(Audible) Very serious subject, which was somewhat lost in the denigration of men. The author, who is a college professor, minimizes the negative impact that women have on women on-line and in social media. In her view it is primarily the patriarchy and negative (read 90%) men that create the toxicity women experience on social media.
In my naïveté, I continue to think that the sharing of good ideas is a noble, worthwhile pursuit. Books like this let me know it is all about echo chambers in 2024. The book was not written for me (black male professional), doesn’t anticipate I will read it and clearly doesn’t care if it is offensive, insofar as it categorically condemns men.
Not sure why the author is obsessed with women running for political positions when money runs America, but the author repeatedly discusses parents not posting embarrassing things that might impede their daughter’s chance to become President or a senator. I suspect is may have been more useful to address the friendship famine that exists for the majority of women, rather than the political aspirations of a few dozen women, but that suggestion may be what she seems as patriarchy.
The author makes the point that sexting is child porn and may be prosecuted as such, a point I made 10 years ago in 2014 at a talk at Archer High School in Georgia (see Lawrence Lewis Attorney Sexting on YouTube). The only reason I make reference to the talk posted on YouTube is the authors repeated emphasis on giving credit to women (I assume she also means men) who original constructed an idea or dance or invention. That last sentence should demonstrate that I, in fact, complete the book.
I have to address some of the crazy things that were reduced to writing in the book: (1) women primarily do sex work on-line and Only Fans because their body will not allow them to perform a 9-5 job (their disability forces them to do Only fans); and (2) beautiful, intelligent, sophisticated women are freezing their eggs and falling for catfish scams on-line because…(her reason: men are toxic and evil and cannot appreciate the value of this type of woman) (Kevin Samuels reason: she has overvalued herself and at 35 has no chance of securing a high value man, which is why, in her desperation, she is falling for foolishness on-line). The author, who knows about but clearly ignores red pill content on-line, makes mention of her beautiful, erudite, successful female friend, who is now in her early 30s, and describes her as being disadvantaged in the internet dating world. I know the author doesn’t listen to the now-deceased Kevin Samuels, otherwise she would know her friend, who wants to be in a serious relationship with a man, created her own disadvantage by passing on suitable men for fourteen (14) years - age 18 to 32. Now that she has developed into the woman that other women, like the author admires, doesn’t mean that men will value that. MEN DON’T VALUE WHAT WOMEN VALUE, and they are not going to change their values because women used their 20s and early 30s to chase their dreams. That part of the book struck such a discordant note in my head.
In the end, I don’t think the author makes many good points for not abandoning social media. With 5 billion people on social media, the only answer is to get off completely if you don’t want “any” idiots to have access to you.