My thanks to Pushkin Press for a review copy of this book via Edelweiss.
This is Amiko, Do You Copy? by Natsuko Imamura is another entry from Pushkin’s Japanese Novellas series, originally published in 2014 and in this translation by Hitomi Yoshio in 2023. This is the story of Amiko Tanaka, a young neurodivergent girl, who when the story opens, is living with her grandmother, and seems to have only one friend, Saki-chan whose visits she looks forward to. As she takes us back in time, we learn that she lived with her family, mother (whom we later see is her stepmother, a caring woman and not the typical fairy-tale one), father, and older brother, and led what one could describe as a ‘normal’ life, attending school, doing homework, and such. But being someone who doesn’t view life or society or the various frames society has created within which one is supposed to live from a ‘regular’ person’s perspective, we see that her so called normal life isn’t that; she skips school at times, eats rice and curry with her hands, likes to peep into the calligraphy classes her stepmother holds (especially as a young classmate she is interested in, Nori, is a student there), and sees only what appeals to her and not much else including among the people she might meet every day.
But things start to change for Amiko when her stepmother loses a child and falls into depression (set off in part by a rather callous act on Amiko’s part which the poor girl fails to realise the actual import of, since from her side she is doing it to comfort her mother), her brother takes up smoking and joins a biker gang, and her father is simply present but has little to do with her. Amiko must cope with everything around her on her own, navigating various situations she doesn’t understand.
Though narrated in third person, the story is told entirely from Amiko’s perspective and gives readers a sense of how someone in her situation sees, understands and experiences the world, and perhaps also how the world is built to accommodate only certain type/s of people and virtually locks out those that are different. As Amiko sees and experiences things from her own frames, in some senses, she remains protected from the hurt those around her might inflict—not sensing for instance when she is being avoided by someone; in others, even real physical hurt is taken much too lightly by her—the pain there but the act itself not affecting her the way it would others.
One doesn’t really get to see how Amiko’s family and friends view her situation or understand it. To an extent there is some understanding and much consideration from them, for instance she is rarely reprimanded for her ‘abnormal’ behaviour (though her stepmother does on one occasion tell her that she must do her homework, and so on); her brother Kota, though just a few years older is remarkably patient with her explaining to her to the best of his abilities how she must react in different situations, walking her back from school and putting up with antics an ‘ordinary’ teen might never do (after he joins the biker gang, this changes, but his presence in school and her being recognised as his sister protects her from the worst of bullies); likewise she is not scolded in school either, and she has a kind classmate who tries to help her in his own way.
But beyond this care, there also seems a lack of it, in that when there is a recognition that she is different, it doesn’t seem as if anything special is being done by them to understand her better or help her find a world she can fit in (I mean here may be a special school or homeschooling); and then when tragedy strikes, and Amiko gets more and more lost, even telling others what she is experiencing, she receives no attention whatsoever leaving her to deal with everything herself – a heartbreaking scenario for the readers to see.
This is a heart-wrenching book, especially as the reader can see more than Amiko does, but also one which leaves us with a lot of questions too, for beyond the typical and expected behaviours from fellow students (surprisingly considerate ones from some too) and the concern of a sort that is shown by family and teachers, one really doesn’t get to see their perspective on things, which would perhaps help us understand better why.
3.25 stars