This review was originally posted on r/GrimDarkEpicFantasy by u/SoullessEddie.
So, is it any good? No, it is not good. It is great! Though be warned, the story carries a certain psycho-social undertone that may not jive with everyone. It may also be a more intellectual endeavor than the average Grimdark fan is used to. And, indeed, the offering is rather on the slimmer side. Nonetheless, this book offers everything you could ask for, as far as a prequel novella goes. Moreover, there is a whole interactive world out there, you just gotta be brave enough to look.
Now, let Eddie tell you why this book is worth your time without spoiling anything major...
Let me prefix the review with: this is not the kind of comfy, cozy book that you read to wind down after a hard day’s work. This book surfaces more as a group project where you are the sole person who actually cares about its completion, while other participants lounge around doing the bare minimum or nothing. But since you care, you do the work. You go to the library, you negotiate the research, and you connect the dots because you wish to understand. All this to say, reading the Genesis of Change is more work than play, but the kind of work that is deeply rewarding in its own right if you’re so inclined.
0.80 | Themes — The Genesis of Change delves deeply into existential and philosophical themes that elevate it beyond typical grimdark fantasy fare. Central to the narrative is the tension between longevity/immortality and mortality, reminiscent of timeless human quests found in the Epic of Gilgamesh or the lore of Nicholas Flamel. The story probes the fragility of the human mind, addressing madness, susceptibility to manipulation, and the precarious nature of sanity. These themes invite readers to reflect on what it means to endure and change across vast timescales, confronting the psychological cost of near-eternal life. While this intellectual depth is a major strength, it may also narrow the book’s appeal, as its dense philosophical undertones occasionally create a barrier to emotional connection or straightforward enjoyment, making it feel more like a cerebral exercise than a leisure read.
0.80 | Characterization — The characters in this novella are distinctive and thought-provoking, particularly the gender-neutral, immortal alchemists who serve as both protagonists and guides through the story’s complex moral landscape. Their motivations, ranging from pursuit of arcane knowledge to fulfilling the enigmatic Rector’s will, are layered and ambiguous, highlighting conflicts between knowledge, power, and ethical boundaries. These scions of knowledge carry a mix of cold pragmatism and moral ambiguity, which enriches the narrative’s intellectual appeal. However, this subtle characterization sometimes leaves the characters just beyond full emotional reach. Their distance and inscrutability, while thematically appropriate, can limit reader empathy and investment compared to more traditionally fleshed-out characters.
0.75 | Plot — The plot is concise and mission-driven, revolving around the alchemists’ efforts to break and transform their charges according to their objectives. The story alternates perspectives effectively, maintaining tension and thematic coherence, but it is more conceptual and philosophical than action-packed, which is fitting but may feel slow or foggy at certain points. The motivations behind some actions are deliberately elusive, inviting readers to engage with the abstract layers of the narrative rather than conventional plot beats. While this approach makes the story feel fresh and intellectually stimulating, it also means that those seeking a more straightforward or emotionally gripping narrative might find it lacking in immediacy and clarity.
0.70 | World-building — the Tower is intriguing, I wish we got to see a bit more, just a few glimpses. The background setting is there, and the author makes sure to show off the decorated scenes before playing them out. I enjoyed the complex concepts of Alchemy, however, I found myself flipping to the glossary more often than I would have liked. Because to truly understand the abstract, philosophical nuances, one has to first swallow their pride and learn alongside the protagonists. When it comes to indies, I primarily look for new ideas, and am quite forgiving when it comes to execution as long as the stories feel fresh and original. This book delivers.
0.95 | Prose — I’d be remiss not to point out the attention and the care given to the exactness of the prose in this book. Every paragraph, every sentence weighed and thought out several times over. The author’s time-sunk and deliberation on the precise manner in which these scenes are presented speaks back to me. Of course, every author does their best to translate their vision to words, but few in the indie world achieve this level of excellence. The only minor thing that bugged me was the occasional density of the philosophical exposition, which can slow the pace and make the narrative feel a bit heavy-handed at times. While this depth is part of the book’s unique charm, it may challenge readers who prefer a more fluid or action-oriented story.
This is a clever book for attentive fans who like to spend their time thinking about not only what is written, but also what the author is trying to convey by penning down these stories. Admittedly, the barrier to entry is a lot higher than your usual leisure activity, and you may be confronted with a few ideas that make it less fun and more work-like. But that takes us to the fundamentals: what are books or stories even for? Is it to pass the time, to learn or experience something one would miss out on otherwise, or is it to challenge us, our way of thinking, and show an alternative? Does it even matter as long as you enjoy the time spent reading? It is in your hands, after all, and you’ll find more than enough food for thought in the Genesis of Change.
Running Total: 4.00 / 5.00 — A Grim Outlook at Life’s Externalities