I thoroughly enjoyed “Deadfall” by Aline Templeton. It contained many features I consider essential for a good mystery:
1) Good writing (the most important component);
2) Character-driven rather than plot-driven; and
3) Sensory images that immerse the reader in the setting.
Although “Deadfall” is the sixth instalment of the Kelso Strang series, it was the first Aline Templeton novel I have read. At no point did I feel lost. Enough information was provided about Strang to enable me to understand his actions, but the story focused more directly on the needs and motivations of characters embroiled in a unique setting .
Brief Synopsis
The Drumdalloch Woods is a privately owned forest situated on the Black Isle in the Scottish Highlands. Filled with thick, dark trees, a sanctuary for woodland birds, its owner, Giles Forsyth, considered Drumdalloch a sacred trust to be passed on to future generations. Giles did not believe that either of his two children—Oriole, his daughter, or Perry, his son—would carry on this historic legacy and consequently was planning to bequeath it to his daughter-in-law, Helena. Then Helena died in a freak accident. Or was it an accident? Her ten-year-old son, Jay, didn’t believe that it was, but no one listened to him.
Three years later, Giles has died and his two children are waiting for approval of their ownership rights. Oriole, still lives in the large deteriorating house in the woods and is struggling to pay her bills; Perry, who works for his cousins—a branch of the wealthy Forsyths in Edinburgh—has been living comfortably until he is laid off from the family firm during an economic downturn. No one at his firm was sorry to see him go, as several staff members had accused him of bullying and harassment. The loss of his generous salary means that he must return to Drumdalloch, accompanied by Jay, his sullen thirteen-year-old son.
Several people have plans for Drumdalloch. Pompous Professor Michael Erskine views getting the woods officially transferred to the Institute for Studies in Biological Sciences as his way to academic respectability. After all, the Institute has had unfettered access to them for scientific research for almost 100 years. Hot tempered Norwegian graduate student, Lars Andersen, is consumed by his own research project and wants nothing to interfere with his work. Hotel owner Steve Christie needs Perry’s cooperation to include the woods in a luxury hotel investment. And Perry intends to sell to the highest bidder.
Another death, and this one was not an accident, although it doesn’t appear to have been a well-planned murder. After being struck in the head, the victim toppled into a pond and drowned; it appeared to be an opportunistic crime, one committed on impulse. Called in to carry out the investigation, DCI Strang collected his overnight bag and drove to the isolated peninsula. He was followed by his regular (and favourite) assistant, DS Livvy Murray. But what appeared to be a simple act of temper turns out not to be so simple to unravel, as Strang and Murray dig deeper.
What I Liked
1) I thoroughly enjoyed the description of the setting—the woods, alternatively ominous and majestic, mysterious and yet home to hundreds of birds that formed a chorus to greet visitors. To a Canadian reader, it seemed very familiar, close to home, even if the mixture of exotic trees, planted as a private sanctuary, differed from what I typically see in my homeland. But the important thing was that the author’s narrative helped me see and hear the environment.
2) Many of the characters were well-drawn, and unique, not stereotypes. I especially liked the picture of Oriole as it unfolded by showing how others viewed her, as well as her own thought patterns. Awkward, graceless, with a sad-spaniel face and a tendency to continuously talk whenever given the slightest amount of attention, most people pitied her. Steve Christie was her opposite—charming, well-liked, but hiding secret fears. Even Lachie MacIver, a minor character who played a small but significant role, was distinct. Only a major villain was conventionally villainous, but no attempt was made to hide his nefarious personality from the moment he made his first appearance.
3) As mentioned earlier, I loved the author’s writing style—descriptive, yet clear, not pretentious. I quickly flew through the story, finishing it in record time (for me).
What I Didn’t Like
In terms of the police investigation, the killer was identified. But a comment near the end showed that, although guilty of many things, he couldn’t have committed the opportunistic murder. It was left to DS Murray, in her mind, to make the connections that solved that crime. But there was no proof, and Murray decided to leave it be, because it was just a “gut” feeling about who was responsible.
Initially, because of this ambiguous ending, I was going to give “Deadfall” a four-star rating. But then, while re-reading sections of the book to write this review, I came across a passage early in the story that predicted exactly how the real killer thought. The solution was planted early, and easily overlooked by the multitude of details that followed. So, in light of the fact that I overlooked this clue, I am rating it as 4.5 stars, upped to 5.
Thanks to Allison & Busby for providing an electronic copy of this book via Netgalley. This review is voluntary and contains my honest opinions.