Let’s start with the positives for the book. If you’re looking for a very basic, broad strokes overview of the history of Scotland, you can find that here, to an extent. You’re going to mostly get information about the early tribes and groups, the Roman occupation, and then a summary of what each of the monarchs did during their reign, with little sprinkling of daily life, religion and technology thrown in. So if that’s what you’re looking for, this might be useful.
Now on to the negatives. Given the current state of things and the fact that this book is produced by a group without a named author, I have to question who was responsible for this. Was it multiple people? Who actually did the writing and the researching? The writing was odd and so bland and straightforward that it belongs in the driest of history books. For all the group being called “History Brought Alive”, I have never found a history book so dull as this one, making it very much not brought to life on the page. Here are some of the things that stood out as being strange or difficult to get through.
-The introduction gave off weird vibes. For example, these final lines stating, “Don’t waste your time and energy on confusing and ineffective books. You have the answers you need right here.” In studying history, should we not be encouraging people to find diverse sources and perspectives? This feels very much like a “trust me, I know best” line that I don’t care for.
It also says, “Information that’s devoid of myth as much as possible to debunk misconceptions is provided.” While I appreciate that we’re going for factual information here, the title of the book mentions legends and myths, both of which are indeed integral to the understanding of a country’s history. Neither is really even mentioned in the book.
-It never indicated whether the year was C.E., even in sentences that mentioned a span of years including B.C.E., which makes things slightly uncertain on dates. For example, we have “The Iron Age followed the Bronze Age, from around 800 B.C.E. to 400.” I’ve never seen anything historical refer to such early years in the common era without mentioning something like “in the year” or without C.E., which led to awkward sentences like “The Romans arrived in the middle of this Celtic period—around 43,” and “The lack of defense made them a soft target, resulting in Roman conquest in 84.”
-It was also often repetitive in the vocabulary it used in consecutive sentences, or even within the same sentence, such as “When Septimius Severus’s son was sent to destroy them once and for all in 211, his own troops refused as they refused to acknowledge him as their emperor.”
-This may just be a me-thing, but I also would have appreciated some maps, especially as it discussed the areas that different groups had control over. Since it was discussing Medieval times and before, just looking up certain areas on current maps is not always helpful because they don’t fully correspond. Some maps created specifically for what this book described would have been helpful. Similarly, some actual pictures or paintings of the events described would have been nice. The pictures included were generic and sometimes didn’t even correspond to the time period being described on the page.
-When I got to the section on the kings during the Medieval Period, I thought I was finally getting into some more interesting information. Unfortunately, as it described every single king in order, it often repeated itself from one to the next. For example we get this in the section about Duncan I: “Further, when Malcolm II died, he nominated Duncan as his heir, which further violated custom. The system in place at the time would have given the rule to someone in an alternate branch of the royal family, which is one of the reasons Macbeth rose up against Duncan within the first few years of his rule—Macbeth being from the other branch.” And then, on the very next page in the section on Macbeth: “He had a claim to the Scottish throne when Malcolm II died, but his cousin (Duncan I) inherited it instead due to breaking the customs that were in place about who should get the throne. As a result, conflict broke out between the two factions of the family.” Not to mention that in the section before Duncan I about Malcolm II it said this: “He tried to get around the succession process for his successor so that the throne would go to his grandson as well. He succeeded, but in doing so, it laid the groundwork for the violence that ensued with Macbeth and Duncan’s son, Malcolm III Canmore.” By the end of this section, I had read the same information rephrased slightly so many times I almost gave up this book.
-We get this interesting line when we get to the section on the Stewarts: “Robert II’s sex life contributed to later stability of the kingdom.” Was there no other way to put this? Up until this time, it’s been a pretty dry, straightforward way of writing, but then this?
-I have no idea what’s going on in this section on the Renaissance: “Even the royal family’s status shifted from their right to rule to their capacity to hold the ruling position. While their position had elevated because of the Renaissance, the use of mathematics to get better weapons was of more importance.” Weird, and then interesting how we go on to show how the Stewarts just kept ruling for centuries, as if it all came down to the weaponry they had and not the line of succession and their name.
-I’m not familiar enough with the rest of the history mentioned in this book, but I do know enough about Mary, Queen of Scots to know that this information about her is inaccurate: “His daughter, Mary, Queen of Scots, was born six days after his death.” The truth is that James V died six days after she was born, so she became queen at six days old.
Finally, the link in the ebook at the beginning advertising their site and a free download of other books took me to a phishing pop-up, which immediately made me suspicious and turned me off. Part of the reason I even bothered to finish this book was so I could write this review and warn other readers off. I was really excited to get a quick review of Scottish history before a trip there, and was hoping to learn more about other topics with the other books from this group, but I was so turned off by this, I just can’t.
I received an advance review copy for free, and I am leaving this review voluntarily.