What a book! It covers so much more ground than a mere life story, or maybe that's just because his life story within itself covered that ground. I have no idea how close this book's representation of Temudjin is to his actual historical figure however in my eyes it represents a much bigger archetypal vision. An archetypal truth of divine purpose maybe.
The story of the Bhagavad Gita comes to mind where heroic warrior Arjuna is doubtful about an upcoming enormous battle where he has to fight his deceitful cousins and mentors. On Arjuna's side is Krishna, the divine, all-knowing consciousness, who through one of the most influential historical dialogues convinces Arjuna to follow his heart without doubt as long as his deeds, no matter what they are, are performed with devotion and sacrifice to the eternal flow of life - being Krishna.
The message as such is to follow his much bigger purpose as a divine warrior. The text of course is esoteric and not to be taken lightly by just anyone. Similarly are my thoughts as I try to write them down :)
Genghis khan is portrayed neither simply as a wrathful scourge, nor as heroic conqueror. He is portrayed as a man who believes it is his purpose, as sent from the Mengke-köke-Tengri, the eternal blue sky, to unite all people under his banner. No matter the cost.
Is this the story of greed and a tyrannical supremacy; Yes, and yet maybe there's more to it. And Bergius does an amazing job portraying him thus; as a tyrant humble enough to take advice and partake in discussions with learned men about peaceful masters like Gautama the Buddha, Lao Tse, Christ,...
The dialogues between, on the one hand, a bloodthirsty ruler and on the other the compassionate teachings of Buddha-like figures is simply inspirational.
We are taken on a journey with one mayor philosophical question left for the reader to answer: Lies the final judgement in our actions or in our heart? Does each and everyone have it's purpose like a ravaging volcanic eruption leaving fertile soil for rebirth? Is Genghis like such a natural necessity in balancing the natural forces and laws? I find these questions interesting and for this I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested, not only in historical topics, but in such as philosophical morality.