Henry Neville (1620-1694) was an English author and satirist, best remembered for his tale of shipwreck and dystopia, The Isle of Pines published in 1668. He spent most of the period of the English Civil War travelling on the European continent. In April 1649 he was elected to Parliament to fill a vacancy as MP for Abingdon. By the end of 1651 he was a member of the Council of State, but found himself so hostile to Cromwell that he temporarily retired from active politics. However, he returned to Parliament in 1656, representing Reading, having become a member of Harrington's republican group. After the Restoration, he was arrested for treasonable practices in 1663 but was released without punishment. He spent the rest of his life in quiet writing and scholarship. Neville wrote a number of satires, the best known being The Parliament of Ladies. He also published translations from Latin and Italian, including works of Machiavelli.
Because this utopian text was written about 150 years after More's Utopia, the genre was more familiar to both the writer and the audience. The writing is much more polished in Isle of the Pines than in More's Utopia.
Although the writing is more polished which makes the reading of the text easier, the social prejudices are not so easy to read. An English gentleman sailor George Pine and 4 women--3 English and 1 African--settle the isle. George Pine enjoys the sexual services of all 4 women, each woman being the mother of her own tribe of Pine family. The African woman was treated with less respect and her progeny are said to be troublemakers, often for sexual misconduct. Is Henry Neville is agreement with this disrespect? Nothing indicates otherwise.
We continue to read this utopian piece because it somehow speaks to us. Maybe it is the robinsonade or arcadian elements. Those aspects are enjoyable fantasies. That humans can hack out a living in a fertile pleasantly-claimed land with few tools can be a comforting thought. Maybe that is why we continue to read.
This completes my reading from Three Early Modern Utopias. I will be writing a review for that book soon.
Înainte de Robinson Crusoe a existat Insula Fertilității, o poveste cu naufragiați, insulă pustie, comunitate utopică care duce însă înspre distopie datorită religiozității. Fără să fie grozav scris, fără aerul literar al romanului lui Daniel Defoe, Henry Neville scrie totuși acest mic roman în 1668. Recomandat celor care studiază antropologia, literatura comparată și curioșilor, celor de teapa mea. Nu e grozav ca literatură, dar merită citit. Și un mare bravo ptr editura Tracus Arte că a tradus așa ceva!
so you live on an island by yourself with four other women. imagine you sleep with 4 women. those 4 women give you 47 kids between them. and then you start pairing those kids together to reproduce. and then, when you're in your eighties, you have the AUDACITY to create a punishment for anyone who sleeps with their brother/sister, like that wasn't the whole way you created the life on that island in the first place!!!!
IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUNISH PEOPLE FOR FUCKING THEIR SIBLINGS, PUNISH YOURSELF, YOU NASTY
Just about intriguing enough to keep interest through the very few pages. Really not a true Utopian fiction (in the political/philosophical sense of the genre; à la Thomas More or William Morris) but an important work in the genesis of Robinson-Crusoe-esque fiction.
It's influence on later works, and the popularity it had at the time are what make it worth reading (though you get much more in this regard from reading the very good introduction and notes contained in "The Isle of Pines: An Essay in Bibliography"). As for the story alone, I'd not recommend it as an essential read, except for those who want to explore the history of Utopian fiction, but it's fun nonetheless.
The attitude towards race is problematic, as you would expect from that period in history, but we shouldn't excuse it it because of its age. There's certainly something to be learned (or at least reflected on) from a critical reading of this work.
"The Isle of Pines (1668) by Henry Neville relates how an English mariner, George Pine, discovers and populates a new land near the coast of Australia, producing 12,000 descendants in less than a century. This imaginary kingdom is distinguished by a remarkable sexual explicitness; one modern critic lists the erotic episodes (‘polygamy, voyeurism, cross-class intercourse … miscegenation and orgiastic sexual indulgence’) and notes that ‘“pines” is an anagram of “penis”’ [Bruce, xxxvii–viii]. It is debatable how useful it is to describe this ‘pornotopia’ as science fiction; but Neville’s fantasy of sexual fulfilment as social novum was no one-off." -Robert Adams, The History of Science Fiction
Easy to read, very playful but a bit problematic with issues surrounding racism and sexism, however it is a product of its time and could be incorporated to utopian/dystopian literature studies. Wouldn’t really consider it a crucial piece to read, but it is quite short and easy to follow when keeping in mind the time it was written and the primary ideas it tries to display or criticize.
i get it's a political satire and whatever but just... ugh. i do think some of the reviews of this aren't really understanding or considering that it is a critique of tyrannical monarchy, but still, it isn't good.
I think that the title's play on words is ingenious as who doesn't love a renaissance dick joke. It's an intriguing take on the basic instincts of mankind and colonization.
My wives having left bearing, my children began to breed apiece, so we were like a multitude. I'm torn between one and (a low) two stars. Even without the casual racism (with the slave girl Philippa with whom our "hero" mates with described as being an idiot and only mated by our "hero" because it was his last option), this is still a tale about a man taking several teenagers for his wives and forming a brutal Christian dictatorship with the offspring of his wives (whom somehow don't start either shooting blanks or forming hideously deformed children despite all being first cousins). The prose is workmanlike and dull, with absolutely no flair. The only saving grace of this story is that it is short.
Just about intriguing enough to keep interest through the very few pages. Really not a true Utopian fiction (in the political/philosophical sense of the genre; à la Thomas More or William Morris) but an important work in the genesis of Robinson-Crusoe-esque fiction.
It's influence on later works, and the popularity it had at the time are what make it worth reading (though, I suppose, you get much more in this regard from reading the very good introduction and notes, than from the short story itself). I'd not recommend it as an essential read, except for those who want to explore the history of Utopian fiction, but it's fun nonetheless.
The attitude towards race is problematic, as you would expect from that period in history, but we shouldn't excuse it it because of its age. There's certainly something to be learned (or at least reflected on) from a critical reading of this work.
Diese Kurzgeschichte zeigt in knappen und übersichtlichen 40 Seiten wie ein ganzes Volk, abgeschieden von jeglicher Zivilisation, entstehen und überleben kann. Ein Mann und vier Frauen als Stammhalter, welche als Schiffbrüchige auf einer unentdeckten Insel landen, bevölkern bald hunderte Abkömmlinge den Lebensraum und leben in vier unterschiedlichen "Stämmen" zusammen.
"Und nun bestellte ich sie in oder um mein 80. Lebensjahr und das 59. Jahr meiner Ankunft ein für allemal ein, um sie zu zählen, was ich auch tat, und fand, dass sich die Schätzung auf insgesamt 1.789 Personen belief."
Interessant ist zu sehen, dass dieses Volk, welches von den Engländer Pine ausging, einzig mithilfe seiner Weisungen, Erzählungen und der Religion fortbesteht. Von Generation zu Generation wird dieses Wissen weitergegeben und nur durch diese Traditionen kann dieses Volk in Frieden bestehen und überleben. Das Vergessen oder "Besserwissenwollen", als es die Schrift sagt, führt laut Neville zu Unruhen im Volk und bedroht dessen ganze Existenz.
"Der Quell dieser Zwietracht entsprang zunächst, wie ich verstehe, der Vernachlässigung des Hörens der Schriftlesung, die nach den Vorschriften meines Großvaters einmal im Monat in einer allgemeinen Versammlung zu halten war. Aber da viele von ihnen nun tief ins Landesinnere wanderten, vernachlässigten sie die Versammlung und alle anderen Mittel der christlichen Erziehung, durch die der Sinn für die Sünde unter ihnen gänzlich verloren ging."
Neville lässt nach Auflösung der Unruhen das Oberhaupt der Insulaner Gesetze verfassen, welche denen der Bibel sehr ähneln. Mithilfe dieser sollen in Zukunft wieder Ruhe und Frieden herrschen, so dass dieses kleine Volk ohne Furcht vor den Nächsten weiterleben kann. Neville macht in dieser Geschichte eine ganz klare Aussage: Verlässt man den von Gott vorgegebenen und gewollten Weg, gibt man sich bereitwillig der Sünde und dem Bösen hin, beginnt das Volk zu zerfallen und sich selbst zu zerstören. Auf der Insel im kleinen Maßstab. Betrachtet man unsere heutige, große Welt erkennt man jedoch gewiss die ein oder andere Parallele. Es lässt sich nicht leugnen, dass sich diese Geschichte aus dem 17. Jahrhundert tatsächlich auch auf unsere Moderne anwenden lässt.
"Aber da in großen Menschenmengen unweigerlich Unordnung heranwächst, die Starken die Schwachen zu unterdrücken versuchen und kein Band der Religion stark genug ist, die gefallene Natur des Menschengeschlechtes zu fesseln, entstand unter ihnen Zwietracht; und bald fielen sie von der guten Ordnung ab, die ihnen von meinem Großvater vorgeschrieben war."
Ob Neville Kritik am Zerfall der Religion in England und in weiser Voraussicht die daraus resultierenden Folgen aufzeigen wollte? Kann man seine Schiffbruchsgeschichte als Warnung verstehen? Ich denke es lässt sich hier sicherlich mehr als eine bloße, schöne Geschichte interpretieren. Auf dieser Insel wird ein neues, ein besseres, ein intelligenteres England geboren! Ein neues Inselvolk, welches sich bewusst wird, welchen Wert die Tradition und die Gesetze Gottes haben. Welches, gerade durch ihre geringe Anzahl, erfährt, wie gefährlich oder sogar tödlich es werden kann, versucht man nicht nach "Dein Wille geschehe" zu leben. Aus diesem Grund widerspreche ich Wikipedia und Übersetzer, dass diese Geschichte eine Dystopie sei. Sie zeigt uns ein neues Paradies, einen neuen Adam, ein neues Volk, welches, als es in Versuchung geführt wird, widersteht und den Sünder tötet, damit die Sünde nicht weiterleben kann! Der Niederländer, welcher die Insulaner entdeckt, stimmt mir da zu:
"Diesbezüglich können wir sie womöglich darin glücklich schätzen, dass sie wenig besitzen und doch alle Dinge genießen, da sie mit dem zufrieden sind, was sie haben. Ihnen fehlen jene Verlockungen zu Unfug, mit denen unsere europäischen Länder voll sind."
Eine Kurzgeschichte, die viel Raum für Interpretation und Spekulationen enthält. Neville hat uns eine Utopie hinterlassen, er ist eine ferne Stimme aus der Vergangenheit welche uns heute im 21. Jahrhundert immer noch nicht völlig erreicht hat. Tatsächlich wurde mir erst während des Schreibens dieser Rezension richtig bewusst wie viel hier eigentlich enthalten ist, auf "nur" 40 Seiten. Was braucht der Mensch wirklich mehr, als was die Natur uns geben kann?
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.