you name it. For Heidegger, poetry is where the big meanings are. But what if going for the Big Meanings opens the door to the political commitments for which Heidegger is so (rightly) notorious? Is ambitious poetry complicit with horror? (Pound, for instance).
This in turns reminds me of a passage in "A Sunset," which Robert Hass recently published in the New Yorker.
This may be where John Ashbery would introduce a non sequitur, Not from aversion to responsibility But from a sense he no doubt had That there was a kind of self-importance In the introduction of morality to poetry And that one might, therefore, be better off Practicing one’s art in more or less The spirit of the poor juggler in the story Of Christmas who, having no gift to bring To the infant god, crept into the church In the night and faced the crèche and juggled.
Ashbery steers as far as he can from sounding like a vates, to be sure. Paul Celan and Samuel Beckett also could be said to be trying to tack as hard as they could away from the poetic course celebrated by Heidegger. So I wonder if Riviere and Minnis are looking for ways to write poetry without being Poets.
"you are the palest goth at the picnic": on Sunday I read Sam Riviere's debut poetry collection '81 Austerities', at last! (The timing seemed good, as I was on my way to Edinburgh Fringe to see, among other shows, an opera titled 'The Marriage Of Kim K', which I partly wanted to see because the title reminded me of Riviere's collection 'Kim Kardashian's Marriage'.) Anyway, '81 Austerities' is really quite beautiful; each poem is a blessing and the overall concept and the form of the collection made for a very engaging reading experience. Of course, it is easily superseded by the sophomore 'Kim Kardashian's Marriage'!
sometimes you read a book and want to write somthing catty then remember the author probably does check the goodreads, because i would. ah well, i wish him well and i heard 'dead souls' was very good.
I'm an big fan of this one I do enjoy seeing the disgust people react to SR with. I'm not surprised to see Jack, Berry, JNT, Rachael Allen, SBW as contributing in the acknowledgements. Anyway what's shocking about this collection to me is that it was mostly written in 2011 - published 2012. This is a major episode of a break with the 2000s scene if we like to call it this and I think what Sam writes here is something a lot of very talented poets are still trying to work out how to write a decade later. It feels to me the relation is something like what anti-comedy is to comedy. But it's also his most lucid collection. the opener may just confirm my little suspicion about KKM & the publishing industry. Actually this whole collection places KKM very nicely for me. 81 is beautifully inspiring and chaotically horny I'm a convert
"this is me having my extremely nuanced feelings / overwhelmed by pop music and kind of enjoying it"
funny, playful, curious poems for the selfie generation, but a little hit-and-miss. can sometimes feel like the reading equivalent of overhearing an in-joke you're not privvy to.