I would like to thank the author Simon Hayes, the Rubriqs Press, and NetGallery for providing me with a free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. All opinions are my own.
There is an SNL skit that perfectly captures the basic function of a bank, which is to keep track of each customer’s money. The skit opens with a banker, in quintessential attire, addressing a boardroom full of employees and imparting his wisdom, while Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” plays in the background. “We will make a list of our clients” the banker explains “and how much money each of them has given us to invest. We will keep this list in a safe place. If we have time, we will make a copy of the list, in case something happens to the first list.” And he continues looking meaningfully at each and every one, “We must take special care of the list with each client’s name and the amount of money he has invested. If we were to lose that list, we would be ruined.” And without missing a bit, “If my wife calls while I’m in shagging my secretary, tell her I am at a board meeting. That way I will be able to continue shagging my secretary, without my wife knowing about it.”[*]
Martin “The Toad” Kellett, the Chief Risk Officer at the National Bank ‒one of the UK’s largest banks‒ may not have been shagging his secretary, literally at least, but this is his mentalité towards his employees and other people in general. When a young employee exposes a vulnerability in the bank’s cybersecurity system and manages to hack into Kellett’s bank account during a meeting, instead of being applauded, she gets fired and drummed out of the City. Kellett’s ego, his arrogance, his greed, and belligerence will set in motion a sequence of events that will threaten to ruin the economy of the United Kingdom. Because, as will become apparent eight years later, the young employee was right.
The premise of the book is fascinating. What would happen if the list were lost? Or to be more accurate, what would happen if zeros were added to the accounts of some customers. Instead of a typical bank heist (such as the one-billion-dollar heist North Korea almost pulled off a couple of years ago), where customers and the bank are losing money, in Zero Ri$k the customers are watching their balances getting inflated. This of course means that only the bank is losing money. Considering that very few banks and bankers were punished for the financial crisis of 2008, it is an attractive idea.
A brilliant hacker with the nom de guerre Joen van Acken has found a way to evade the sophisticated cybersecurity of the National Bank and starts making changes to the bank accounts of the customers. The event is so unprecedented that it could justifiably be described as a “Black Swan” (nice cover by the way!). Rob Tanner, the Chief Operating Officer of the bank, learns on December 23rd that the balance of a thousand and one bank accounts has been increased tenfold. Despite the objections of Kellett, who thinks that this is an isolated event that will be sorted-out quickly, Tanner enlists the help of a top cybersecurity expert, Ashley Markham. Together they will try to solve the puzzle of the attack in a race against time. And Tanner will be proven right, this was only the beginning. The changes to the bank accounts continue, and they spread to more accounts, and to other UK banks. They are accompanied by cryptic emails, taunting Kellett, Tanner, and others, with obscure references to art and popular culture and with references to Hieronymus Bosch’s representation of the seven deadly sins. “A cryptic soup of threat and menace,” as one character put it. [Not so much of a spoiler, but for those readers who want to start early and try to solve the puzzle themselves, there is a common thread that links all the emails.]
As I said, the main idea is fascinating, but I have two major issues with the execution, which explain the three stars. My first issue is the depiction of the characters. They all sounded the same to me even though each had their own backstory. This probably has to do with the voice of the narrator which overshadows every other voice in the book. Also, for some reason, I could not care for any of them, so I did not feel invested in what happened to them.
My second issue has to do with the length of the book. Do not get me wrong, I have read William L. Shirer’s The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. So, it is not the length per se, but the length in combination with the lack of suspense. For me, the story was predictable, so not much came as a surprise and I got a bit bored. Furthermore, I think that this book was in need of editing. There were too many awkward dialogues, unnecessary descriptions and details that did not offer anything and made the narrative bloated.
Take the following description, for example:
“Trapped in an unbreakable headlock of heavy yellow PVC, the fight drained from Tanner.”
Or this one:
“Chest heaving, he dragged himself to his feet, via his knees.” (emphasis my own) Who cares about this detail in general but especially during one of the most stressful moments of the book? Who needs to know this and why? The same could be asked for many other things that could have been omitted to make the narrative tighter.
Judging by the four- and five-star reviews, I am in the minority here. Despite my criticism and personal preferences though, I do think that Zero Ri$k is a solid debut novel that many will enjoy. With all the cyberattacks that have been happening over the last few years, the subject of the book is timely and thought-provoking. It makes you think about how precarious the systems we have built our lives on are, and how vulnerable we are to cyberattacks that could target one sector and, because everything is connected, affect or cause the collapse of others. Finally, I do agree with other reviewers on one thing: I would love to see this book as a mini-series!
[*] I owe the reference to this SNL skit to Zeke Faux’s Number Go Up.