Oh, brother! Is it possible to just leave this review at that?
Well, for future reference, Captain Paul is a book filled with melodramatic scenes that beg to be forgotten and boisterous scenes of bravery that provoke repeated eye rolls. As chance would have it, the occurrence of the unbelievable coincidence is a key facilitator in every turn of the plot. And while the language may be reflective of the diction used during this book’s publication in 1846, fermenting Dumas' words over 150 years of time only served to exaggerate their sappiness. Yes, there is drama and action, but it’s more along the lines of The Princess Bride rather than those of The Sea Wolf.
On a more interesting note, this book is one of three books that are loosely connected by the interests of their writers. The connection started with Water Scott’s publication of The Pirate in 1822. James Fenimore Cooper, having served in the US Navy, read The Pirate and considered the novel to be a less-than-true depiction of life at sea. Cooper then proceed to write The Pilot: A Tale of the Sea, which was published in 1824. Then Dumas enters the picture. Dumas felt that “the pilot” in Cooper’s novel, the famous John Paul Jones, was left mostly undefined as a character. As a result, in 1838, Dumas wrote Captain Paul and proceeded to decorate the legend in flamboyant style. Of the three novels, I still have not read Scott’s The Pirate.