Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

A History of Political Thought: Plato to Marx

Rate this book
This book in its second edition continues to examine in detail the fascinating evolution of the history of political thought - rich and diverse – through the works of thirteen key political thinkers (from Plato to Aristotle to Machiavelli to Hegel to Kant to Marx). It focuses on the recent interpretations of the classical texts, for instance feasibility of the ideal State in Plato; civic humanism and republicanism in Machiavelli; the radicalism of Locke, and the contributions to the woman’s cause by John Stuart Mill. The new edition includes two important liberal thinkers, Mary Wollstonecraft, the founder of liberal feminism and the other, Immanuel Kant, a de-ontological liberal; along with an Appendix on John Rawls.

576 pages, Kindle Edition

First published September 5, 2011

64 people are currently reading
557 people want to read

About the author

Subrata Mukherjee

49 books5 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
41 (41%)
4 stars
30 (30%)
3 stars
14 (14%)
2 stars
7 (7%)
1 star
6 (6%)
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
19 reviews
September 9, 2019
Loved the content, it covers a wide range of political philosophers I wanted to learn about. It's a great introductory book on political thoughts, esp given that it is written in chronological order, one can get to see how thoughts evolved over time.
However it is written in text book style and follows a strict format which seemed unnecessary at times.
1 review
August 1, 2019
Bekar
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Profile Image for El H Pea.
20 reviews
February 10, 2023
Good book and all, but my criticism is that the Conclusion or concluding topic is far too long to be a conclusion as one can deduce another whole (sub-)topic out if it. The authors should've just added another topic about/of Criticism about the Theorists/Philosophers and their Thoughts instead of shoving it all in the Conclusion as it makes the concluding parts uninteresting after awhile.
1 review
Currently reading
April 29, 2016
Dbfxjf fjglgs
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.