The literature on governmentality has had a major impact across the social sciences over the past decade, and much of this has drawn upon the pioneering work by Peter Miller and Nikolas Rose. This volume will bring together key papers from their work for the first time, including those that set out the basic frameworks, concepts and ethos of this approach to the analysis of political power and the state, and others that analyse specific domains of the conduct of conduct, from marketing to accountancy, and from the psychological management of organizations to the government of economic life. Bringing together empirical papers on the government of economic, social and personal life, the volume demonstrates clearly the importance of analysing these as conjoint phenomena rather than separate domains, and questions some cherished boundaries between disciplines and topic areas. Linking programmes and strategies for the administration of these different domains with the formation of subjectivities and the transformation of ethics, the papers cast a new light on some of the leading issues in contemporary social science modernity, democracy, reflexivity and individualisation. This volume will be indispensable for all those, from whatever discipline in the social sciences, who have an interest in the concepts and methods necessary for critical empirical analysis of power relations in our present.
In Governing the Soul, Rose ably uses Foucauldian theory to examine the creation of the modern citizen. A person with desires, neuroses, and ambitions, at once an autonomous being and the target of technical interventions from a wide range of psychological and para-psychological experts working at the behest of the state, corporations, and schools. Each of the chapter is rather brief and very Anglo-centric, but in total they offer a rather full and complex picture of Foucauldian subjectivity, and that key characteristic of the modern lifestyle, "the obligation to be free."
Modern people are confessing and self-censoring, and this transition unavoidably causes mental disorders. Psychoanalysis helps us to think in another person’s perspective and see a bigger picture, thus we can understand and accept those contradictory to our born instincts. Therefore I think it’s the brave who suffer from mental illness because they think on their own and a lonely walker might get trapped somewhere without community’s support. And it’s the necessity to get mental illness when we turn into left-alone adults from spoiled children, the former don’t get the support and understanding and rounding-up explanations from our parents or other elders as the latter. Especially as we grow up and become stronger, the parents seems less likely to be able to guide us.
This book combines self soul development with social development such as government policies, demands of war, psychology research discoveries, which is genuine perspective and this combination makes personal psychology grander and structural.
A delicious book to read. The notion of Hygiene of psychology really inspired me! To keep physical health, we need hygiene and exercise. Mental health need hygiene too, keeping away dirty stuff such as arguing and pushing people . So what’s the exercise of mental health? So intriguing book!😊
I have no idea why people would read Foucault and then try to replicate his style of writing. The ideas, which in turn are quite interesting, get buried in endless unneccessary yapping and unfocused concepts which might sound cool but in reality muddies the thinking. Employ your concepts clearly, concisely and try to utilize a period.
Nonetheless, it is an interesting book through some of the assessments, but there really comes a point where you have to say something beyond "a discourse which constitutes the neoliberal self".
Completa lo que Foucault no llegó a hacer en cuanto al siglo XX, pero lo hace sin crear mucho, sino en línea continuista pero con perspectiva muy relacionada a la anglósfera.
The first half of the book is quite hard to read. However the second part becomes better. The subject of shaping our selves, to me is very interesting. We might be living in a more enchanted world than some jungle tribes and their creation myths. That was a line I won't forget.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Academicians who deal with "psychological and behavioral science" should read this book and reflect on their own academic career and project of knowledge. Basically an application of Foucauldian analysis in studying the rise of psychological knowledge, by means of which the knowledge of "subjectivity" is advanced with greater precision in accordance with the demand of contemporary governmentality.
Kovasti haluaisin antaa viisi tähteä, mutta suomennos oli kerta kaikkiaan niin moninkertaisesti kapulakielinen, että en vaan pysty. Joutunen lukemaan tämän vielä uudestaan joskus, ja yritän muistaa tarttua englanninkieliseen versioon.
I read chapters 2 and 8 and found them very interesting. Now I need to go through and write up my notes on them. I hope I get another chance to read more.