________________________________________
Book: The Daily 5
Author: Gail Boushey and Joan Moser
Rating: 2 Out of 5 Stars
As a teacher who’s particularly discerning when it comes to educational texts, I found The Daily 5 by Gail Boushey and Joan Moser to be… just okay. While the book offers some valuable strategies, many of the ideas presented felt a bit too familiar to me. For the most part, it reads as common sense, rather than groundbreaking material, and I didn’t feel like I learned much that was new. That said, the book does include some strong concepts that are worth considering, especially for teachers who are just beginning to develop their literacy instruction practices.
One of the ideas I appreciated most was the emphasis on minimizing worksheets. As someone who is always looking for more engaging ways to teach, I agree that worksheets often don’t serve students as well as interactive and creative activities. This focus on more hands-on, student-driven learning was refreshing.
Another strength of the book is its focus on parent involvement. Boushey and Moser underscore the importance of involving parents in their child’s literacy development, which is something I fully support. Having parents engaged in the learning process helps reinforce the work done in the classroom and fosters a more holistic approach to education.
The concept of student choice is another point I really appreciate. Giving students the ability to choose what they work on—within reason—can be a powerful motivator. The idea of "good fit" books is a cornerstone of the Daily 5 model, which encourages students to select reading material that aligns with their interests and reading level. I’m a fan of this approach because it helps foster a love of reading and ensures students don’t feel overwhelmed by material that’s too difficult or uninteresting.
Lastly, I can’t help but mention the appendices. I’m always grateful when a textbook includes practical resources and ready-made materials, and The Daily 5 does not disappoint. The extras provided in the book, such as lesson plans, checklists, and templates, make it easy for teachers to implement the strategies without having to create everything from scratch. For busy educators, this is a huge time-saver.
While I did appreciate some of the strategies in the book, there were also several aspects that left me frustrated.
First, I felt that the book placed too much emphasis on math and reading, to the detriment of other subjects. For example, the sample lesson plan in the book allocates just thirty minutes for a "flex block," where all other subjects (like science, social studies, or art) are taught. Given the importance of a well-rounded education, this was a bit troubling. I understand that literacy and math are crucial, but I firmly believe that other subjects deserve equal attention in a student’s day. The Daily 5 framework doesn't seem to offer much guidance on how to balance these other subjects effectively with the focus on reading and writing.
Another point of frustration for me was that the book often felt too basic, especially for teachers with experience. For example, the emphasis on choosing books that hold students' interest should be a no-brainer for most educators. I didn’t feel that this concept needed to be spelled out in such detail. More advanced ideas, or strategies for differentiating instruction, would have made the book more valuable for a wider range of teachers. As it stands, much of the content felt redundant to those already familiar with student-centered teaching practices.
Finally, while I understand the intent behind the Daily 5 structure, I felt that it was too rigid and didn’t offer enough flexibility for a broader, interdisciplinary curriculum. The framework excels at fostering independent literacy routines, but I believe it could benefit from more suggestions on how to integrate subjects or build a more comprehensive daily schedule. Teachers who are looking for a more holistic approach to instruction might find The Daily 5 too narrow in focus.
In conclusion, The Daily 5 is a solid resource for teachers, particularly those in early elementary grades or those just starting to implement literacy centers. The focus on student choice, parent involvement, and minimizing worksheets are all strong elements of the book. However, for more experienced educators, many of the concepts might feel overly simplistic or obvious. Additionally, the heavy emphasis on math and reading at the expense of other subjects may not suit every teaching style or curriculum approach.
Ultimately, while The Daily 5 offers useful strategies for building independent literacy routines, it may not be the best fit for educators seeking a more balanced or cross-curricular approach to instruction. Still, for those looking to improve their literacy practices and create a more student-centered classroom, it’s definitely worth a look.