This is a very strange book. I knew and liked some of the author's previous work as a poet, and I have an interest in wild plants. I wanted to know what she would have to say about moss. I wanted to learn more about moss. I thought the book would be about moss.
It certainly has a lot of moss in it. But moss is weird. It's been around forever and seems to harken back to the stage when seaweed had just about made it onto the land. Elizabeth-Jane Burnett spends a lot of time here in bogs with sphagnum mosses. But the further I got into the book, the more convinced I became that a) there was a lot of different kinds of moss about and b) that the author's relationship with it was pretty mystical, but the less clear I became about what she was actually saying.
However, I did learn about moss as I went on, though mainly not from the author. Each moss she mentions appears in a poem on its own page, titled with her own name for it, subtitled with its Latin name. These poems have their own (smaller) typeface and follow various shapes and forms. Generally they don't rhyme. I learned about each moss from googling its Latin name and finding some images (so I could try to visualise what she was talking about) and/or an information page from one of the 'bryological' sources ('bryology', as I now know well, being the branch of botany that deals with mosses).
Was this frustrating? Yes, to some extent, though largely because I wasn't looking for the right thing. The back jacket doesn't actually say the book is about moss. It says she treads her way through wetlands "threading her way through grief". It says the book "thrums with loss -- and is scattered with poems about moss." All true.
I did learn a good bit about the author, and I found much of that interesting, if odd. Her mother's background and her own early memories of Kenya were most interesting. Her intensely empathetic feelings towards moss were harder for me to relate to. Her magnetic attraction to waterways and bogs? Hm. Her grief over her father's death, fine. The moss poems I could live without.
Many poets these days write prose poems. This poet writes a prose memoir that uses, on its prose pages, an unusual amount of poetic techniques. Masses of alliteration, assonance, abstraction, intense metaphor. Lots of present tense narrative, including many 'I think' observations (poets always want you know what they're thinking). But perhaps her extensive rhyme (which I note one GoodReads reviewer describes as 'relentless') is the most unexpected prose feature, and it seems to increase as she goes on. Sometimes it works quite pleasingly, especially when winding up a point ("There are gaps in the record where we don't know what grows. There are gaps in the explored where nobody goes." Ch.4, p. 62). In other places, as further down the same, I found it painful ("In such a space, mosses might grow and fledgling feelings flow - sprinklings of joy that, elsewhere, might be shouted down, can here find quieter ground.") I'm just not sure about "sprinklings of joy" either. Sometimes I did find the choice of words bordering on flowery (in a negative sense).
It is clear that the author knows a lot about moss. No question about her level of expertise. But she often uses botanical language without explaining it, or certainly without explaining it at point of first usage, and I'm not sure this is helpful, though I figure it's a thing that poets also do. Make the reader work!
One book she footnotes a couple of times is Robin Wall Kimmerer's Gathering Moss. This book is also a kind of memoir, or certainly more than another bit of botany. But Kimmerer does explain things for those new to moss. Early on, for example: "A true moss or bryophyte is the most primitive of land plants. Mosses are often described by what they lack, in comparison to the more familiar higher plants. They lack flowers, fruits and seeds and have no roots. They have no vascular system, no xylem and phloem to conduct water internally. They are the most simple of plants, and in their simplicity, elegant."
Elizabeth Jane Burnett knows all this and more. But when she starts to put it into poetical language, somehow it's really hard to process. I need the Kimmerer introduction to be able to 'get' the Burnett poetical description, viz:
"As the mosses soak up rain they fill with green, like a light coming on. There is a charge, channelling through the leaves [ ...]. Seen under its [microscope] lens, a moss leaf becomes an ethereal, underwater creature, with the long writhe of itself channelling endlessly, rhythmically, luminous. While most of the other plants show intricacy of colour, tone and shape, the Sphagnum is elegantly simple. Its cells are blank -- just spaces for water to fill."
Burnett can write in nature guide language. Every now and again there's a straightforward piece and it comes (to me) as a relief. But you know it's not what she really wants to do.
When I got to the end, I wondered what the twelve words for moss (as in the title) actually were. I guess it's obvious when you go back and look. There are twelve chapters and each one is just one word, so these must be the twelve. But most (not all) of these twelve chapter words are also Burnett's names for mosses she particularly likes: eg Glowflake, Brilliant, Flamambulist, Little Peach, Dawn. These words are also poem titles (because there is a poem for each moss). But there are well over thirty poems, and so doesn't that mean she has well over thirty words for moss?
I suspect the title is designed to sell the book and place it neatly into the nature memoir category. But really it's a piece of poet's making, and poets do their own thing in their own way and on their own terms. It's not like anything else I've ever read. I don't want to read it again. It's not quite prose and it's not quite poetry (neither good words in the best order, nor the best words in the best order). But an interesting experiment, yes, and also authentic: something she needed to write.