James Grippando’s Grave Danger is a courtroom drama centered around a custody battle for a child whose mother is disappeared by the morality police of Iran. South Florida hotshot lawyer Jack Zwyteck takes his troubled marriage with an FBI agent wife into an international case with wheels within wheels behind it. The novel is a page-turner with enough legal language and quick exchanges in court to seem well-researched and real; the external political forces at play have novel credibility if lacking it when compared with reality, at least as I know it.
But when has precise verisimilitude been the defining factor of a good novel? The drama develops, and Jack’s experience as a criminal defense lawyer makes him skeptical of everyone’s motives - including his wife’s. The turns the story takes may prove helpful to his marriage if not to his faith in mankind. This international custody case must adhere to rules of the Hague Convention, and Jack must learn to navigate the rules quickly against a formidable opponent, but his main concern is his client, Zahra, and her disappeared sister’s daughter, Yasmine, whom Zahra has adopted as her own and fled to America, effectively taking Yasmine from her father.
The complication is that Yamine’s mother Ava has become an international human rights figure. She protests the crackdown of the morality police over the forced wearing of a hijab and is swept up, arrested, and then perhaps killed for her part in the demonstration. Meanwhile, an American is being held in Iran, and the American state department has prioritized his return. To steady the negotiations to save the captive, pressures build against Jack’s case from many, sometimes mysterious directions. They seek to compel him not to mention Ava and especially not to assert that she is dead, which is in question. And yet Zahra has married her sister’s husband in order to adopt Yasmine even as she plots her escape to America.
So Jack must defend Zahra’s absconding with Yasmine without stirring the pot of international intrigue. Jack has a young daughter of his own, so his heart is bent on doing the best thing for Yasmine in the face of strong pro-father laws in Iran. The case is part family court, part international man of mystery thriller. I can honestly say this: the story is fresh. I have not read Grippando before, and the tension in families - both Zahra’s and Jack’s - play out in unusual but understandable ways.
I am not running out to acquire all of Grippando’s novels immediately simply because I like a variety of voices and styles, but he is definitely on my radar for when a legal thriller seems like the perfect fit for the moment. The pressures of international diplomacy, family strife, and competitive but principled lawyering all result somehow in a sound verdict.
If I find a weakness, it is related to another reviewer’s comments. She said that she could have used another hundred pages or so, just to kill time. I feel so different: my reading must mean something, or why do it? This well-written, gripping legal thriller hardly has a weakness, but does it make me think? Does it challenge my views? I look at the dynamics of two families, the Zwytecks and the Bazzis, for some correspondence with the dynamics of two nations. I hope there is more to reveal itself as the novel settles in among a hundred other stories and experiences. Maybe I will read a great review on Goodreads. For now, it feels like serial television.