2.5✨
Man, people were tough back then. This was fine? I was expecting a like survival/western horror esqe type story revolving around said blizzard but it was more of a western adventure story that happened to have a blizzard in it?
The story was fine and fairly interesting, but the prose and dialogue feels very…mundane? Idk if that’s the right word. Nothing is left up to interpretation. It’s very “this happened and this happened and this happened “. And the dialogue is very thorough- characters over explain everything they are doing and are going to do. There is zero miscommunication, everyone knows what’s happening/ figures out who is bad and who isn’t right away.
The story doesn’t really revolve around the blizzard, it’s more about the ranch characters trying to stop a cattle rustling operation lol.
But I still liked it despite that? It was almost charming in a way. And there are some good bits, like:
“He’s called to do it, Sweetheart. He’s God’s messenger.”
“Then God ought to pay the bill.”
Ha!
I also liked all the historical details in this, though if that’s less important to you, I think you’ll find it all very tedious. Since this author likes to write out every single thing characters do, there’s lots of mundane historical detail that I liked, as a look into what 1887/1888 ranch life was like. Can you imagine having the hand count cattle? That sounds terrible. But I guess that’s what they did back then, which I learned from this book (idk maybe that’s how they still do it today?).
This book isn’t very violent by western standards, mainly gunplay and a very protective dog, and frostbite descriptions, and there is no SA, though there are mentions of it, as a CW.
If you like westerns I think you’ll be fine with this, but I could see it being boring for others. Also don’t ever go out in a blizzard!
***spoilers ahead***
Maddie’s character was really interesting and apparently she had a really traumatic backstory and was a rape victim of men who tried to ransom her, and she was saved by a sex worker - more of that please? Not the rape, but I would’ve liked to have at least a flash back or something instead of her backstory just being causally brought up? It’d sounded way more interesting than a lot of the this plot.
Also very odd to me that the main bad guy just like dropped his wife off at a safe place and didn’t try to rob it/just left her there? I was expecting him to try and rob Chloe or like use Collette to rob Chloe and Collette’s character arc would be standing up to him and saving her grandma, but he just leaves her there and then isn’t a threat really for the rest of the book? I think it’s implied that he figure Chloe was poor and not worth it, but I still found that confusing considering he was a desperate criminal, the most dangerous kind.