I knew Malcolm Knox as the bloke who used to write about cricket. Precise, laconic, occasionally caustic. So, opening “The First Friend” and finding myself in 1937 Georgia, deep in the terror years, was something else entirely. This isn’t the Knox of Test match dispatches. It’s Knox the moral satirist, dissecting tyranny with the patience of a surgeon and the nerve of someone who has stared at power too long.
The setting matters. Georgia is no backdrop here; it’s a pressure cooker. The mountains press in, the air hums with suspicion and Beria’s secret police prowl through every conversation. Stalin is still alive, Beria is rising fast, and the machinery of terror is hitting full speed. Everyone’s complicit, everyone afraid. Knox catches that atmosphere with unnerving clarity. The laughter is brittle, the wine sour, and every knock on the door could end a life.
At the heart of it is Vasil Murtov, a middling functionary whose survival depends on pleasing a man he despises. Half decent, half deluded, he believes that if he just keeps his head down, the system will somehow right itself. It won’t. What keeps him there is the same thing that keeps every moral coward in motion: fear, loyalty and love twisted into submission. His wife and daughters hover over the story, both philosophical and physical hostages. Under Beria, “philosophical” danger means being erased from history; “physical” means something far uglier. Knox never shows the violence directly, but its shadow is everywhere.
The countdown structure, 40 days to live, down to none, is brutal and brilliant. It lends the book a fatal rhythm, each chapter another tick toward the abyss. You know Murtov’s doomed, but the suspense lies in watching what part of him will die first. When he finally uses his words, his only real weapon, against the regime, it lands like a moral thunderclap.
As a Socialist, I found Knox’s treatment of ideology both faithful and scathing. He sees how the revolution curdled into bureaucratic thuggery, how the language of equality was hollowed out to serve hierarchy. I’ve always leaned towards Trotsky, who still believed in the revolutionary imagination before it was crushed under Stalin’s paranoia. Knox catches that tragedy perfectly. The air still carries the ghost of the original dream, tattered but recognisable.
When Sergo Ordzhonikidze appears, I felt a jolt of recognition and grief. Here’s a man I’ve always liked, the last of the genuine Bolsheviks, watching his own ideals collapse around him. His presence is a sad reminder of what might have been if the Party hadn’t eaten itself alive. Knox handles it with quiet dignity. No grand speech, just a sense of a good man broken by a machine he helped build.
The writing has that crisp, knowing humour I associate with good Australian journalism. Knox’s satire recalls Orwell’s moral fury, but without the sanctimony. Where Orwell sees a system of lies, Knox sees the human comedy within it: the petty jealousies, the bureaucratic self-preservation, the absurdity of people performing loyalty while terrified. There’s something of Andrey Kurkov too, that faint surrealism that bubbles up in horror. One moment you’re laughing, the next you’re sick. And "Darkness at Noon" hangs over everything, that claustrophobic sense that reason itself has been outlawed.
Knox’s attention to detail is extraordinary. The food, the landscape, the political meetings thick with cigarette smoke and coded menace; it all feels real, lived in. The novel balances historical precision with psychological bite. You feel the weight of the Party’s gaze, the exhaustion of living under permanent suspicion, the moral corrosion that comes from survival at any cost.
If there’s a flaw, it’s that the opening drags. The pace is uneven, and a few of the minor characters verge on caricature when understatement would have done more. Yet once it finds its rhythm, it’s gripping, grimly funny and entirely convincing.
The ending leaves you hollow but not hopeless. Murtov’s defiance costs him everything, yet it feels right. Beria, of course, survives to do worse. That’s history’s cruelty. Still, Knox finds something redemptive in the act of telling the truth, however briefly. Words can’t topple tyrants, but they can outlast them.
“The First Friend” is a fierce, brilliant novel; part political thriller, part moral parable, part act of remembrance. It’s bleak, humane and scathingly intelligent. Four stars.