Frigate Commander

by Tom Wareham

Based on the private journal of Lieutenant—and then Captain—Graham Moore, a naval officer serving during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, Frigate Commander reveals the problems an officer had in managing the crew of a frigate, maintaining discipline, and turning his ship into an efficient man of war.

Genres: History, Naval History

Mass Market Paperback

First published September 1, 2004

About the author

AKA Richard Thomas (The Wapping Conspiracy) - now reissued under Tom Wareham's name.

Reviews

[Burt · Rating 4 out of 5]

Readers of O'Brian and Stockwin always marvel at the authenticity of the works; they get the feeling that they are there in the early 19th century, standing by their heroes. Reading Wareham's "Frigate Commander" lets us know how the masters achieved their fine touch. The language, customs, and views come from primary source material and Wareham's book is that indeed. Graham Moore's journal entries are amplified by Wareham's interpretations, which seem never to be intrusive or overly explanatory.

Most of us who read in the Wooden Ships and Iron Men era must digest an entire series of novels to see a character's career unfold. Graham Moore's career, through the efforts of Tom Wareham, is encompased between the covers of one book.

If you like ships and the Age of Sail, and if you like primary source material, you will really enjoy "Frigate Commander."

[QOH · Rating 5 out of 5]

Delightful account, relying primarily on Graham Moore's diaries, showing that this sensitive, contemplative man was an effective frigate captain. The book focuses primarily on Moore's life *as* a frigate captain (fair enough, given the title). Still, it would have been lovely to have more detail about Moore's later career. The "Long Decline" chapter is actually a very quick denouement.

I'm not sure if it's a feature or a bug to read the accounts of ship-to-ship actions primarily as one huge block of quoted text. (It could be my personal failing; as a lawyer, I see block quotes and my brain turns off. Huge block quote=skip and find out who won in the end. It works for legal reading, too.)

Even so, Moore was a skilled and wry diarist and the author does a great job of weaving Moore's diary with his own commentary in every other part of the book.

[Patrick B · Rating 4 out of 5]

Very Good

This is required reading because it centers around Moore’s personal journal which you don’t find often for this time period and this particular war. I do think the bios on Ed Pellew, Commander, and Thomas Cochrane, Cochrane, are more enjoyable.

[Eve · Rating 4 out of 5]

Good read, but a little bit dull at times.

[Michael Smith · Rating 5 out of 5]

You can read all you want about the history of the Royal Navy during the Napoleonic era (and I do), but no matter how astute and evocative an historian’s narrative is, it can never compete with the words of the men who actually took part in the events of the day. When Wareham published his very well received Star Captains a few years ago -- a study of the exploits of that small group of the most outstanding frigate captains and the mostly single-ship actions in which they took part -- the principal criticism he heard was that he hadn’t gone into enough depth on any one of them. This engrossing and extremely enjoyable volume redresses that by presenting the career of Lieut., then Capt., Graham Moore, who served in Newfoundland, then in the Brest blockade under Sidney Smith, then was present at the Spithead mutiny, then took part in the destruction of the French fleet off Ireland in 1798. Most famously, his squadron captured a Spanish treasure squadron in 1804, and he also was involved in the Trafalgar campaign. But what makes all this so fascinating is that more than half the words in the book are Moore’s own, extracted at length from his thirty-seven volume (!) personal journal, now housed at Cambridge. Moore was a thoughtful and astute officer, learning from both the good and bad commanders under whom he served, and arriving at his own ideas and conclusions in managing a ship and especially its crew. Moreover, much of what he says contradicts the clichés about the Royal Navy of the period. He also carefully recorded many aspects of his social life, the balls and dinners he attended, and also discussed the way “interest” worked in furthering a young officer’s career. Finally, Moore’s father was a well-known Glasgow physician and his grandfather a minister, but while Moore was well educated, his style and vocabulary seem much more modern than Georgian; he reads almost like Patrick O’Brian. This is a must-read for any student of the period.

[Scott · Rating 3 out of 5]

Picked up a copy to pass time at work. It was hard getting into but once I did it was OK. I was expecting more personal writing and not just excerpts.