History plays are possibly my favorite genre, and this one is generally good. The plot is a bit confusing because some events occur simultaneously--with different parts of the stage representing different places and conversations. But for the most part this is an interesting exploration of the politics of Catholic struggles for toleration in late Elizabethan and early Stuart England. The play loosely focuses around the Gunpowder Plot, though Guy Fawkes plays surprisingly little role, considering how closely his name is associated with the plot. Instead, it focuses on the competing political tides that pushed and pulled at the issue of tolerance. On the Catholic side there are those dedicated to violent revolution in the name of installing a Catholic monarchy, but there are also those who oppose violence and believe in the power of reform. On the other side, there are those who favor violent repression of Catholics (though this position isn't given much stage time). Then there is James, who wants to rule but feels he has very little control over anything, and the scheming Cecil, who works as spymaster and political councilor. His goal is pragmatic and his methods are realpolitik. All of these competing ideals, goals, aspirations, and hopes for England co-exist uneasily, often clashing violently in a way reflective of the political and religious chaos of the early 17th century.
Not massively impressed. It probably works better on stage. An interesting attempt, but not quite convincing. I don't think it does a great job of explaining for the audience the politics of the time.