First, thank you to Allison Trebacz for an eARC of this book and congratulations to her on her debut novel.
If you enjoyed the stabby FMC vibes of Throne of Glass, the military complex/academy of Fourth Wing or Ember in the Ashes, then you may enjoy this book.
The positives first:
- The magic system is interesting and feels like a unique twist on how we often see magic depicted in similar books.
- I enjoy the relationship between Reina and Leena, and wish we got more of that dynamics, especially how their friendship started.
Now the less positive:
- while I think the magic system has potential, it was never well explained. In fact, much of the world building feels unexplained, and not in the "you'll learn more in future books" kind of way. For much of the book, it felt like we were presented with information and perspectives as though we had already learned some of the relevant background, without us having learned the relevant background. Also, this world has dragons AND griffons, and yet we see like nothing of them. I WANT MORE DRAGONS!
- I wanted more from the characters in term of background. Related to above, Reina thinks alot about Arden and the blood oath she made to him, but we never really get a straightforward explanation of what happened, how she felt when her mother was executed, what drove her to the priest to see her future etc. Instead we get a lot of vague background about how she's his viper, without really ever saying what that means. She was an assassin? A spy? I assumed assassin, but then she sometimes acts like she's never killed someone before.
- The love interest and romance is boring. Farran kind of comes out of nowhere and it feels very insta-love. It also really annoyed me that he just calls her "darling" for no real reason and she just kind of...accepts it? I'm not a fan of unnecessary pet names between love interests, but at least the independent FMC at least kind of objects to nicknames at first.
- Finally, on the writing craft itself. There are A LOT of typos, missed words and what feels like unfinished sentences. I was making notes of them at first, but then it just got to be too many to feel worth it. Normally, I wouldn't comment on it, especially for an ARC, but they were frequent enough that they were both distracting and led to confusion. Related, the dialogues between the characters often felt a little nonsensical. In normal human conversation, we will frequently repeat what is said to us, if paraphrased. It sometimes felt like Trebacz had originally arranged the dialogue with one set of words, thought it was too reptitive and so had one of the characters use a synonym. While that would be fine for regular narrative, it is jarring in the context of conversation. At other times, it felt like the characters were replying to dialogue that never actually happened - either because it was just out of the blue or it was responding to their thoughts. Again, this makes me suspect it was a casualty of revisions and editing moving things around, and the not properly reconnecting the dots.
All in all, I'm not dying for the next installment, but I might consider checking it out if I have gaps in my TBR or library holds.