What do you think?
Rate this book


416 pages, Hardcover
First published February 4, 2025

My outlook on narrative is that, as [Dionne] Brand says, I quite agree with what she says about the kind of power structures that the grand narrative of history, the history of the transatlantic slave trade, the history of colonialism, which is the major organizing principle of our world, the way that has been reproduced in the library and what we like to think of as the primary library, the main forms of description, the main phonetics of myth, the main knowledges that come to us with all kinds of contradictions that we might not give the required skepticism to that we should because we have been conditioned in the workshop, so to speak, of colonial literary forms.
I knew that in entering Code Noir, I wanted to have a different orientation to the narrative that would be about the ways that we actually tell stories in spite of the dominant narratives and the dominant narrative modes. When you encounter anybody out there, there is a kind of embodied storytelling that we find ourselves in the presence of.
[...]
The different orientations that people have to different ways of telling stories, the grand orality of the Caribbean, and the kind of mellifluous multiple censorial that something like that offers, that was my guiding principle in the book, which is why there is, to my mind, a poetics of intimacy at play. What we have in the book are a lot of people telling each other stories. These are the ways, really, truly.
If you want to think about the invitation of Code Noir, my Code Noir, the book next to King Louis the XIV Code Noir, the invitation is that there are all of these practices that we carry about in our person that allow us to survive what should be unsurvivable. There are places in us, on the inside of us that the law, the “blunt instrument of the law” in its conflations with morality and ethics as we know that don’t always bear out, and that are outright lies sometimes or most of the time, it’s about power and instituting balances of power or imbalances of power, and allow the most powerful and moneyed in the world to carry on as if the world only belongs to them, how we survive that are the things that actually fall outside the dominant structures that we encounter in the temporality and in the improvisations of our daily living.
I wanted to find these modes and make them central to the forms of storytelling that happen in the book, that choreography between the stories, and what the main voices are doing. I do use first-person narration quite a lot and even in the opening remarks that I read just a little bit ago but it is a shape-shifting perspective. That voice treats the project of making a book. It’s the book being aware of itself really. The stories are sentient things.
[...]
We move by a different kind of authority, not one that is interested in domination or the singular characterization of the hero and that arc, the beginning, middle, and end hero’s journey but in another orientation to agency and not necessarily to a kind of broad strokes authority in which you simply have the fictive spell that reduces the world only to its instrumental parts. The different kinds of storytelling are about privileging the relational over the instrumental.