Source criticism has been at the center of biblical studies for the last two centuries. In that time, it has produced a wide range of theories and approaches, often conflicting. This book provides a concise overview of the major approaches and positions in the field, helping the reader understand where scholarship has been and where it currently stands, and situating each major development within its broader intellectual and social context.
Joel S. Baden is professor of Hebrew Bible at Yale Divinity School. He is the coauthor, with Candida R. Moss, of Bible Nation: The United States of Hobby Lobby and Reconceiving Infertility: Biblical Perspectives on Procreation and Childlessness (both Princeton). He lives in New Haven, Connecticut.
This is actually an incredibly well-written and concise overview. I planned at first to just skim it but quickly found myself reading chapter by chapter, page by page.
Great little book. Baden outlines the history of the study of Pentateuchal sources. He starts from the earliest ideas and moves to Wellhausen, and then on to Von Rad, Noth, and finally Rendtorf, on whom he spends a good deal of time. In the final chapter he introduces his own approach ("neo-documentarian") and explains how it differs from Wellhausen's JEDP and Rendtorf's atomistic model.
Overall the big picture is very well-represented, and the reader new to this area of study will benefit greatly from this overview. He does spend quite a bit of time on the work of German protestants from a century ago, and relatively little on this generation of scholars. But still a very valuable and readable resource.
I'm sure it would serve well for its intended audience as an intro for undergraduates who intend to do further study in this area.
I understand that there are other academic theories other than JEDP that have gained some traction, these were not addressed. I could be wrong about that, but the fact that I'm left unclear is a weakness in the book.
For me as a lay reader seeking just an overview of current consensus scholarship, the writing could have been simplified, and even at just 150 pages, this was probably more than I wanted to know about the development of different/old JEDP frameworks.
Each chapter ends with a case study of how the Jacobs Ladder story is parsed under the theory discussed in that chapter, which was super helpful.