Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

City Form and Everyday Life: Toronto's Gentrification and Critical Social Practice

Rate this book
One feature of contemporary urban life has been the widespread transformation, by middle-class resettlement, of older inner-city neighbourhoods formerly occupied by working-class and underclass communities. Often termed ?gentrification,? this process has been a focus of intense debate in urban study and in the social sciences. This case study explores processes of change in Toronto's inner neighbourhoods in recent decades, integrating an understanding of political economy with an appreciation of the culture of everyday urban life. The author locates Toronto's gentrification in a context of both global and local patterns of contemporary city-building, focusing on the workings of the property industry and of the local state, the rise and decline of modernist planning, and the transition to postindustrial urbanism. Drawing on a series of in-depth interviews among a segment of Toronto's inner-city, middle-class population, Caulfield argues that the seeds of gentrification have included patterns of critical social practice and that the 'gentrified' landscape is highly paradoxical, embodying both the emerging dominance of a deindustrialized urban economy and an immanent critique of contemporary city-building.

253 pages, Paperback

First published March 1, 1994

1 person is currently reading
21 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
3 (100%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Jack.
6 reviews
February 9, 2024
The most curious stuff here is resident interviews, interesting peak into a bygone local milieu—artist class/working class/learned left wing politically active reformist residents in Toronto’s gentrifying residential core, early 1970s.

My problem comes with this obsession Caulfield has with ‘debunking’ or, at the very least, distancing himself from so-called ‘Orthodox Marxist’ or ‘structuralist’ geographers—a few nasty misreading of Smith’s rent gap theory in here too—and any opportunity to rag on David Harvey is taken with excitement.

Lots of great photos though.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.