The notion of family is central to Maggie James' novels, which explore the gap between the idealised concept of the nuclear family and the reality of many family lives today: so often dysfunctional, dislocated, dissembled. Her third novel 'Guilty Innocence' is about the disintegration of the nuclear family and how the young people damaged by such ruin try to recreate the family in their own lives.
These young people do not come from typical nuclear families, of the sort that eleven-year olds Joshua Barker and Adam Campbell destroyed one day 12 years ago when they took two-year old Abby Morgan to a disused farm building where she met a terrible end. We are introduced to Joshua Barker as he is now, free again and returned to society with a new identity as Mark Slater. We learn he is an only child whose father died in car crash when Joshua was still a young child, and that his mother deserted him on his murder conviction, when he was just twelve years old. As Mark Slater, he has started a tentative relationship with Natalie Richards, also an only child. Natalie's father was a womaniser who left the family, divorced by her mother who has become agoraphobic and a virulent man-hater. Overweight, insecure, and lacking in self-confidence, Natalie has taken to comfort-eating as a way of coping with life.
Mark feels drawn to the surviving members of the Morgan family when he sees them on television at their annual vigil marking Abby's murder, and starts to think that the answers to some of the questions gnawing at him may be found there. He is intrigued by the image of Rachel Morgan, the middle child of three, blamed by her mother for her sister's death and disowned by her father, an alcoholic who abandoned the family after Abby's murder. But what of her brother Shaun, the only person to stand by Rachel? Is he the only person without guilt in this tormented world?
Behind the lives of these young people lurks the presence of Adam Campbell, convicted as a child killer while himself still a child, and - like Mark - now released from prison with a new identity. Adam enjoyed controlling others and inflicting pain on them. The very memory of him still menaces Mark, but is Adam unchanged and irredeemable? Does he still have an urge for cruelty?
Each character keeps his or her guilty secrets, each has been psychologically damaged by others, often those to whom they should be closest. There is a lack of parental love running through this story, as the young people struggle to cope with maternal desertion and the loss of father figures. Mark and Rachel have both been rejected by their mothers for very different reasons, while Natalie's mother has retreated into her own world as a refuge from men. In fact, throughout the story the mothers - Joanna Barker, Callie Richards, Michelle Morgan - remain peripheral, exerting their influences remotely over their children.
The story examines the fall-out from the horrific child murder primarily through the fragile relationship between Mark and Natalie. These two protagonists subconsciously feel their shared sensibilities, some undefined sense of a common understanding drawn from past events seemingly unknown to each other. Together they dream of the future as an idealised normality, an escape from their dysfunctional pasts. What Mark craves is "a loving relationship, his job at the building supplies firm, a home together. Children one day, perhaps. ... Stable, solid and good".
I felt that in this book the characters are more sympathetic, more deserving of our care, than those in the author's earlier books. The author suspends judgement of her characters and allows them to exist on their own terms, inviting the reader to keep an open mind and follow them to see where their individual journeys will take them. These young people are marginalised, cut off from the main flow of life, and inhabit a fringe world on the edges of society. They are caught somewhere between an oppressive guilt and the slim hope of redemption.
Judgement and understanding are key themes to this book, which asks us who are we to judge what we don't understand? The gaining of understanding is what drives Mark as he tries to make sense of the most senseless of crimes - a child murder. He must understand what effect his actions that fateful day have had on the victim's family, so that he can fully comprehend what he has done and somehow atone for it. In turn, Natalie must understand how Mark could have done what he did, or at least have allowed it to happen. Maybe if Natalie can understand Mark and his actions, or inaction, he can be redeemed.
But this clawing need for redemption takes Mark into dangerous waters, with catastrophic consequences for those drawn into his schemes for making sense of what happened all those years ago. Events start to spiral out of control, as the best laid plans unravel. Sometimes as the reader you feel like screaming "don't do that" at the characters, but the author skilfully navigates us through the more 'hard to accept' developments in the story. We stay with it to the end as the tension ratchets up and builds to a tremendous conclusion, when the plot opens up like a set of Russian dolls.
It is a novel that keeps you wanting to read on, to discover how it will all turn out for these insecure, screwed-up people, these people who are "down the weaker end of the resilience scale". Yet resilient is just what they prove to be, as each tries to muster hidden depths of strength and will to move forward in their life. You will find you really do care for them on their individual journeys.
It is a thoughtful, well-plotted and compelling read that keeps delivering surprises, as small details early in the story are revealed to be significant in the end. This is arguably Maggie James' best work to date.