It's 1812, and Major (yes, you read that right) Sharpe is assigned to take some French forts and deny the enemy access to the river.
And that's about it.
So, first of all, I have to say that I love the Sharpe books. Sharpe himself is my all-time fictional hero, and if I'm having a bad day at work, my first thought is always, what would Sharpe do?
But despite that, there's no other way to say it, Sharpe's Command is a pile of crap.
To begin with, Sharpe isn't promoted to Major until the end of 1812, in Sharpe's Enemy. And to make it worse, there's a serious editorial slip when Sharpe is mentioned as Captain at least once in the novel.
On the subject of editing, apparently Bernard Cornwell hasn't re-read the Sharpe books, so may not have been certain when Sharpe was promoted, but he must have had his manuscript edited before publication, and surely someone must have noticed such continuity howlers.
Sadly though, that was just the start. The dialogue is utterly hackneyed and repetitive, and there definitely should have been the opportunity to call the French more than simply 'buggers,' which really, really loses its originality very quickly. The Saint Barbara line from Lieutenant Love is also so over-used that it loses all effectiveness.
The characters also, are utterly single dimensional, and no more so than the villain. In pretty much every other Sharpe novel, the bad guy is always a major draw, and actually has some skills, be that either diplomacy, courage, and almost always fighting. But this one, known as 'the hero,' has nothing going for him. He gives Sharpe absolutely no challenge whatsoever, and makes his mission in this book seem so utterly pedestrian, that yes, it's boring.
Even the battle scenes, well, meh, they're kind of just okay, and nothing like as visceral as usual.
The whole thing leaves me with some disturbing possibilities. Either Bernard Cornwell thinks that editing and polishing manuscript drafts aren't needed, because surely that hasn't happened here. Or, he's reached the point of simply churning out sub par product for the pay cheque.
I really hope I'm wrong on both counts, but suspect that I might not be.
I re-read Sharpe's Regiment and Sharpe's Siege on either side of Sharpe's Command, and the difference couldn't be more complete.
Quite frankly, if this was the first Sharpe book to be written, it wouldn't have been published. Yes, it's that bad.