What do you think?
Rate this book
Looking At the Liturgy
Nichols assesses the liturgical reform from the three converging viewpoints of a historian, sociologist and cultural critic, pinpointing areas that need to be addressed.
91 pages, Kindle Edition
First published April 15, 2011
7 people are currently reading
85 people want to read
About the author
Aidan Nichols
107 books48 followersJohn Christopher "Aidan" Nichols O.P., S.T.M. (born 17 September 1948) is an English academic and Catholic priest.
Nichols served as the first John Paul II Memorial Visiting Lecturer at the University of Oxford for 2006 to 2008, the first lectureship of Catholic theology at that university since the Reformation. He is a member of the Order of Preachers (Dominicans) and is the Prior of St Michael the Archangel in Cambridge.
Nichols served as the first John Paul II Memorial Visiting Lecturer at the University of Oxford for 2006 to 2008, the first lectureship of Catholic theology at that university since the Reformation. He is a member of the Order of Preachers (Dominicans) and is the Prior of St Michael the Archangel in Cambridge.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Read
November 26, 2012Yes.
November 30, 2019
Fr. Nichols traces the origins of the Liturgical Movement to moderate elements of the Enlightenment, with its emphasis in the direction of the “anthropocentric, moralistic, voluntaristic, didactic, subjectivist”. I found the style of writing to be annoying at first, and I almost put the book down, but I warmed up to it about half way through the book. Nichol’s analysis was too interesting to let that get in the way.
This book was intended to be a contribution to the liturgical debate of our time and I value the insights Nichols brings together from sociology, anthropology, and other fields. As he says at the beginning of the book, “Liturgy is too important to be left to liturgists.”
I was fascinated to learn how it was actually the liturgists who wanted to reform the liturgy behind closed doors before anyone could intervene to stop it. “The extraordinary thing about these meetings was that with few exceptions they were held behind closed doors, by invitation only [...] Part of the reason for this coyness was, no doubt, fear of adverse reaction by Rome.”
And “One must, I think, conclude that the principal reason for the adoption of an in camera method was that liturgists considered their subject too technical to be safely entrusted, even in part, to the judgment of nonliturgists.”
This is a pretty dense book with a lot to think about. It ends with some proposals of what could be done next. You might agree or disagree, and perhaps Fr. Nichols would have more to say in light of Summorum Pontificum and later developments.
This book was intended to be a contribution to the liturgical debate of our time and I value the insights Nichols brings together from sociology, anthropology, and other fields. As he says at the beginning of the book, “Liturgy is too important to be left to liturgists.”
I was fascinated to learn how it was actually the liturgists who wanted to reform the liturgy behind closed doors before anyone could intervene to stop it. “The extraordinary thing about these meetings was that with few exceptions they were held behind closed doors, by invitation only [...] Part of the reason for this coyness was, no doubt, fear of adverse reaction by Rome.”
And “One must, I think, conclude that the principal reason for the adoption of an in camera method was that liturgists considered their subject too technical to be safely entrusted, even in part, to the judgment of nonliturgists.”
This is a pretty dense book with a lot to think about. It ends with some proposals of what could be done next. You might agree or disagree, and perhaps Fr. Nichols would have more to say in light of Summorum Pontificum and later developments.
April 6, 2025
Looking at the Liturgy is a fantastic book in which Aidan Nichols incisively critiques the post-Vatican II Catholic liturgy. This is not a fideistic call for return to the Tridentine Mass, but rather a historical, sociological, and theological critique of several particular issues with the way the new rite is celebrated. This book was written nearly thirty years ago but is still relevant today’s Church, especially for clergy or people otherwise involved in liturgical celebrations.
October 7, 2024
It would have been nice if people like this guy had been in charge of the liturgical reform.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews