What an interesting book. What a horribly interesting book. This book was actually disgusting. The kind of book that makes one want to bury one's head in the sand. The main problem with the book was that it's based on real life. Real debased life. Real debased, depraved life in the late eighteenth century.
See, the book didn't just contain expletives, crude language, adultery, and all the rest of sexual perversity. That was the whole point. Is it wrong, or is it not? Is it wrong to marry someone else when you're already married, even if you're halfway across the world? Unfortunately, the answer was no. So what if Ralph is committed to another woman? There are some whores on this continent that might be attractive, and Ralph doesn't like his wife anymore, anyway. (Or does he? No one really knows, but the fact remains: his feelings toward Alicia were much more unkind than his feelings toward Mary)
What was interesting about this book--aside from the real life aspect--was how it was portrayed as just a way of life. The lifestyle certainly wasn't portrayed as bad, but neither was it portrayed as good. It just was a way of life, and it was necessary. A necessary evil, if you will. Adultery and sodomy were accepted, as well as thievery. Because most of the characters were criminals, criminality was not condemned. It certainly wasn't approved, but again, these people were criminals; they made their beds, now they must lie in them. That's just the way it is, and it wouldn't do any good to harp on the lawlessness. I understand that, yet the whole subject was avoided altogether. (I realized this was because of the author's perspective, not because of the direction he wanted to take the book) Everything was stated very factually; for example, people said what their crime was without flinching or blushing. Since everyone's in the same boat, no one needs to be ashamed or repent. At first I didn't mind that, because I'm sure that's realistic, but it finally got to the point where treating criminals any less than upstanding citizens was wrong. I hate to break it to anyone who doesn't know it already, but there's a reason these people are separated from the real world. (Granted, the punishments back in those days were excessive) They broke the law, and if they haven't reformed, they have no right to be treated like any other upstanding citizen.
Well, that was a long rant. Let me rant some more, this time about the characters. First we have Ralph, the playmaker. Pretty decent guy at first. He didn't take a lag wife. He's a pretty loyal guy. Not a bad friend. Then he starts going downhill. First, we discover that the play he's chosen is absolute garbage. (The worst part is that people find it humorous) Then we discover he doesn't have any regard for Christianity, even though he calls himself a Christian. (I can't remember if he claimed to be a Protestant or Catholic, but it doesn't matter. He doesn't follow any of either's teachings) Finally, he tops it all off and is unfaithful to his wife. (All the while justifying it, of course) Yeah, he's one of the worst protagonists I've ever read.
Then we have Ralph's faithful friend, Harry. Oh, wow, we can get worse. Not only does he have a foul mouth, he also has a criminal past--which he only regrets because he doesn't want to be found out--and he's downright creepy. He has a relationship with a girl that's what--20-something years younger than he? Honestly, I think that's pretty close to sexual abuse, because I don't believe Duckling was very pleased to be in that relationship. (Although I couldn't really tell--it got pretty vague there at the end) But it's okay, because apparently the 'relationship' was more fatherly than anything else. Give me a break.
H.E. was an interesting person. He seemed mysterious to me, because of his initials that were never clarified. I had respect for him for longer than I respected Ralph. But when one character began explaining that H.E. holds high standards not because of a respect for Christian beliefs, but because of some other mumbo jumbo, I just rolled my eyes, and looked for some sand to hide my head in. I appreciated his kindness toward Arabanoo. But these people are so depraved, they think that because H.E. loved someone, that must mean that he's a Sodomite! Ugh. I think they need a real Christian example. (Which leads me to my next character ...)
Pastor Dick Johnson. How many times can we deride the only continent's pastor? For being too weak, for being too strict (Oh, he doesn't approve of a play filled with sexual innuendo, that reflects the current situation on this penal colony? How could he?!), for condemning Ralph for his filthiness ... Dick was condemned for being too strict, but in reality he was much too weak. I'm certain much of the pastor's portrayal is due to the author's perspective, but Dick didn't act like a Christian much. He confronted Ralph in a pretty good way, but in any other aspects of life, he doesn't assert any authority. He doesn't have a reputation of being a minister, one who can lead you to repentance and a new life. He has the reputation of someone you can ask a favor from, and maybe he'll help you. But mostly, he's that naysayer in the background. He made arguments against the play (pretty good ones, in my opinion) but they weren't refuted. Just ignored. It's nice to be able to ignore reason and truth. People do it all the time nowadays. Why not portray that in a book?
That said, it was an interesting look into the penal colony of the late 1700's. (That's the only reason I read this book, anyway) I wasn't as bothered by the content as I could have been because of the ... blasé approach to all of the sin. It was both detailed and glossed over at the same time. The details were not sensual. I'm not sure they were particularly glorified. But there is no avoiding it. As I said, that's what the whole plot revolves around. And the conclusion is far from satisfactory. I would only recommend this book if you really need information about the New South Wales penal colony in the late 1700's, and you don't mind a bit more than a smattering of language. (Harry is the worst offender) The historical fact part of it is the only reason my star rating reached a two. Other than that, it was merely a reflection of the most debased society.